Guided by the intersectional approach (Crenshaw, 1989), this dissertation investigates racial, gender, and socioeconomic status (SES) disparities in mathematics achievement and persistence across two critical phases: the high school mathematics pipeline and college gateway mathematics courses. It also identifies key factors that may effectively close these intersectional disparities. This dissertation comprises two chapters of quantitative studies, which aim to shed light on the mechanisms underlying intersectional disparities in mathematics education and potential interventions to address them.Chapter 2 examines disparities in high school mathematics achievement through an intersectional lens of race and SES. By examining the effects of mandating Algebra I and Algebra II enrollment and school-level resources, this chapter investigates whether and how these interventions can narrow the racial and SES disparities in high school mathematics. The results indicate that low SES minority students are disproportionately placed in lower academic tracks compared to their high SES or White peers. However, mandating universal access to Algebra I by 9th grade, by itself, has a limited effect on reducing disparities. When universal access to Algebra I by 9th grade is combined with an improved school environment, the disparities reduce substantially. This highlights the need to address both individual course-taking trajectories and environmental contextual factors. Chapter 3 extends to college mathematics gateway courses. Utilizing an intersectional lens of race and gender, this dissertation investigates the disparities in students’ achievement and their relation to survival and persistence in the gateway calculus course sequence. Results reveal significant racial and gender disparities in achievement, survival, and persistence rates. Specifically, women face compounded and synergistic disadvantages in achieving high grades, which have a cascade effect on their survival and persistence rates. In contrast, non-URM women achieve higher average grades than URM women but are less likely to persist at any grade level than all other groups. It highlights the importance of nuanced and fine-grained classifications in informing and tailoring policy across race and gender groups to narrow disparities. Overall, this dissertation contributes to the ongoing effort to understand sociodemographic disparities in mathematics achievement, calling for policies tailored to intersectional groups.