- Giraldez, Maria D;
- Spengler, Ryan M;
- Etheridge, Alton;
- Godoy, Paula M;
- Barczak, Andrea J;
- Srinivasan, Srimeenakshi;
- De Hoff, Peter L;
- Tanriverdi, Kahraman;
- Courtright, Amanda;
- Lu, Shulin;
- Khoory, Joseph;
- Rubio, Renee;
- Baxter, David;
- Driedonks, Tom AP;
- Buermans, Henk PJ;
- Nolte-'t Hoen, Esther NM;
- Jiang, Hui;
- Wang, Kai;
- Ghiran, Ionita;
- Wang, Yaoyu E;
- Van Keuren-Jensen, Kendall;
- Freedman, Jane E;
- Woodruff, Prescott G;
- Laurent, Louise C;
- Erle, David J;
- Galas, David J;
- Tewari, Muneesh
RNA-seq is increasingly used for quantitative profiling of small RNAs (for example, microRNAs, piRNAs and snoRNAs) in diverse sample types, including isolated cells, tissues and cell-free biofluids. The accuracy and reproducibility of the currently used small RNA-seq library preparation methods have not been systematically tested. Here we report results obtained by a consortium of nine labs that independently sequenced reference, 'ground truth' samples of synthetic small RNAs and human plasma-derived RNA. We assessed three commercially available library preparation methods that use adapters of defined sequence and six methods using adapters with degenerate bases. Both protocol- and sequence-specific biases were identified, including biases that reduced the ability of small RNA-seq to accurately measure adenosine-to-inosine editing in microRNAs. We found that these biases were mitigated by library preparation methods that incorporate adapters with degenerate bases. MicroRNA relative quantification between samples using small RNA-seq was accurate and reproducible across laboratories and methods.