Because information theory equates information with event occurrence probabilities, when applying its methods, language researchers typically take the information provided by words to be their relative frequencies in a corpus. This implicitly assumes words occur uniformly across contexts, however empirically, word distributions are bursty: the likelihood of most words appearing in most contexts is small, whereas the likelihood of a word recurring in context is much higher. In an elicitation study we examined whether speakers are sensitive to the dynamic word occurrence probabilities this implies. Consistent with proposals that prenominal adjectives increase noun predictability, participants produced numerous seemingly redundant adjectives prior to unambiguous nouns at first mention. However, despite receiving no feedback, they produced significantly fewer adjectives before subsequent mentions of the same nouns, indicating they had re-evaluated their probabilities. These results support the idea that prenominal adjectives facilitate efficient communication, and that speakers' representations of lexical probabilities are dynamic.

We present an experimental study that examines how lexical iconicity (i.e. onomatopoeia) affects early word learning,across learning contexts. Children aged 24-36 months (N=37) were first trained on labels that are either iconic or neutralwith respect to the referent event, and then tested using a forced-choice task to select the correct referent given a label. Weassessed learning across two contexts: situated, where label and referent co-occur, and displaced, where children learn thelabel following the referent event. We predicted that iconicity would aid word learning, and would have a more facilitatoryeffect in the displaced condition, helping the child to associate label and referent. Our findings demonstrate that childrenlearn iconic labels in the experiment better than they do neutral labels. However, we find no difference across learningcontextsiconicity facilitates word learning in both situated and displaced learning scenarios.

Most research on how children learn the mapping betweenwords and world has assumed that language is arbitrary, andhas investigated language learning in contexts in which objectsreferred to are present in the environment. Here, we reportanalyses of a semi-naturalistic corpus of caregivers talking totheir 2-3 year-old. We focus on caregivers’ use of non-arbitrarycues across different expressive channels: both iconic(onomatopoeia and representational gestures) and indexical(points and actions with objects). We ask if these cues are useddifferently when talking about objects known or unknown tothe child, and when the referred objects are present or absent.We hypothesize that caregivers would use these cues moreoften with objects novel to the child. Moreover, they would usethe iconic cues especially when objects are absent becauseiconic cues bring to the mind’s eye properties of referents. Wefind that cue distribution differs: all cues except points are morecommon for unknown objects indicating their potential role inlearning; onomatopoeia and representational gestures are morecommon for displaced contexts whereas indexical cues aremore common when objects are present. Thus, caregiversprovide multimodal non-arbitrary cues to support children’svocabulary learning and iconicity – specifically – can supportlinking mental representations for objects and labels.