Structure and improve MIME types configuration #139
Conversation
Based on the work done under the [h5bp][1], this change improves the structure of the MIME type configuration and brings the latest [standard updates][2] to its values. [1]: https://github.com/h5bp/server-configs-nginx [2]: https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/media-types.xhtml
|
The purpose of the Regarding the fundamental increasing of the MIME types list. It seems that extensions of this example should be reasonable. In addition to existing in IANA media types should be supported by popular clients/browsers. Randomly adding rare and ambiguous MIME types does not look useful. At the same time, specific needs/types can always be configured based on the example. As for the current pull request. Could you please clarify the reasons why you add and change the position for so many MIME types? It looks like a lot of MIME types are not well supported by clients/browsers. As for the #125 and #137 pull requests. There are relevant answers there, too. |
.cur support: nginx#139
Proposed changes
Based on the work done under the project H5BP (disclaimer: I'm the maintainer), this change improves the structure of the MIME type configuration and brings the latest standard updates to its values.
All the types have been tested against the project Media Type Database, referencing the industry standard, un-opinionated, MIME-types uses.
This change would help to deliver correct MIME types out of the box, and reduce mismatching as much as possible.
Closes #137
Closes #125