✏️ rewrite alternatives → scheduler.postTask() section

astoilkov · Mar 18, 2024 · ad399c9 · ad399c9
1 parent bd513a7
commit ad399c9
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 9 deletions.
diff --git a/readme.md b/readme.md
@@ -121,15 +121,7 @@ Web Workers are a great fit if you have: 1) heavy algorithm (e.g. image processi
 
 ### `scheduler.postTask()`
 
-[`scheduler.postTask()`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Scheduler/postTask) is available in some browsers today. `postTask` is a great alternative, you just need to have a better understanding on its inner workings. `main-thread-scheduling` aims to be easier to use. For example, `main-thread-scheduling` uses the `isInputPending()` API to ensure the UI doesn't freeze when the user interacts with the page (if you use `scheduler.postTask()` you will need to do that manually). Also, if you have running animations while running your tasks, you will see `main-thread-scheduling` perform better.
-
-If you want the benefits of `main-thread-scheduling`, but you prefer the callback based `postTask()` API/thinking model, then here is an implementation of `postTask()` using `yieldOrContinue()`:
-```ts
-async function postTask(callback: () => void | Promise<void>) {
-    await yieldOrContinue('interactive')
-    await callback()
-}
-```
+[`scheduler.postTask()`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Scheduler/postTask) is available in some browsers today. `postTask()` and `main-thread-scheduling` share some commonalities. You can think of `postTask()` as a lower level API — it might be the right choice in specific scenarios. Library owners might be interested in exploring the nuanced differences between the two. For most cases, `main-thread-scheduling` provides a `scheduleTask()` method that mimics that API of `postTask()` while providing the extra benefits of the library.
 
 <!--