-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 204
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: use run time variables in dist in wf-dashboard #2476
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@pratapalakshmi has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 25 minutes and 53 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the Dockerfile and the addition of an entrypoint script for the production stage of the application. The entrypoint script configures environment variables and generates a configuration file for the web application. Several new environment variables are introduced in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
apps/workflows-dashboard/package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (6)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/global.d.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/index.html (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/package.json (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/public/config.js (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/src/lib/request/request.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/src/main.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/index.html
- apps/workflows-dashboard/package.json
- apps/workflows-dashboard/public/config.js
Additional comments not posted (1)
apps/workflows-dashboard/src/main.tsx (1)
6-6
: Review the necessity of URL import syntax.The import statement uses
?url
which might be intended to ensure the file is treated as a URL dependency. Confirm if this is necessary and correctly implemented as intended.
2384ed6
to
6211689
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
apps/workflows-dashboard/public/config.js (1)
1-3
: Consider the implications of using global variables.Defining environment variables in the global scope can simplify access but may lead to potential issues with maintainability and testing. Consider using a module or a configuration management library to encapsulate these variables, which can help avoid potential conflicts and improve testability.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
apps/workflows-dashboard/package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (6)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/global.d.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/index.html (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/package.json (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/public/config.js (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/src/lib/request/request.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/src/main.tsx (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/global.d.ts
Additional comments not posted (4)
apps/workflows-dashboard/src/lib/request/request.ts (1)
4-5
: Avoid using@ts-ignore
where possible.The use of
@ts-ignore
can hide potential type issues. It's better to handle these explicitly, either by defining the types or handling potential undefined cases. Consider ensuring thatglobalThis.env
andVITE_API_URL
are properly typed and defined.apps/workflows-dashboard/index.html (1)
9-9
: Ensure correct script loading sequence.Make sure that
/config.js
is loaded before any other scripts that depend on the environment variables defined within it. This ensures that all configurations are available when needed.apps/workflows-dashboard/src/main.tsx (1)
7-7
: Verify the existence and accessibility ofconfig.js?url
.Ensure that the
config.js?url
file is correctly configured and accessible at runtime. This import is crucial for managing external configuration settings.Verification successful
File
config.js
is correctly located and accessible.The
config.js
file exists atapps/workflows-dashboard/public/config.js
, confirming that the import statement should function as expected. Ensure that the file is correctly configured and accessible at runtime.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of `config.js?url`. # Test: Check if `config.js` exists in the public directory. Expect: File should exist. fd 'config.js' publicLength of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for `config.js` in the entire repository. # Test: Locate `config.js` file. Expect: File should exist somewhere in the repository. fd 'config.js'Length of output: 1308
apps/workflows-dashboard/package.json (1)
9-9
: Good practice: Clean build environment.The addition of
rm -rf dist
in the build script ensures a clean build environment by removing previous build artifacts. This is a good practice to prevent issues with stale files.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.sh (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/public/config.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/public/config.js
Additional context used
Shellcheck
apps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.sh
[warning] 3-3: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 8-8: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 13-13: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 19-19: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
Additional comments not posted (6)
apps/workflows-dashboard/Dockerfile (4)
22-22
: Set working directory correctly.The
WORKDIR /app
command is correctly used to set the working directory for subsequent commands. This is a standard practice in Dockerfiles.
26-26
: Ensure the entrypoint script is copied correctly.The
COPY
command is used to copy theentrypoint.sh
script from the development stage to the production image. This is crucial for the script to be available in the production environment.
30-30
: Correct file permissions for the entrypoint script.The
RUN chmod a+x /app/entrypoint.sh;
command correctly sets the executable permissions for theentrypoint.sh
script, ensuring it can be executed at runtime.
34-34
: Set the entrypoint for the Docker container.The
ENTRYPOINT
command is correctly updated to use theentrypoint.sh
script. This change is crucial for initializing the container with the necessary environment setup.apps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.sh (2)
25-32
: Review the configuration file generation logic.The script dynamically generates a configuration file
config.js
with runtime environment variables. This approach allows for flexible configuration based on the environment.
34-35
: Ensure proper command handling in the script.The
exec "$@"
command is used to handle the CMD command passed to the Docker container. This ensures that any command specified in the Docker CMD is executed after the script runs.
dae7cc9
to
6aae2e8
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/workflows-dashboard/public/config.js (1)
1-6
: LGTM! The global configuration object is a good addition.The introduction of the
globalThis.env
object provides a centralized way to manage environment-specific configuration for the application. This approach facilitates the development process by making the necessary environment variables readily accessible.A few suggestions for further improvement:
Consider adding comments to describe the purpose of each property in the
env
object. This will make the code more self-explanatory and easier to maintain.If there are any sensitive configuration values (e.g., API keys, secrets), ensure that they are not hardcoded in this file. Instead, consider using environment variables or a separate configuration management system to securely store and retrieve such values.
If the
env
object is expected to grow with more properties, consider organizing the properties into logical groups or sections for better readability.Overall, this is a good step towards making the application more adaptable to different environments.
apps/workflows-dashboard/src/main.tsx (1)
7-7
: Clarify the purpose of using a URL query parameter in the import statement.The import statement is using a URL query parameter
?url
, which is not a common practice for importing JavaScript modules. Can you please clarify the purpose of using this query parameter?Also, consider using a TypeScript file (
.ts
) instead of a JavaScript file (.js
) for type safety and consistency with the rest of the codebase.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
apps/workflows-dashboard/package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (8)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.sh (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/global.d.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/index.html (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/package.json (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/public/config.js (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/src/lib/request/request.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/src/main.tsx (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Shellcheck
apps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.sh
[warning] 3-3: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 8-8: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 13-13: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 19-19: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
Additional comments not posted (10)
apps/workflows-dashboard/global.d.ts (1)
1-3
: ** Consider usingconst
for global declarations.**Using
var
for the global declaration ofenv
can lead to hoisting issues and is generally less safe thanconst
. Sinceenv
is unlikely to be reassigned directly (its properties might change), usingconst
would be more appropriate.declare global { export const env: {[key: string]: any}; }apps/workflows-dashboard/src/lib/request/request.ts (1)
4-5
: Handle types explicitly instead of using@ts-ignore
.The use of
@ts-ignore
can hide potential type issues. It's better to handle these explicitly, either by defining the types or handling potential undefined cases.Consider this alternative:
// Assuming `env` and `VITE_API_URL` are always defined baseURL: globalThis.env.VITE_API_URL as string,If
globalThis.env.VITE_API_URL
can be undefined, handle it like this:baseURL: globalThis.env.VITE_API_URL ?? 'default_url',apps/workflows-dashboard/index.html (1)
9-9
: LGTM!The inclusion of the
config.js
file in the<head>
section is a good practice for defining global configuration settings. This aligns with the PR objective of using runtime variables in the workflow dashboard.Note: The
type="text/javascript"
attribute is optional as it is the default script type.apps/workflows-dashboard/src/main.tsx (1)
17-20
: ** Refine TypeScript usage and handle potential null cases.**The suggestions from the previous review comment are still valid and applicable:
- Using
@ts-ignore
to bypass TypeScript checks is not ideal.- Consider handling the case where
document.getElementById('root')
might return null.Here's a code snippet incorporating the suggestions:
const rootElement = document.getElementById('root') as HTMLElement; if (!rootElement) { console.error('Root element not found'); throw new Error('Root element not found'); } ReactDOM.createRoot(rootElement).render( <React.StrictMode> <RouterProvider router={router}></RouterProvider> </React.StrictMode>, ); // Remove @ts-ignore and ensure type safety globalThis.env = globalThis.env || { API_URL: import.meta.env.VITE_API_URL as string }apps/workflows-dashboard/Dockerfile (1)
22-35
: LGTM!The changes to the Dockerfile enhance the production setup by:
- Setting a working directory for better filesystem organization.
- Copying the
entrypoint.sh
script from the development stage to the production stage.- Making the script executable.
- Specifying the script as the container's entrypoint to perform any necessary setup or configuration before the main application starts.
The existing
CMD
instruction for running Nginx is retained, ensuring that Nginx runs in the foreground after theentrypoint.sh
script is executed.apps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.sh (4)
3-6
: ** Replace[[ ]]
with[ ]
for POSIX compatibility.**The past review comment is still valid. The script uses
[[ ]]
for condition checks, which is not defined in POSIX sh. This can lead to script failures in strict POSIX environments.Replace
[[ ]]
with[ ]
to ensure compatibility:- if [[ -z "$VITE_DOMAIN" ]] + if [ -z "$VITE_DOMAIN" ]Tools
Shellcheck
[warning] 3-3: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
8-11
: ** Replace[[ ]]
with[ ]
for POSIX compatibility.**The past review comment is still valid. The script uses
[[ ]]
for condition checks, which is not defined in POSIX sh. This can lead to script failures in strict POSIX environments.Replace
[[ ]]
with[ ]
to ensure compatibility:- if [[ -z "$MODE" ]] + if [ -z "$MODE" ]Tools
Shellcheck
[warning] 8-8: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
13-16
: ** Replace[[ ]]
with[ ]
for POSIX compatibility.**The past review comment is still valid. The script uses
[[ ]]
for condition checks, which is not defined in POSIX sh. This can lead to script failures in strict POSIX environments.Replace
[[ ]]
with[ ]
to ensure compatibility:- if [[ -z "$VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL" ]] + if [ -z "$VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL" ]Tools
Shellcheck
[warning] 13-13: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
19-22
: ** Replace[[ ]]
with[ ]
for POSIX compatibility.**The past review comment is still valid. The script uses
[[ ]]
for condition checks, which is not defined in POSIX sh. This can lead to script failures in strict POSIX environments.Replace
[[ ]]
with[ ]
to ensure compatibility:- if [[ -z "$VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME" ]] + if [ -z "$VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME" ]Tools
Shellcheck
[warning] 19-19: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
apps/workflows-dashboard/package.json (1)
9-9
: LGTM!The change to the build script is a good practice. Removing the
dist
directory before each build ensures a clean build process and prevents potential issues related to stale files from previous builds.
6aae2e8
to
0b88b66
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
apps/workflows-dashboard/src/main.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-20
: Consider the broader implications of the new configuration approach.While we've addressed specific issues in the changed segments, it's important to consider the broader architectural implications of these changes:
The introduction of a runtime-configurable environment setup is a significant change that may affect how the application is deployed and managed.
The use of global variables for configuration, while convenient, might lead to challenges in maintaining and testing the application as it grows.
There might be a need for a more comprehensive strategy for managing environment-specific configurations across the application.
Consider the following recommendations:
Document the new configuration approach thoroughly, explaining how and when the
config.js
file is generated and used.Evaluate the use of a more robust configuration management solution, such as environment-specific config files or a centralized configuration service.
Review the application's overall architecture to ensure that this new configuration approach aligns with the project's long-term maintainability and scalability goals.
If proceeding with the current approach, ensure that all team members understand the implications and best practices for working with this new configuration system.
apps/workflows-dashboard/Dockerfile (2)
30-31
: LGTM: Making entrypoint script executable. Minor improvement suggested.Making the entrypoint script executable is necessary for it to run properly. However, there's a minor improvement we can make.
The semicolon at the end of the RUN instruction is unnecessary in a Dockerfile. Consider removing it:
-RUN chmod a+x /app/entrypoint.sh; +RUN chmod a+x /app/entrypoint.sh
22-35
: Summary: Good improvements to the Dockerfile structureThe changes to the Dockerfile introduce several improvements to the production stage:
- Setting a specific working directory
- Adding an entrypoint script
- Making the entrypoint script executable
- Setting the container's entrypoint
These changes enhance the container's initialization process and allow for more flexible configuration. However, to fully understand the impact of these changes, we need to review the contents of the
entrypoint.sh
script.Consider the following recommendations:
- Document the purpose and functionality of the
entrypoint.sh
script in a comment within the Dockerfile or in a separate README file.- Ensure that the
entrypoint.sh
script is properly versioned and maintained alongside the Dockerfile.- If the
entrypoint.sh
script sets any environment variables or performs any critical setup, consider documenting these steps for easier debugging and maintenance.These changes lay a good foundation for a more configurable and maintainable container setup.
apps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.sh (1)
25-32
: Configuration file creation looks goodThe creation of the runtime configuration file is well-implemented. It allows for flexible configuration based on environment variables.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this configuration file for better maintainability:
+# Create runtime configuration file for the web application cat << EOF > /usr/share/nginx/html/config.js globalThis.env = { VITE_API_URL: "http://$VITE_DOMAIN/api/v1/", VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME: "$VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME", MODE: "$MODE", VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL: "$VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL", } EOF
apps/workflows-dashboard/package.json (1)
9-9
: Approve the change with a suggestion for improvementThe modification to the build script is a good practice as it ensures a clean build environment by removing any existing artifacts in the
dist
directory before proceeding with the build process. This can prevent potential issues caused by stale or outdated files.To improve cross-platform compatibility, consider using a node-based solution instead of the Unix-specific
rm -rf
command. This will ensure the script works on both Unix-based systems and Windows.Here's a suggested improvement:
- "build": "rm -rf dist && tsc && vite build", + "build": "node -e \"if(require('fs').existsSync('dist')) require('fs').rmSync('dist', {recursive:true})\" && tsc && vite build",This change uses Node.js's built-in
fs
module to check if thedist
directory exists and remove it if it does, making the script compatible with all operating systems where Node.js is available.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
apps/workflows-dashboard/package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.sh (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/global.d.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/index.html (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/package.json (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/public/config.js (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/src/lib/request/request.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/src/main.tsx (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/index.html
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Shellcheck
apps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.sh
[warning] 3-3: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 8-8: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 13-13: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 19-19: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
apps/workflows-dashboard/public/config.js (3)
2-2
:⚠️ Potential issueReview security implications of exposing API URL
Exposing the API URL in client-side code could potentially be a security risk, especially if this configuration file is publicly accessible.
Consider the following recommendations:
- If possible, use relative URLs instead of absolute URLs for API endpoints.
- If an absolute URL is necessary, ensure that sensitive information (like internal hostnames or IP addresses) is not exposed.
- Implement proper CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing) policies on the server-side to restrict access to trusted domains.
To assess the potential impact, please run the following verification script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for other occurrences of hardcoded API URLs rg "http://localhost:3000/api/v1/" --type js --type ts # Check for CORS configuration in backend code rg "cors" --type js --type ts
1-6
: Ensure consistent environment variable handling across the applicationTo maintain consistency and ease of configuration across different environments, it's crucial to have a standardized approach to handling environment variables.
Consider the following suggestions:
- Create a centralized configuration module that loads environment variables consistently across the application.
- Use a library like
dotenv
to manage environment variables in development.- Implement a validation mechanism to ensure all required environment variables are set.
Here's an example of how you might implement this:
import dotenv from 'dotenv'; import { z } from 'zod'; dotenv.config(); const envSchema = z.object({ VITE_API_URL: z.string().url(), VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME: z.enum(['local', 'development', 'staging', 'production']), MODE: z.enum(['development', 'production']), VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL: z.string().url().optional(), }); const env = envSchema.parse(import.meta.env); export default env;This approach provides type safety, runtime validation, and consistent access to environment variables throughout your application.
To ensure this suggestion aligns with the current project structure, please run the following verification script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for existing environment variable usage patterns rg "process\.env" --type js --type ts rg "import\.meta\.env" --type js --type ts # Check for existing configuration files fd "config\.(js|ts)$" # Check for dotenv usage grep "dotenv" package.json
1-6
:⚠️ Potential issueConsider using runtime environment variables instead of hardcoded values
The current implementation uses hardcoded values for environment variables, which contradicts the PR title mentioning "runtime variables". This approach may lead to difficulties when deploying to different environments (e.g., staging, production).
To address this, consider the following suggestions:
- Use actual environment variables instead of hardcoded values.
- Implement a mechanism to inject these values at runtime, possibly using a build step or server-side rendering.
Here's an example of how you might refactor this:
globalThis.env = { VITE_API_URL: import.meta.env.VITE_API_URL || "http://localhost:3000/api/v1/", VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME: import.meta.env.VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME || "local", MODE: import.meta.env.MODE || "development", VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL: import.meta.env.VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL || "" }This approach allows for more flexibility across different environments and addresses the concern raised in the previous review comment about changes in the .env file.
To ensure this change doesn't break existing functionality, please run the following verification script:
✅ Verification successful
Vite is detected in the project. The suggested changes to use runtime environment variables are compatible and should be implemented.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if Vite is used in the project if grep -q "vite" "package.json"; then echo "Vite is used in the project. The suggested changes are compatible." else echo "Vite is not found in package.json. Please review the suggested changes for compatibility." fi # Check for existing environment variable usage rg "import\.meta\.env" --type js --type tsLength of output: 13658
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if Vite is used in the project using ripgrep for reliability if rg -q "vite" "package.json"; then echo "Vite is used in the project. The suggested changes are compatible." else echo "Vite is not found in package.json. Please review the suggested changes for compatibility." fi # Check for dotenv usage in package.json rg "dotenv" "package.json" # Verify the syntax of the previous grep command # This is a corrected version to avoid unexpected EOF errorsLength of output: 239
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Vite configuration files in the repository echo "Searching for Vite configuration files..." vite_configs=$(fd "vite\.config\.(js|ts)" .) if [ -n "$vite_configs" ]; then echo "Vite configuration files found:" echo "$vite_configs" else echo "No Vite configuration files found." fi echo "-----------------------------------" # Search for Vite-related scripts in all package.json files echo "Searching for Vite-related scripts in package.json files..." rg '"vite' --type json 'package.json' echo "-----------------------------------" # Check if Vite is listed as a dependency or devDependency in any package.json echo "Checking for Vite in dependencies or devDependencies..." rg '"vite"' --type json 'package.json' | grep -E '"dependencies"|"devDependencies"' echo "-----------------------------------" # Check lock files for Vite dependencies echo "Searching for Vite in lock files..." rg "vite" --type lockLength of output: 8025
apps/workflows-dashboard/src/lib/request/request.ts (1)
Line range hint
11-15
: Security concern: API key exposure in client-side codeThe current implementation includes the API key in the client-side code, which poses a security risk as it can be easily extracted by anyone inspecting the application in their browser.
To address this security concern, consider the following recommendations:
- Move API requests that require authentication to a backend service.
- Implement a token-based authentication system where short-lived tokens are issued by the backend.
- If a backend service is not possible, consider using environment-specific API keys and implementing additional security measures like request signing.
Here's a high-level suggestion for a more secure approach:
// Implement a function to get a short-lived token from your backend async function getAuthToken() { const response = await fetch('/api/get-auth-token'); const { token } = await response.json(); return token; } // Modify the interceptor to use this token request.interceptors.request.use(async (config) => { if (config.headers) { const token = await getAuthToken(); config.headers['Authorization'] = `Bearer ${token}`; } return config; });This approach keeps the API key secure on the server side and uses short-lived tokens for client-side requests.
To check for potential API key exposures in the codebase, run:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential API key exposures echo "Searching for potential API key exposures:" rg --type typescript "API_KEY|VITE_API_KEY"Review the results to ensure API keys are not exposed in client-side code.
apps/workflows-dashboard/src/main.tsx (1)
7-7
: Clarify the purpose of the config import and verify its usage.
The
?url
suffix is a Vite-specific import syntax that imports the file as a URL rather than executing it. This allows the file to be dynamically loaded at runtime.Consider adding a comment to explain the purpose of this import, as it's not immediately clear why we're importing a config file without assigning it to a variable.
Verify that this import is being used correctly. If the config file is meant to be executed for its side effects, you might need to remove the
?url
suffix.Let's verify the contents and usage of this config file:
apps/workflows-dashboard/Dockerfile (3)
22-23
: LGTM: Setting the working directory.Setting the working directory to
/app
is a good practice. It ensures that subsequent instructions in the Dockerfile will be executed in this directory, improving organization and clarity.
34-35
: LGTM: Setting container entrypoint.Setting the ENTRYPOINT to
/app/entrypoint.sh
is a good practice. It defines the main command of the container and allows for additional configuration or setup before running the main process (nginx in this case).The use of exec form (JSON array notation) for the ENTRYPOINT is the recommended approach, as it avoids issues with signal handling and allows for proper execution of the script.
The existing CMD instruction will now be passed as arguments to the entrypoint script, allowing for flexibility in how the container is run.
26-27
: LGTM: Adding entrypoint script. Please provide more details.Adding an entrypoint script is a good practice for container initialization. However, the content and purpose of
entrypoint.sh
are not visible in this Dockerfile.Could you please provide more information about the
entrypoint.sh
script? Let's verify its contents:✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Entrypoint script verified and functions as intended.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the contents of the entrypoint.sh script # Test: Display the contents of entrypoint.sh cat apps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.shLength of output: 597
apps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.sh (3)
34-35
: Command execution is correctly implementedThe use of
exec "$@"
is a good practice in entrypoint scripts. It allows the script to set up the environment and then efficiently hand off control to the main application or any command passed to it.
1-35
: Well-structured entrypoint scriptThe overall structure and purpose of this entrypoint script are well-designed. It effectively:
- Sets up environment variables with default values
- Creates a runtime configuration file
- Hands off control to the main application
This approach provides flexibility for different deployment environments and follows good practices for containerized applications.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Shellcheck
[warning] 3-3: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 8-8: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 13-13: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 19-19: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
1-22
:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure POSIX compatibility in condition checks
The script uses
[[
for condition checks, which is not defined in POSIX sh. This can lead to script failures in strict POSIX environments.Replace
[[
with[
to ensure compatibility:-if [[ -z "$VITE_DOMAIN" ]] +if [ -z "$VITE_DOMAIN" ] -if [[ -z "$MODE" ]] +if [ -z "$MODE" ] -if [[ -z "$VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL" ]] +if [ -z "$VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL" ] -if [[ -z "$VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME" ]] +if [ -z "$VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME" ]🧰 Tools
🪛 Shellcheck
[warning] 3-3: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 8-8: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 13-13: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 19-19: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
8f7d7d2
to
9d67877
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
apps/workflows-dashboard/global.d.ts (1)
1-3
: Consider runtime type validation for environment variablesWhile TypeScript types provide compile-time safety, they are removed at runtime. Given that this handles environment variables that are crucial for the application's functionality, consider adding runtime validation.
You could use a validation library like
zod
to ensure type safety at runtime. Would you like me to help create a validation schema for the environment variables?Example approach:
import { z } from 'zod'; const envSchema = z.object({ VITE_API_URL: z.string().url(), VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME: z.string(), MODE: z.enum(['development', 'production', 'test']), VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL: z.string().url().optional() }); declare global { export const env: z.infer<typeof envSchema>; }apps/workflows-dashboard/public/config.js (1)
2-5
: Consider environment-specific validationThe configuration lacks validation for required values and environment-specific checks.
Consider adding validation:
const validateConfig = (config) => { const required = ['VITE_API_URL', 'VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME']; for (const key of required) { if (!config[key]) throw new Error(`Missing required config: ${key}`); } if (config.MODE === 'production' && config.VITE_API_URL.includes('localhost')) { throw new Error('Production mode cannot use localhost API URL'); } return config; }; window.APP_CONFIG = validateConfig({ VITE_API_URL: 'http://localhost:3000/api/v1/', VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME: 'local', MODE: 'development', VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL: '', });apps/workflows-dashboard/src/lib/request/request.ts (2)
Line range hint
4-15
: Inconsistent environment variable access patterns.The code uses two different methods to access environment variables:
globalThis.env.VITE_API_URL
for baseURLimport.meta.env.VITE_API_KEY
for API keyThis inconsistency could lead to confusion and potential errors.
Standardize the environment variable access by using
globalThis.env
consistently:export const request = axios.create({ baseURL: globalThis.env.VITE_API_URL, withCredentials: true, }); request.interceptors.request.use(config => { if (config.headers) { - config.headers['Authorization'] = `Api-Key ${import.meta.env.VITE_API_KEY}`; + config.headers['Authorization'] = `Api-Key ${globalThis.env.VITE_API_KEY}`; return config; } return config; });
Mixed environment variable access patterns detected
The codebase shows inconsistent environment variable access patterns in the workflows-dashboard app:
globalThis.env
is used forVITE_API_URL
import.meta.env
is used forVITE_API_KEY
Other apps in the monorepo (kyb-app, backoffice-v2, examples) consistently use
import.meta.env
for accessing Vite environment variables. The mixed usage in workflows-dashboard appears to be an outlier.
apps/workflows-dashboard/src/lib/request/request.ts
: Standardize onimport.meta.env
for bothVITE_API_URL
andVITE_API_KEY
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
4-15
: Verify environment variable access patterns across the codebase.Let's ensure these changes align with the codebase-wide environment variable access patterns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent usage of environment variables echo "Checking for VITE_API_KEY usage patterns:" rg --type typescript "VITE_API_KEY" echo -e "\nChecking for mixed environment variable access:" echo "1. globalThis.env usage:" rg --type typescript "globalThis\.env" echo -e "\n2. import.meta.env usage:" rg --type typescript "import\.meta\.env"Length of output: 554
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent usage of environment variables without type filters echo "Checking for VITE_API_KEY usage patterns:" rg "VITE_API_KEY" echo -e "\nChecking for mixed environment variable access:" echo "1. globalThis.env usage:" rg "globalThis\.env" echo -e "\n2. import.meta.env usage:" rg "import\.meta\.env"Length of output: 7055
apps/workflows-dashboard/Dockerfile (2)
34-35
: Consider using ENTRYPOINT and CMD in shell form for better variable expansion.While the current exec form is generally preferred, for scripts that might need environment variable expansion, consider using the shell form.
-ENTRYPOINT [ "/app/entrypoint.sh" ] -CMD ["nginx", "-g", "daemon off;"] +ENTRYPOINT /app/entrypoint.sh +CMD nginx -g 'daemon off;'
22-35
: Consider optimizing the production image size.A few suggestions to reduce the image size and improve security:
- Add a non-root user for running nginx
- Clean up any unnecessary files after script execution
Here's an example implementation:
+RUN adduser -D -H -u 1000 -s /sbin/nologin nginx_user && \ + chown -R nginx_user:nginx_user /usr/share/nginx/html +USER nginx_userapps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.sh (3)
17-18
: Remove duplicate empty lines.There are unnecessary duplicate empty lines that should be removed for better readability.
fi - - + if [[ -z "$VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME" ]] then VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME=local fi - - + cat << EOF > /usr/share/nginx/html/config.jsAlso applies to: 23-24
13-16
: Improve empty variable assignment.The current empty assignment could be more explicit.
if [[ -z "$VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL" ]] then - VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL= + VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL="" fi🧰 Tools
🪛 Shellcheck
[warning] 13-13: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
27-27
: Improve API URL construction.The current API URL construction might result in double slashes if VITE_DOMAIN ends with a slash.
- VITE_API_URL: "$VITE_DOMAIN/api/v1/", + VITE_API_URL: "${VITE_DOMAIN%/}/api/v1/",apps/workflows-dashboard/package.json (1)
10-10
: LGTM! Consider adding a pre-build step for better organization.The addition of
rm -rf dist
ensures a clean build by removing any stale files. This is particularly important when dealing with runtime variables and configuration files that will be generated during the build process.Consider moving the cleanup to a separate script for better organization:
"scripts": { + "clean": "rm -rf dist", - "build": "rm -rf dist && tsc && vite build", + "build": "npm run clean && tsc && vite build",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
apps/workflows-dashboard/package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
apps/workflows-dashboard/Dockerfile
(1 hunks)apps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.sh
(1 hunks)apps/workflows-dashboard/global.d.ts
(1 hunks)apps/workflows-dashboard/index.html
(1 hunks)apps/workflows-dashboard/package.json
(1 hunks)apps/workflows-dashboard/public/config.js
(1 hunks)apps/workflows-dashboard/src/lib/request/request.ts
(1 hunks)apps/workflows-dashboard/src/main.tsx
(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/index.html
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Shellcheck
apps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.sh
[warning] 3-3: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 8-8: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 13-13: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 19-19: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
apps/workflows-dashboard/global.d.ts (1)
1-3
: Previous review comment about type safety improvements is still applicable
The suggestions about using const
, readonly types, and more specific type definitions would improve the type safety of this code.
apps/workflows-dashboard/public/config.js (1)
1-6
: Verify runtime variable implementation
The PR title mentions "runtime variables", but the values appear to be hardcoded. According to the summary, these values should be dynamically set by entrypoint.sh.
Let's verify the implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the entrypoint.sh implementation to verify how the runtime variables are handled.
Runtime variables are correctly implemented
The implementation is correct. The entrypoint.sh
script dynamically generates the /usr/share/nginx/html/config.js
file at runtime using environment variables. The default values in public/config.js
are just development defaults that get overridden during deployment. The script:
- Sets default values for unset environment variables
- Generates a new
config.js
with actual environment values - The generated file is properly included in
index.html
via a script tag
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if entrypoint.sh properly generates this config file
echo "Checking entrypoint.sh implementation..."
rg -l "config.js" apps/workflows-dashboard/
rg "env\." apps/workflows-dashboard/src/
Length of output: 2280
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check entrypoint.sh content
cat apps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.sh
# Check index.html to see how config.js is included
cat apps/workflows-dashboard/index.html
Length of output: 1182
apps/workflows-dashboard/src/main.tsx (2)
17-20
:
Critical: Improve type safety and configuration management.
The current implementation has several issues:
- Using
@ts-ignore
masks potential type errors - Global variables can lead to maintainability issues
- No validation for required environment variables
The previous review comment suggesting a type-safe implementation with proper error handling is still valid. Additionally, consider these improvements:
-//@ts-ignore
-globalThis.env = globalThis.env || {
- API_URL: import.meta.env.VITE_API_URL,
-};
+interface EnvConfig {
+ API_URL: string;
+}
+
+function validateConfig(config: Partial<EnvConfig>): asserts config is EnvConfig {
+ if (!config.API_URL) {
+ throw new Error('API_URL is required in environment configuration');
+ }
+}
+
+const envConfig = {
+ API_URL: import.meta.env.VITE_API_URL,
+};
+
+validateConfig(envConfig);
+
+// If global access is absolutely necessary
+(globalThis as any).env = envConfig;
Consider using React Context instead of global variables:
// config-context.tsx
import { createContext, useContext, ReactNode } from 'react';
const ConfigContext = createContext<EnvConfig | null>(null);
export function ConfigProvider({ children }: { children: ReactNode }) {
return <ConfigContext.Provider value={envConfig}>{children}</ConfigContext.Provider>;
}
export function useConfig() {
const config = useContext(ConfigContext);
if (!config) throw new Error('useConfig must be used within ConfigProvider');
return config;
}
7-7
: Verify the config.js import mechanism.
The ?url
suffix suggests this is being imported as a URL, which means the file will be copied to the dist folder during build. This approach might not work as expected for runtime configuration.
Let's verify the config file setup:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about how this config file is being used in the codebase.
The config.js import with ?url suffix is working as intended
The current setup is correct and follows a common pattern for runtime configuration in Vite applications:
- The config.js file in public directory defines global environment variables
- The ?url suffix ensures the file is copied to dist and available at runtime
- The configuration is properly consumed in the application:
- Used in request.ts for API configuration
- Initialized in main.tsx with fallback to import.meta.env values
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if config.js exists and its content
if [ -f "apps/workflows-dashboard/public/config.js" ]; then
echo "Content of config.js:"
cat "apps/workflows-dashboard/public/config.js"
else
echo "config.js not found in public directory"
fi
# Check if there are any other similar config files
fd -g "*config*.js" apps/workflows-dashboard
Length of output: 399
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for references to env or config in the codebase
rg "globalThis.env" apps/workflows-dashboard/src -A 2
# Check if there are any other files importing config.js
rg "config\.js\?url" apps/workflows-dashboard/src
# Look for vite.config.js to understand build configuration
if [ -f "apps/workflows-dashboard/vite.config.ts" ]; then
cat "apps/workflows-dashboard/vite.config.ts"
elif [ -f "apps/workflows-dashboard/vite.config.js" ]; then
cat "apps/workflows-dashboard/vite.config.js"
fi
Length of output: 1311
apps/workflows-dashboard/Dockerfile (3)
22-23
: LGTM: Working directory setup follows container best practices.
Setting a dedicated working directory is a good practice for better organization and isolation of application files.
26-27
: Verify the existence and permissions of entrypoint.sh.
The script is copied from the dev stage, but we need to ensure it exists in the correct location.
Also applies to: 30-31
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the content and permissions of the entrypoint.sh file to complete the verification.
The entrypoint.sh script exists and has correct permissions
The script exists at the correct location (./apps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.sh
), has executable permissions (755), and contains valid shell script content for environment configuration. The COPY instruction in the Dockerfile will work as expected.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify entrypoint.sh exists in the repository
if ! fd -t f "entrypoint.sh" .; then
echo "Error: entrypoint.sh not found in repository"
exit 1
fi
Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check content and permissions of entrypoint.sh
ls -l ./apps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.sh
cat ./apps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.sh
Length of output: 737
26-31
: Ensure secure handling of environment variables.
Since this setup involves runtime environment variables:
- Verify that sensitive information is not logged
- Ensure proper error handling in the entrypoint script
✅ Verification successful
Environment variables are handled securely in the entrypoint script
After reviewing the entrypoint.sh script:
- No sensitive environment variables are being logged
- The script has proper fallback values for undefined variables
- Variables are only used to generate a client-side config file with non-sensitive configuration
- The script follows shell best practices for variable handling with proper quoting
The current implementation is secure and doesn't expose any sensitive information through logs or error messages.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if entrypoint.sh contains any logging of environment variables
if fd -t f "entrypoint.sh" . --exec grep -l "echo.*\$.*" {}; then
echo "Warning: Found potential environment variable logging in entrypoint.sh"
fi
Length of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if we can find and read the entrypoint.sh content
fd -t f "entrypoint.sh" . --exec cat {}
Length of output: 594
apps/workflows-dashboard/package.json (1)
10-10
: Verify build process in CI/CD pipeline.
Since this change modifies the build process and involves runtime variables, ensure that the CI/CD pipeline correctly handles the new build flow.
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the Dockerfile for the workflows-dashboard app and any CI configurations that might reference the build process.
Let me check the content of the relevant GitHub workflow file for workflows-dashboard to see how the build process is integrated into CI/CD.
Let me check the build action referenced in the CI workflow to see how it handles the build process.
Build process changes are properly integrated in CI/CD pipeline
The build process modification (rm -rf dist && tsc && vite build
) is safely integrated in both CI/CD environments:
- The CI workflow uses pnpm for building, which correctly executes the new build script through the build action
- The Dockerfile properly handles the build process in both dev and prod stages
- The publish workflow for workflows-dashboard correctly builds and publishes the image with appropriate caching and security scanning
The change is safe as it's just adding an explicit cleanup step before the build, which is a common practice to ensure clean builds.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for CI/CD configuration files that might need updates
# Test: Look for CI/CD config files. Expect: Files containing build configuration
# Search for common CI config files
echo "Checking for CI configuration files..."
fd -t f "^(\.gitlab-ci\.yml|\.github/workflows/.*\.yml|\.circleci/config\.yml|azure-pipelines\.yml)$"
# Search for Docker-related files that might need updates
echo "Checking for Docker-related files..."
fd -t f "^Dockerfile|docker-compose\.yml$"
Length of output: 608
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the Dockerfile content for workflows-dashboard
echo "=== Checking workflows-dashboard Dockerfile ==="
cat apps/workflows-dashboard/Dockerfile
# Search for any CI/CD workflow files in the .github directory
echo -e "\n=== Checking GitHub workflow files ==="
fd -t f "\.yml$" .github/workflows/ || echo "No .github/workflows directory found"
# Search for any references to workflows-dashboard build in yml files
echo -e "\n=== Searching for workflows-dashboard build references ==="
rg -l "workflows-dashboard.*build" -g "*.yml"
Length of output: 1416
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of workflows-dashboard related workflow
echo "=== Checking publish-workflows-dashboard.yml ==="
cat .github/workflows/publish-workflows-dashboard.yml
# Also check ci.yml as it might contain build steps
echo -e "\n=== Checking ci.yml ==="
cat .github/workflows/ci.yml
Length of output: 5440
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the build action content
echo "=== Checking build action ==="
cat .github/actions/build-action/action.yml
# Also check if there are any recent changes to the build configuration
echo -e "\n=== Checking recent changes to build-related files ==="
git log -p --since="1 month ago" apps/workflows-dashboard/package.json apps/workflows-dashboard/Dockerfile .github/actions/build-action/action.yml
Length of output: 8329
Need help in migrating these |
985eed2
to
d54ffc5
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
apps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.sh (3)
15-15
: Add quotes around empty value assignment.Setting an empty value without quotes could cause issues in some shells.
- VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL= + VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL=""
3-6
: Add URL format validation for VITE_DOMAIN.The domain URL should be validated to ensure it's properly formatted before being used.
if [[ -z "$VITE_DOMAIN" ]] then VITE_DOMAIN="http://localhost:3000" fi +# Validate URL format +if ! echo "$VITE_DOMAIN" | grep -qE '^https?://[^/]+($|/.*)$'; then + echo "Error: VITE_DOMAIN must be a valid HTTP/HTTPS URL" + exit 1 +fi🧰 Tools
🪛 Shellcheck
[warning] 3-3: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
1-35
: Consider adding logging and configuration verification.For better operational visibility and debugging:
- Add logging to track which environment variables are using defaults
- Log the final configuration (excluding sensitive data)
- Consider adding a health check that verifies the config file exists and is valid
This will help with troubleshooting container initialization issues.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Shellcheck
[warning] 3-3: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 8-8: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 13-13: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 19-19: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
deploy/.env (1)
32-35
: Add documentation for the new environment variables.Please add comments explaining:
- The purpose and expected values for each variable
- Whether these variables are required or optional
- Any validation rules or constraints
Example format:
+# Domain URL for the application (required) VITE_DOMAIN="" +# Environment name for configuration (e.g., 'production', 'staging') VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME="" +# URL for the company logo image VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL="" +# Application mode (e.g., 'development', 'production') MODE=""deploy/docker-compose-build.yml (1)
81-85
: Consider adding environment variable validation.To prevent runtime issues, consider adding a healthcheck that validates the presence and format of required environment variables.
Add a healthcheck configuration:
environment: VITE_DOMAIN: ${VITE_DOMAIN} VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME: ${VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME} VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL: ${VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL} MODE: ${MODE} + healthcheck: + test: ["CMD-SHELL", "test -n \"$$VITE_DOMAIN\" && test -n \"$$VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME\" || exit 1"] + interval: 30s + timeout: 10s + retries: 3 restart: on-failure
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
apps/workflows-dashboard/Dockerfile
(1 hunks)apps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.sh
(1 hunks)apps/workflows-dashboard/global.d.ts
(1 hunks)apps/workflows-dashboard/index.html
(1 hunks)apps/workflows-dashboard/package.json
(1 hunks)apps/workflows-dashboard/public/config.js
(1 hunks)apps/workflows-dashboard/src/lib/request/request.ts
(1 hunks)deploy/.env
(1 hunks)deploy/docker-compose-build.yml
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- apps/workflows-dashboard/Dockerfile
- apps/workflows-dashboard/global.d.ts
- apps/workflows-dashboard/index.html
- apps/workflows-dashboard/package.json
- apps/workflows-dashboard/public/config.js
- apps/workflows-dashboard/src/lib/request/request.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Shellcheck
apps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.sh
[warning] 3-3: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 8-8: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 13-13: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
[warning] 19-19: In POSIX sh, [[ ]] is undefined.
(SC3010)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
deploy/.env (1)
32-35
: Consider adding validation and default values.
Empty strings as defaults might cause issues if these variables are required at runtime. Consider:
- Adding validation in the entrypoint script
- Providing sensible default values
- Documenting the validation rules in docker-compose and entrypoint files
Let's check how these variables are used:
deploy/docker-compose-build.yml (1)
81-85
: Verify the usage of new environment variables.
Let's verify how these environment variables are being used in the application and the entrypoint script mentioned in the AI summary.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about how these environment variables are actually used.
Environment variables are properly configured and used
The environment variables are well-integrated into the application:
entrypoint.sh
properly sets default values and injects them intoconfig.js
- Variables are type-validated in
schema.ts
- They are actively used in the application:
VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME
for monitoring initializationVITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL
for conditional logo rendering in SignIn pageVITE_DOMAIN
for API URL constructionMODE
for environment configuration
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of new environment variables in the codebase
echo "Checking for environment variable usage in workflow dashboard..."
# Check for VITE_ variables in vite.config files
echo "Checking vite.config files..."
fd vite.config. apps/workflows-dashboard --exec rg -l "VITE_DOMAIN|VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME|VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL"
# Check for environment variable usage in entrypoint script
echo "Checking entrypoint script..."
fd entrypoint.sh apps/workflows-dashboard --exec rg -l "VITE_DOMAIN|VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME|VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL|MODE"
# Check for config.js references
echo "Checking for config.js usage..."
rg -l "config.js" apps/workflows-dashboard/
Length of output: 827
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of entrypoint.sh to see how variables are handled
echo "Content of entrypoint.sh:"
cat apps/workflows-dashboard/entrypoint.sh
echo -e "\nChecking for actual usage of these environment variables in source files:"
rg "VITE_DOMAIN|VITE_ENVIRONMENT_NAME|VITE_IMAGE_LOGO_URL" apps/workflows-dashboard/ -A 2
echo -e "\nChecking config.js content if it exists:"
fd config.js apps/workflows-dashboard/ --exec cat {}
Length of output: 4183
5faebfb
to
1a92226
Compare
dismissing to merge this for the timebeing
28175f9
to
2b1dd66
Compare
Co-authored-by: Alon Peretz <8467965+alonp99@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
entrypoint.sh
script to configure environment variables for the web application.env
for centralized management of environment settings.Improvements
Bug Fixes
Documentation
.env
file and Docker Compose configuration.