remove range limit for stats and log #84
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @dhth, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request refactors how date range limits are managed across the application's reporting and logging functionalities. Previously, certain commands had hardcoded restrictions on the time periods for which they could display data. This change removes those constraints for the log and stats commands, enabling users to retrieve comprehensive statistics and log entries for any desired duration. Concurrently, it introduces a specific, configurable limit for the report command, ensuring that reports remain focused while still allowing for flexible data generation. The underlying date helper functions have also been updated to support this more dynamic approach to date range validation.
Highlights
- Flexible Date Ranges for Log and Stats: The
logandstatscommands no longer impose an upper limit on the number of days for which data can be retrieved, allowing users to query and view historical data without arbitrary restrictions. - Configurable Report Limit: A new
reportNumDaysThresholdconstant (defaulting to 7 days) has been introduced, making thereportcommand's date range limit explicit and configurable. This ensures reports remain concise while still offering flexibility. - Increased Log Entry Limit: The maximum number of log entries displayed has been significantly increased from 100 to 10,000, greatly enhancing the utility of the
logcommand for larger datasets and more extensive historical views. - Refactored Date Helper Function: The core
GetDateRangeFromPeriodfunction has been refactored to accept an optionalmaxDaysAllowedparameter, providing a more generalized and reusable mechanism for enforcing date range limits where specific constraints are desired.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request successfully removes the date range limits for the stats and log commands and introduces a configurable limit for the report command. The changes are well-implemented and include necessary test updates. My main feedback is regarding the command usage strings for report, log, and stats. They were updated to suggest a required PERIOD argument, but since defaults are provided, this argument is optional and should be marked as such to avoid user confusion.
No description provided.