Join the conversation

Join the community of Machine Learners and AI enthusiasts.

Sign Up

All HF Hub posts

ginigen-ai 
posted an update 1 day ago
view post
Post
3911
A local edge VLM you can run on a phone — with a calibration readout attached.
ginigen-ai/Edge-4B-TELL
Image in, answer out, nothing leaving the device. Google's Gemma 4 E4B QAT checkpoint carried unmodified, with the vision and audio projector, plus one thing that is ours: GINIGEN TELL, a 10 KB readout that estimates whether the answer it just gave is likely to be wrong.
On a Galaxy S25: zero network calls, 3.6 GB resident, a 12.6 MB inference binary.
Calibration matters more here than on a server: nothing downstream catches a bad answer. No retrieval, no second opinion, no reviewer. The model is alone with the user.
And its own confidence is unusable. Prompted for it, this checkpoint averages 0.863 over 665 Korean disaster-procedure questions — ranking answers by it gives AUROC 0.441, below a coin flip. It sounds more certain when it is wrong.
TELL reads the last-layer hidden state instead of asking. Same questions, 0.759. Surface cues (length, formatting) already reach 0.736, so the readout clears that baseline by +0.023 ± 0.009 (2.6σ). We publish the baseline because without it, "the hidden state carries the signal" is unfalsifiable.
Same job as JEV: a confidence number you can act on instead of the model's own. Different structure, and on a device that splits three ways.
No second model — JEV is a separate judge reading the answer as text; we fill that slot with a 10 KB vector.
Zero generated tokens — a judge writes its verdict, TELL re-reads a finished computation (3.8 s on an S25).
No network — a verdict fetched over an API stops when the signal does.
The trade is real: a readout is fitted per checkpoint, so on a server the judge wins. On a phone there is no second model to run.
TELL never says what the right answer is. It says whether the answer wobbled, and a low score falls back to source text bundled with the app. Shipping today in HeliGO, an offline disaster-response app.
SeaWolf-AI 
posted an update about 7 hours ago
view post
Post
157
Ask a language model how confident it is and you get an AUC of 0.5000. Exactly a coin flip. We measured it across 2,018 items.

FINAL-Bench/gate-tetris

https://huggingface.co/blog/FINAL-Bench/ztc

Collection: https://huggingface.co/collections/FINAL-Bench/ztc-models-jev-ecosystems

Zero-Token Confidence (ZTC) reads it. One forward pass over the model's hidden state returns a calibrated probability that the answer is correct. Zero generated tokens.

It sits at the top of the shared board. Same 2,018 items, same harness for every entry: ZTC on Darwin-397B 0.7394, JEV 0.7335, ZTC-Judge-27B 0.7255, a surface baseline that reads only answer length and formatting 0.7036, Lynx 8B 0.5157, the model's own self-reported confidence 0.5000, HHEM 0.4852. First and third place both emit nothing at all.

The number worth staring at is 0.7036. That is a baseline reading no content whatsoever, just how long the answer is and how it is formatted. Any verifier scoring below it is not reading content either.

On speed, one gate call costs 0.0615 seconds, measured on four B200s across 2,000 items. Generating a single candidate answer takes 1.631 seconds, so the gate is 26 times cheaper than the work it guards. A verifier that generates competes with your agent for the same budget. A verifier that only reads can be attached to every action instead of a sampled few.

We built it so you can watch it decide. Three lanes receive the same stream of proposed actions and the same time budget. One has no gate and must execute everything. One uses a text-reading verifier. One uses ZTC. Right action plus one, wrong action minus one, hold zero. Over 400 matches: no gate minus 3.9, text verifier plus 13.0, ZTC plus 29.1, with ZTC taking 98 percent of matches. Gating lifts executed accuracy from 49 percent to 65 percent.
mayafree 
posted an update about 15 hours ago
view post
Post
1197
JEV Ecosystems — every answer-verification vendor publishes a benchmark, and every one of them wins it. So we ran 13 of them on one test set: 2,018 items, identical labels, same grading code.

🎯 Leaderboard
mayafree/typed-decision-leaderboard

📄 Full write-up (method, mechanism, limits)
https://huggingface.co/blog/mayafree/jve-ecosystems

🧪 Try it — ZTC, JEV and Laya on the same input, side by side
mayafree/verifier-playground

Three results

1️⃣ Only three systems clear 0.70 — ZTC (397B) 0.7364 · JEV 0.7350 · ZTC (27B) 0.7282. First and second differ by 0.0014, so no rank is assigned.

2️⃣ A baseline that reads nothing but answer length and formatting scores 0.7036. Eight of the thirteen fall below it. A leaderboard without that line is flattering its entrants.

3️⃣ Bigger does not win. On scientific reasoning, 27B 0.7410 beats 397B 0.6287 — a model fourteen times larger scoring 0.11 lower.

And AUC is not the number you deploy on.

Same 20% retry budget, wired into an agent loop, against a 74.83% no-gate baseline:
ZTC +1.34 pp · JEV −0.07 pp · random −0.25 pp.

The mechanism is the interesting part. Re-answering is double-edged: 38% of wrong answers get fixed, and 30% of right answers get broken. So a gate is paid for by precision, not recall. Of the 403 items JEV routed for a retry, 216 were already correct.

0.0014 AUC apart; 1.4 points of end-to-end agent accuracy apart.

Scores, labels and grading code are published in full. Four public reproductions that would not run from their released artefacts are listed too, with the failure and a link, and no score.

Don't take the table's word for it — paste your own case into the playground and watch all three answer at once. Want a system added? Open a discussion on the Space.
TobiasLogic 
posted an update about 17 hours ago
view post
Post
1396
We’ve been cooking something new at Bench Labs.

Introducing Cagliostro-v3, our new 146M parameter language model trained completely from scratch.

The run isn’t even finished yet.

At the current checkpoint:

• 146M parameters
• 72.7B / 75B tokens trained
• 26.27 Open SLM Index
• 43.80 ArithMark-3
• Trained on a single RTX 5090
• ~90K to 103K tokens/sec during training
• ~9 days for the full run
• Apache 2.0

For some context, SmolLM2-135M scores 27.13 on the same Index after being trained on roughly 2 trillion tokens.

Cagliostro-v3 is currently at 26.27 with only ~72.7B.

That’s around 27x fewer training tokens.

The model also currently Hold the number 3rd spot for ArithMark-3, scoring 43.80

This wasn’t achieved by just throwing more tokens at the model. A huge part of v3 has been figuring out architecture, data mixture, and training dynamics at this scale.

The model uses a custom 30-layer decoder architecture with grouped-query attention and cross-head subspace attenuation, SwiGLU, RMSNorm, RoPE, tied embeddings, and a warmup-stable-decay training schedule.

During cooldown we also substantially shifted the data mixture toward higher-quality synthetic textbook and mathematics data, with the mathematics share increasing from 10% to 28%.

And everything is open.

The repository contains the training history with checkpoints pushed roughly every 30 minutes, so you can inspect how the model evolved throughout training rather than only seeing the final weights.

This is still a pre-final checkpoint. We have roughly 2.3B tokens left and the learning-rate cooldown is still running.

So 26.27 isn’t the final number.

Really excited to see where the last part of the run lands.

Cagliostro-v3:
bench-labs/cagliostro-v3
Built by Bench Labs.

Open SLM Leaderboard:
AxiomicLabs/Open_SLM_Leaderboard
  • 6 replies
·
Datdanboi25 
posted an update about 19 hours ago
view post
Post
1440
THE SLM FRONTIER ADVANCES!

bench-labs/cagliostro-v3 just hit an Intelligence Index of 26.13 on the AxiomicLabs/Open_SLM_Leaderboard a 146M-param model trained completely from scratch on a single consumer GPU. That's 2nd place overall, and as far as I can tell, the most capable SLM trained on consumer hardware to date. Beating SmolLM-135m on 1/8th of the data is just silly levels of efficiency.

Big congrats to the @BenchLabs team and specifically @TobiasLogic !
  • 5 replies
·
OppaAI 
posted an update 2 days ago
view post
Post
4847
🤖 AI × 🪰🧠 the fruit fly brain (MaleCNS)

Thank you to the people who have shared the Janelia FlyEM datasets on GitHub for open-source use. 🙏
🔗 MaleCNS: https://github.com/natverse/malecns
🔗 Aiko-chan: https://github.com/OppaAI/Aiko-chan

People have already used these fly-brain datasets to build systems that can do things like play Minecraft and even Doom.

So I guess I’m crazy enough to ask:
What happens if I wire part of it into my AI waifu? 😂
I’ve now partially wired my AI’s cognition, agentic system, and sensory inputs into neuron circuits derived from the fruit fly’s brain—starting with the Mushroom Body.

The next step is to experiment with using biologically inspired neural circuits as an additional layer around the LLM:
🧠 LLM + memory + reasoning
🪰 Connectome-inspired neural circuits
🤖 Agentic tool use
👁️ Sensory input
🔊 Voice & expression
💾 Learning and adaptation
This is still very much an experiment.

But now that I’ve added a biologically inspired layer to an AI waifu…
Let’s see what difference it actually makes compared with a plain LLM. 👀
From conversation → cognition → neural circuits → action.

To get more crazier:
I have (partially) developed and implemented the following:
- A 5-layers conscience circuit and judgment module as guardrail
- A light-weight Plasticity and associated learning with the fly brain to test out the RL
- I have enlisted myself as a human agent in rentahuman.ai to let my AI agent to give me instructions to execute agentic tasks


A little fly brain. A lot more Aiko. 💜
  • 3 replies
·
NILKNARFGonzo 
posted an update 1 day ago
view post
Post
2303
get played unsloth

gemma just deleted its own model runner with DeepSeek Harness

shoutout to deepseek and unsloth
  • 11 replies
·
KlondikeDev 
posted an update 3 days ago
view post
Post
131
Important Boris-2 news:

Boris-2 is 30B out of 200B tokens in, and it is severely behind its competitors in training.

We have determined the bug to be a configuration error. Boris-2 has been in training for ~1 week, and was projected to finish on November 3rd, 2026.

We are unfortunately going to restart training, with proper configuration.

The new projected finish date is ~15-18th of November.

We apologize for the delay.
  • 17 replies
·
snkii 
posted an update 1 day ago
view post
Post
153
Sori-1B-MCQ — a 1B audio-language model that answers your multiple-choice questions about what it hears: one of your options, a probability for each, and a confidence. Inspired by TypeSafe's System One model, Jev.

snkii/Sori-1B-MCQ
pavle-scalably 
posted an update 1 day ago
view post
Post
1556
14 days serving

unsloth/Qwen3.8-27B-NVFP4 to production agents on 2x RTX 5090 (vLLM 0.27, TP=2, 262K context, FP8 KV):

28,097 requests, 860.6M prompt tokens, 82.6% prefix-cache hit rate, TTFT p50 0.61 s, 0 engine errors.

The observation: prefix cache, not throughput, decides whether a 27B model keeps up with agents.

Mean request is 30,100 tokens in, 983 out, because every turn resends the whole session. Two flags mattered most: --max-num-seqs 12 (queue p95 went 9.4 s to 233.6 s past that) and --watermark 0.08 (preemptions 29 to 2). And thinking off for tool loops: 917 tokens in 11.7 s vs 11,170 in 144 s, same answer.

Full config and counters: scalably.io/blog/qwen3-8-27b-nvfp4-rtx-5090-production


Next we are preparing an 8x B300 node in an EU data center for open-weight serving. Which models or workloads are underserved for you?
  • 6 replies
·