Small decisions. Interesting possibilities.Submit contentSubmit

How it uses Jev

Stanley routes a natural-language code task to an eligible workflow, gathers bounded evidence, and asks Jev fixed-choice questions about selected pieces. In the included TODO-audit workflow, each candidate comment is judged against the task; code applies a fixed confidence threshold and reports the result.

What Jev decides

Illustrative TODO actionability questionExample answers · not a recorded Jev response · Source ↗
Question 1 · stale
YOUR APP
INSTRUCTION

Is this TODO comment still actionable?

STATE

A code task and one TODO comment found in `src/app.ts`; the embedded workflow asks one fixed-choice question for each of up to 20 comments.

JEV · CHOICE
  1. actionable
  2. stale
  3. cannot_tell

App workflow

  1. Route the request

    Select an eligible built-in or trusted repository workflow based on the request and deterministic availability gates.

  2. Gather bounded evidence

    Read selected diffs, logs, or repository facts and prioritize what can be checked.

  3. Ask Jev fixed-choice questions

    Classify small pieces of evidence with bounded options.

  4. Apply code rules

    Use deterministic policy and confidence thresholds to form findings.

  5. Report checked scope

    Return findings and identify evidence the workflow did not check.

Why it is interesting

The system separates evidence gathering and thresholds from semantic classification. Its built-in workflow example returns checked findings and explicitly reports the scope it did not inspect.