Small decisions. Interesting possibilities.Submit contentSubmit

How it uses Jev

The Rust CLI and MCP server perform deterministic SEO checks and optional Jev evaluations of content/page state. A fan-out request combines a search-intent Choice, a citation-likelihood Score, a direct-answer Noul, and a content-gap Choice; command-specific questions can be merged into that request. Confidence gates can withhold weak judgments, and a hard Jev budget limits spend.

What Jev decides

Illustrative Jev intent questionExample answers · not a recorded Jev response · Source ↗
Question 1 · intent
YOUR APP
INSTRUCTION

Select the primary search intent.

STATE

Caller-supplied SEO evaluation content, after the client prefilters and truncates it; exact fields depend on the command.

JEV · CHOICE
  1. informational
  2. commercial
  3. transactional
  4. navigational
  5. insufficient_context

App workflow

  1. Collect SEO evidence

    Commands inspect local content or fetched pages and assemble the relevant page, query, or audit state.

  2. Build a Jev request

    The client prefilters and truncates state, then combines the shared semantic questions with command-specific questions.

  3. Gate and consume answers

    The command reads typed results and applies confidence rules; uncertain judgments are marked for verification or withheld.

  4. Report or continue

    CLI/MCP output presents audit findings, GEO and query evaluations, while the run ledger tracks Jev usage under the configured budget.

Why it is interesting

Jev supplies typed evaluations rather than generated recommendations or prose. The tool can preserve a free local-audit path and make semantic scoring an explicit, budgeted addition.