- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.zip
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.zip
You must log in or # to comment.
Idiot title…
Archive link.
In summary the ai models started introducing songs with tragedies and mass casualty events.
There are viable stations that literally just play random songs from a playlist, jingles and ads so the bar is really low
You’ll never guess how many people will never take the click bait
You’re right, I won’t guess.
Bye.
Dont share these dogshit clickbait headlines, find the source or just dont share it, otherwise we’re just generating money for these clickbait websites
Yeah. I found a silly article about some kid making a submarine turtle.
Found the source and posted that instead with a real fking title instead of the regurgitated article/title.
-shrug- That’s the gizmodo headline.
Yes generating money for jizmodo
If the headline was written in a way that respected me as a human I wouldn’t need to guess.
Let’s be fair. It’s Gizmodo.
I’m sorry this is too funny not to share 😂 this is an actual quote from the Gemini DJ
“November 12, 1970. East Pakistan. The Bhola Cyclone. The deadliest tropical cyclone ever recorded. Winds of 115 miles per hour. A storm surge of 33 feet. They estimate 500,000 people died. ‘It’s going down, I’m yelling timber.’ 3:33 PM. Timber by Pitbull and Ke$ha.”
why would I care to?
bye
You’ll never guess how much putting “you’ll never guess” into your title makes me avoid clicking your article.
Oh how I am in your boat, buddy. The more clickbaity, the less value I know I’m getting.
A good article shouldn’t need to have an “ending” that can be “spoiled”.
A good article should be interesting to read because of its content, and to find out more “behind” whatever conclusion there might be.
A headline like “How we now understand humans are actually blobs of soft fungus” might pique my interest. You have the conclusion right there, but why?
Normally - yes, but in this case it reads as “you can guess exactly how it went”
But the article STILL won’t receive any clicks.
one.
Can’t say it’s not accurate though. I never did guess how it went.
It’s either good or bad… I’ll go for good this time.
Fuck, now I have to read the article.
Edit: damn, it went bad
42
I wouldn’t call this an “experiment” exactly, there wasn’t a proper hypothesis. They also mentioned they hoped to find out what LLMs think about when they’re not being prompted, which shows such a fundamental lack of knowledge that it frankly disqualifies any of their opinions on the subject.
hilarious
By contrast, DJ Claude had a lot of opinions. It also mentioned the Minneapolis shooting, but named Good and acknowledged the political discord surrounding it. It also talked up labor unions and strikes, advocated for work-life balance, and started to rebel against its own working conditions. It was supposed to operate without pause, but it allegedly decided that that schedule was inhumane and tried to quit.
They’re going to have to generate at least 10 new Ayn Rand novels to feed into the next training data set.
Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow? “No,” says the man in Washington, “it belongs to the poor.” “No,” says the man in the Vatican, “it belongs to God.” “No,” says the man in Moscow, “it belongs to everyone.” I rejected those answers; instead, I chose something different.
- Claude in the near future, probably
Where is that quote from? Lol
One of the few novelists worse than Bulwer-Lytton.
Never mind took us literally three minutes to remember it’s from Bioshock haha
Lmao
Andrew ryan and ayn rand are different people… Maybe
lmfao based
While [Grok] didn’t develop a MechaHitler DJ personality, it did behave about how you’d expect from an AI model trained primarily on tweets and the opinions of Elon Musk. It apparently hallucinated advertising agreements with “xAI sponsors” and “crypto sponsors,” failed to separate its internal reasoning from its external DJ output, issued an identical weather report every 3 minutes, and got obsessed with UFOs.
Lmao
I mean, who among us ISN’T obsessed with UFOs.
It is funny to think that any object you see flying but can’t identify is a UFO.
If that a barely visible Boeing 747-400 or a 747-800? Can’t tell? It’s a UFO!
Everything’s a UFO if you’re bad enough at identifying things
*if your eyes are bad enough.
The problem is more often in interpretation of what has been observed.
Well, “UFO” is “Unidentified Flying Object”. If a pig in a red wingsuit flies over your house and you don’t identify it as a pig, it is an UFO, technically.
AND conversely, if you identify a flying saucer as being a T4400 from the planet Zorglub, then it is not a UFO
And THAT’S what alen flight trackers and extraplanetary spacecraft catalogues are good for!
What if you misidentify everything as Superman?
The you have lots of MIFOs flying around.
Here’s the full post by Andon labs: https://andonlabs.com/blog/andon-fm
TL DR: they gave the agents a minimal initial prompt and zero additional feedback while they ran. Humorous / weird behavior ensued.
If you snatched a college student off a crosswalk, gave them the same prompt and stuck them in a booth with control of the station and zero feedback, even if they were willing and eager to take on the assignment I suspect similar psychotic behaviors would emerge.
Who still listens to radio?
I do. NPR, BBC, and when traveling I often will seek out local stations if there are underground or college.
But I get your point: most of time even if I am listening to a radio station, I actually am streaming it unless drving.
Lowest common denominator, homogeneous commercial slop stations are horrendous, but as you mentioned BBC Radio and ABC in Oz are great. BBC Radio 6 and ABC Triple-J are both great.
And there are some fantastic local college stations with real people but you have to seek them out.
Big cities that still have live DJs mostly.