Available now · Self-serve
Where are the governance gaps in this workflow?
Answer plain-language questions about one real workflow. The readiness check turns those answers into a score, a risk matrix, and a prioritized list of controls.
Tools · Governance readiness
Know what your AI workflow can prove.
Start with one AI agent, copilot, or automated workflow. In about 10 minutes, get a deterministic view of its governance gaps, receipt readiness, and next controls to address.
10 min
Typical first pass
1 workflow
A bounded starting point
Rule-based
No LLM grading your answers
Choose your starting point
One question. One useful next step.
Pilot access
Need execution evidence for review?
See what an evidence bundle must preserve after governed execution. The public surface explains the boundary; it does not generate a simulated bundle.
Controlled access
Ready to govern one live workflow?
Request a bounded pilot to move from a readiness gap list toward governed execution and receipt-backed evidence.
What the assessment checks
Follow the action from authority to evidence.
01
Authority
Who can approve the action?
Review identity, policy checks, approval paths, and the boundary between a recommendation and an effect.
02
Action
What can the workflow change?
Map the tools, APIs, data access, and external actions that turn an AI output into operational impact.
03
Evidence
What could you reconstruct later?
Check whether policy decisions, approvals, tool calls, and outcomes leave enough evidence for review.
Your output
A gap list your team can act on.
- 01A governance readiness score for one workflow
- 02A risk level with the gaps that drove it
- 03A receipt-readiness score
- 04Recommended controls and practical next steps
Start with evidence