Check the Body, Not Only the Status
Errors such as 401 invalid API key, 402 insufficient credits or 429 rate limited can come back with HTTP status 200, so read the response body before treating a call as successful.
GPT-6.1 Sol is OpenAI's upgrade to GPT-6 Sol, positioned between GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6 Luna, with a 1,050,000-token context window.
Automatically append previous messages to maintain multi-turn context. May increase token usage.
Complete guide to using gpt-6-1-sol
GPT-6.1 Sol is OpenAI's upgrade to GPT-6 Sol, positioned between GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6 Luna. OpenAI describes it as nearly matching Astra on agentic coding, computer use and professional work at a lower price than Astra, and it has a 1,050,000-token context window. On Kie.ai it is available alongside GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6 Luna.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Model | gpt-6-1-sol (responses report the model as gpt-6.1-sol) |
| Endpoint | POST /codex/v1/responses, compatible with the OpenAI Responses API |
| Context window | 1,050,000 tokens |
| Maximum input | 922,000 tokens |
| Maximum output | 128,000 tokens |
| Input types | Text, images and files, mixed in one message |
| Reasoning effort | low, medium, high, xhigh or max; default medium |
| Tools | Web search or function calling, not both in one request |
| Streaming | On by default (server-sent events); set stream to false for a single JSON response |
| Pricing | Shown in the pricing card above |
On OpenAI's own evaluations, GPT-6.1 Sol matches GPT-6 Astra on DeepSWE v1.1 and comes within 2.1 points of Astra on OSWorld 2.0 at maximum reasoning effort, while Astra scored above GPT-6.1 Sol on Terminal-Bench Science 0.1, at 68.1%. Independent leaderboards also put the two close: Artificial Analysis gives Astra 53 and Sol 52 on its Intelligence Index, and LMArena's text leaderboard gives Sol 1484 and Astra 1475 with overlapping ranges (as of October 2026). GPT-6 Luna scores 38 on the same Artificial Analysis index. A practical default is Sol for coding, computer-use and document work, with Astra for the hardest research tasks, which is where OpenAI recommends Astra. On Kie.ai, Sol costs less than Astra; each model's pricing card has the details.
| GPT-6.1 Sol | GPT-6 Astra | GPT-6 Luna | |
|---|---|---|---|
| How OpenAI positions it | Nearly matches Astra on agentic coding, computer use and professional work | Its best model across the board, for when you want the best results | A faster, more affordable GPT-6 model trained with Astra's methods |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (Oct 2026) | 52 | 53 | 38 |
| LMArena text score (Oct 8, 2026) | 1484 | 1475 | 1443 |
| OpenAI-reported comparison with Astra | Matches Astra on DeepSWE v1.1; within 2.1 points on OSWorld 2.0 (max effort) | Scored above GPT-6.1 Sol on Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 (68.1%) | Not reported in the GPT-6.1 Sol release |
| Available on Kie.ai | Yes | Yes | Yes |
OpenAI built GPT-6.1 Sol as an upgrade to GPT-6 Sol for agentic coding, computer use and professional work such as understanding documents and running multi-step business workflows. These are the results OpenAI reports against GPT-6 Sol.
| Benchmark (OpenAI-reported) | What it measures | GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE v1.1 | Complex software-engineering tasks in real codebases | 6.4 points above GPT-6 Sol's best score, at a lower reasoning effort |
| AutomationBench | Multi-step business workflows | 4.8 points higher at medium reasoning effort |
| OSWorld 2.0 (offline set) | Demanding computer-use workflows | 7 points higher at maximum reasoning effort |
| Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 | Data analysis, simulation and theorem proving | More than double GPT-6 Sol's score at maximum reasoning effort |
| Factuality evaluation | Share of answers with at least one factual error | 11.4% to 7.7% at low reasoning effort, on deliberately difficult prompts that are not representative of typical usage |
OpenAI built GPT-6.1 Sol for complex professional work. These are the kinds of tasks it was built for.
Writing, debugging and reviewing code in real codebases, where an agent works through complex software-engineering tasks.
Questions answered from long PDFs with tables, charts, diagrams and fine print.
Agents that carry a business task through several steps across different apps.
Agents that operate computer applications to complete multi-step tasks.
Errors such as 401 invalid API key, 402 insufficient credits or 429 rate limited can come back with HTTP status 200, so read the response body before treating a call as successful.
One request can use web search or your own function tools, not both. When you pass function tools, set tool_choice to auto; without function tools, leave tool_choice out.
Responses report the model as gpt-6.1-sol, with a dot, while requests use gpt-6-1-sol. If your code checks the model field, accept the dotted form.
All models in the Kie.ai market use the same authentication method: an Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY header with the key from your Kie.ai API Key Management page.
New Kie.ai users receive 80 free credits for testing. Your account has one credit balance that all generation services draw from, and you can check it with the Get Remaining Credits API.
Kie.ai provides this model as an API with a playground; there is no app to download or install. There are no GPUs or model weights to manage.