• 15 Posts
  • 1.33K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 1st, 2024

help-circle
  • And even then, they generally don’t wanna watch amateurs, semi-pro, or low league pros. Can only be the national/world leagues or nothing at all.

    Almost as if they don’t really care about sport but instead are using it as a means to be part of a group, to have a cultural link with others. A shame sport culture is mostly brainrot pundits constantly waffling shite like “they really wanted to win this one” as if they’re not trying to win every time. No moment of silence and just watching the spectacle allowed. Constant punditry, hours of pointless analysis before and after every game.

    Not to mention the constant hype as if each match is the most important of all time

    https://youtu.be/MusyO7J2inM

    Watching amateur sport is far more interesting IMO. Less predictable, more exciting, no bullshit punditry, more passion for the sport.







  • McTernan was Prime Minister Tony Blair’s Director of Political Operations from 2005 to 2007. He then worked on the November 2007 Australian Labor Party federal election campaign.[1] From 2007 to 2010 he was special adviser to two Cabinet Ministers in Gordon Brown’s Labour Government: first to Des Browne, Secretary of State for Scotland and Secretary of State for Defence,[2] and then to Jim Murphy MP, the Secretary of State for Scotland from 2008 until May 2010. From June 2010 to October 2011, he was a columnist at The Scotsman, and then director of communications for the Australian Labor prime minister, Julia Gillard, from September 2011 to June 2013.[3] He was chief of staff to the 2014–2015 leader of the Scottish Labour Party, Jim Murphy, who resigned after the Labour Party lost all but one seat in Scotland, including Murphy’s, in the 2015 general election.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McTernan

    McTernan can sod off.





  • From what I understood, I think they’re reasoning is that Ireland must remain neutral in international conflicts, as has been Ireland’s stance since 1922. So by providing a bat to one party they’re taking a side and breaking a century long policy of neutrality.

    They see that one side is the aggressor, so they’re still willing to aid the other with food, medicine, clothing, etc but draw a line at weaponry.

    Like I said in my other comment, I’m not sure which side I agree with, but they certainly don’t sound opposed to others providing weaponry, just they themselves would rather provide other forms of help.

    To stick with your analogy, we generally wouldn’t call out a wee nurse not getting involved in two big blokes having a punch-up if they then ran in and treated the victims wounds. Ireland is only 5 million people and has suffered at the hands of imperialism, having The Troubles as recently as the late 90s. They know bloodshed, an eye for an eye, and the escalation of violence.

    To make clear, as this can be a very emotional topic. I’m not taking a side (irony), just trying to explain their reasoning.



  • Today, only former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn emerges from the scandal as vindicated by his principled stance opposing New Labour’s support for US imperial wars and corporate influence.


    But the record is clear: throughout the two-year genocide Streeting loyally stuck with Starmer’s policy of maintaining the alliance with Israel, avoiding serious action over its crimes, offering military and diplomatic support, while making performative criticism to distance Labour from the horrors committed by its ally in Gaza.


    Numerous MoD officials had recently joined Palantir - and pressure is mounting on ministers over what looks like state capture by a Trump- and Israel-linked US surveillance firm.


    The project built by McSweeney around Starmer, aided by his mentor Mandelson, was brittle, authoritarian, factional and paranoid, as well as sexist and racist.


    It cared nothing for the victims, be they trafficked women and children, or the Palestinian men, women and children of Gaza. It suspended black and Muslim female MPs for the slightest infraction.

    But… But… But I have been repeatedly told that Labour are pro-worker and lefty liberal loonies! Even by Lemmy members who have signed up to servers that promote anarchism. Have I been lied to? Could it be that the pro- capitalism neo-liberals aren’t in fact left wing at all?

    I’m shocked, shocked I tell you!

    Next you’ll be telling me that all they really care about is wealth and power.


  • In 1992, Meloni joined the Youth Front, the youth wing of the Italian Social Movement (MSI), a neo-fascist political party founded in 1946 by followers of Italian fascism. She later became the national leader of Student Action, the student movement of the National Alliance (AN), a post-fascist party


    Some observers have described Meloni’s political positions as far right,[254][255] and have highlighted her campaign appearances with Rachele Mussolini.[256]


    In an interview to the French newscast Soir 3 when she was 19,[400] she praised Italian dictator Benito Mussolini as “a good politician, in that everything he did, he did for Italy”,[401][402][403][404] and as the best politician of the last 50 years.[405]


    After the formation of FdI in 2012, she decided to add the tricolour flame to the party flag, a neo-fascist symbol associated with the MSI, which derived its name and ideals from the RSI.[416] The tricolour flame is said to represent Mussolini’s remains, where a flame is always burning on his tomb in Predappio.[417]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giorgia_Meloni

    Press X to doubt.




  • You think it’s fair to hear corporate lobbying on the use of the word ‘milk’ in reference to a product that has existed since the early 1990s without confusion? Despite massive backlogs being such a national issue that prisoners are being released early, jury trials are being scrapped, and the current government campaigned on it…

    Going through multiple courts, using up multiple clerks, lawyers, and judge’s time?

    And that’s fair?

    And now this non-milk milk, which every layperson refers to as milk, can no longer be labeled milk, despite everyone likely to continue calling it milk.

    That is a fair use of limited court time and salaries?