You’re wrong. This is a depiction of something that doesn’t exist and hasn’t existed in the last 2 centuries. Yet this is what the far right is obsessed about. That is called propaganda.

That is irrelevant to the matter.

By this I mean that it’s a step forward and a step backward. The good things don’t remove the bad ones.

Yes indeed. But the season before that it showed us a planet were romulan migrants took over the planet they took refuge on and made an apartheid for them.

There are a few good things in Picard. There are also a lot of terrible things.

You’re still talking about one of the most individualistic society one can imagine. And if someone is given property of land, it cannot be communism. Or socialism for that matter.

It’s in the name you know? Communism or socialism are about doing things together. That’s the polar opposite of you being alone on your private, self sustainable kingdom.

The two theoric basis for that are the Maxwell equations and the electromagnetic force equation. It should not be overly difficult to process that. But after that, it’s engineering, and there there are many, many moving parts.

That is the opposite of communism, because you are thinking on the basis that everyone should be able to live alone, by itself, on its own property. You’re describing some kind of libertarian nightmare here.

Kamala Harris number makes a gauge for the proportion of maga brainwashed people.

When you look at the numbers, you can gather that most far left propositions probably come from maga supporters.

You can derive from that that only 4% of non maga consider Sanders as far left.

That is a small thing. Meanwhile in Picard you have have the most boomer takes you can get : technology bad, young are brainwashed, fate,… I haven’t seen any science after season 1, and I haven’t seen any progress.

I don’t know about knives, but in fencing sword, the first target is the hand and arm, not the belly. The hand is as close to you though for any size of your opponent.

A tall opponent has a longer reach, so that is what you need to be wary of in fencing. It means it does have a advantage to attack. But once the blades crossed, the advantage is gone, and the you have the advantage bellow your taller opponent. Because you have more room for movement in the two blades space than your opponent. You are committed there though, because getting away from the situation will be harder.

A French youtuber did a study on porn, to see if it was violent as lawmakers make it seem. And as a matter of facts, the titles and tags rarely represent what it actually is.

My guess step mom is a side category to milf.

Of those things, only one will reliably work though.

The fun thing is that those supposed cross platform framework also require a full team for each platform.

That’s such bullshit! Those supposedly cross platform shit are the least compatible softwares you can make! What can of idiot can pretend it’s used because of Linux?

The fact he is old is actually more dangerous to US democracy than if there was decades ahead of him.

When time passes, a dictator is caught up by politics, and his power decrease because other factions will have consolidated their power so an equilibrium that satisfies all factions is necessary, and is thus more complex than a dictatorship.

If it’s too soon after the start of the dictatorship, then the chaos still reign, and power still fall in the hand of the one who controls armed forces. Which is usually the last dictator alive after the succession war.

Everything goes down to what your army will be loyal to.

Social networks like lemmy or reddit have now replaced the forums in my experience, for the better or the worse.

Why is Israel word between quotes?

Développe : les deux ça veut dire quoi ?

Parce que là, tu prônes exactement ce que je critique. Avec ces critiques, les entreprises ont le monopole de ces outils, et les lignes sont tracées sur des questions symboliques complètement inutiles, voir rétrogrades ou qui les arranges.

Parce que les questions de pudibonderie, on fait pas beaucoup plus conservateur et en général ce sont les religieux, conservateurs ou fachos qui défendent ces idées. Qu’est-ce qu’on gagne à tracer la limite à l’usage romantique des IA ? Absolument rien. Les emplois remplaçables seront quand même remplacé, et c’est toujours derrière un carcan de brevets et de droits d’auteurs que vous allez même maintenant défendre. Qu’est-ce qu’on gagne a bannir ou limiter la pornographie ? Absolument rien. Les femmes du milieu sont toujours exploitées et le business tourne toujours autant.

Je parle pas de grand soir. Je parle de ce qu’on peut obtenir maintenant : des outils puissant qui vont redéfinir le travail. À la place vous prônez de laisser ce rôle aux entreprises, mais attention, on touche pas au sexe.

Si le problème c’est l’entreprise qui collecte les données, pourquoi les attaques ciblent-elles les IA plutôt que les entreprises ?

Quand au risques fasciste, est-ce que c’est pas un peu hors-sujet quand l’UE passé une loi pour surveiller les conversations chiffrées ?

Je vois tellement de problèmes dans tous ces combats contre les IA ça le désole. Comme si on devait se battre pour des miettes de libertés après avoir accepté de perdre la plupart d’entre elles, et souvent dans une optique très pessimiste.

La c’est typiquement un combat du même accabi que celui contre le porno. C’est de la pudibonderie. Défendre les droits d’auteur des artistes contre les IA, c’est défendre les droits d’auteur qui sont un des pires carcans capitaliste de notre société. Défendre le travail des gens face aux IA, c’est défendre le pseudo-esclavagisme auquel on est réduit.

Et si on se battait pour un meilleur plutôt ? Un monde dans lequel les IA et toutes les technologies n’appartiennent pas aux entreprises mais servent la société à la place, pour améliorer nos vies, nous libérer du travail, ou nous aider à faire face aux défis du XXIeme siècle. Ou on abandonne tout espoir face au capitalisme ?