I’ve got mixed feelings about this one. Gonna re-read it a few times. I don’t know much/anything about this philosopher, so I may also do some delving there.

But, I think the question posited by this statement is a productive one:

There does not seem to be much reason to suppose that phenomenology should wink out while a reasonably complex perceptual psychology persists…

Closing keynote at the UIST and SPLASH conferences, October 2014. Preface: http://worrydream.com/TheHumaneRepresentationOfThought/note.html References to baby-steps…

Thinking doesn’t just happen in our heads. When faced with a problem, we rarely sit perfectly still and just think. Instead, we interact with the world around us. We move around the room, talk to other people or to ourselves, write notes, draw diagrams, build prototypes, act out scenarios. We externalize the thinking process. Each externalized thought forms a model—a simplified representation that allows us to preserve, communicate, or reflect on the thought.

\<blockquote>Collection of thinking tools and frameworks to help you solve problems, make decisions and understand systems.\</blockquote>