We should update our labeling laws to require manufacturers to use the amount a consumer could reasonably extract. If you have a wide mouth transparent container with smooth insides, a rubber scraper can get it all. If you have a narrow mouth squeeze bottle, then only count what squeezes out. Maybe manufacturers would shift to more efficient packaging, or maybe consumers would accept higher unit cost for more convenience. The important thing is aligning incentives: pay for what you can use.

This makes perhaps too much sense LOL.

This is a good introduction to hate speech as a legal phenomenon, with emphasis on social media and college campuses. Exposed me to a lot of useful viewpoints.

Only the well-to-do folks who never interacted with it before seem surprised at the injustices of the legal system. And those who choose to complain about how that system treats Donald Trump are choosing a rather odd place to begin complaining.

In January of 2005, following meetings between Chris Klicka and the Department of Defense, homeschoolers were again “afforded priority enlistment with no practical limit”