The Battle at Apache Pass

The Battle At Apache Pass is dependent on its verisimilitude for the notion that most Americans are ignorant of the fine points of the true story of the various American Indian wars. Broken Arrow took place in the early 1870s and it's where Tom Jeffords and Cochise formed a peace pact that included all the Apaches except those followers of Geronimo.

In this prequel the Civil War has come and a lot of soldiers are ordered back to fight in the east. Some ambitious people on both sides like Geronimo for the Apaches and Bruce Cowling a political hack Indian agent with ambitions to be territorial governor try to break an informal peace established by the friendship of Major John Lund and Cochise as played by Jeff Chandler who returns as Cochise. Jay Silverheels as Geronimo is the only returnee from Broken Arrow.

The Battle At Apache Pass is not in the same league of greatness as Broken Arrow, but it still is a pretty good western. If the film has a moral it is blessed are the peacemakers because they have their work cut out for them. It doesn't take much to start a war, but a lot of work and sacrifice is needed to end one. There are enough examples in real life right down to today to affirm that notion.

Through it all Lund and Chandler retain a mutual respect for each other and both are afforded the opportunity to save the women that each other loves, Beverly Tyler for Lund and Susan Cabot for Chandler.

Besides those I've already mentioned, standing out in the supporting cast is Jack Elam at his squinty eyed evil best as a scout working for Cowling and Richard Egan as a tough, but compassionate sergeant. His scenes with Susan Cabot where he shows her a world of respect as due the first lady of a nation have a lot of depth to them.

Not as good as Broken Arrow, but still a fine western The Battle At Apache Pass holds up very well for today's audience.

This is a good cavalry Western, with a respectable cast and well photographed. John Lund may have got top billing, but Jeff Chandler has the better screen presence, and possibly Richard Egan too.

It contains a couple of common minor flaws of Westerns of the 1950s: the uniforms and carbines relate more to the 1870s than the early Civil War period, and Susan Cabot is yet another white American actor/actress who doesn't convince as a native American, especially compared with the "real Indian" women who briefly appear. Chandler is more convincing as Cochise,and complements well the Canadian Indian actor Jay Silverheels, best known as Tonto in the Lone Ranger series, where he always struck me as being a bit wooden; here he gets some dialogue and a couple of good fights (which he loses)) as Geronimo.

There's a suggestion of an instant romance between Lund and Beverly Tyler as the wagon-train survivor, but this is so feeble it might as well have been omitted.

The action scenes are well handled, especially the climatic battle in Apache Pass.

Apache chief Cochise (Jeff Chandler) resolves to make a treaty allowing his people to live in peace with white settlers. However, his hot-headed fellow leader Geronimo disagrees, and puts the negotiations at risk by embarking on a murder spree, incurring the wrath of his enemies.

A big moneymaker in its day, and its understandable why. It ticks all the boxes in delivering an engaging action western with plenty of conflict thrown in; the buildup to powder keg situation where Cochise has to fight against the cavalry - an Indian agent played by Bruce Cowling and Mescal Jack played by Jack Elam stir up an Apache war - is well done.

Jeff Chandler reprises his role of Cochise, whom he played in Delmer Daves' Broken arrow, and plays the role with dignity and command. John Lund is fine as the sympathetic cavalry officer. Susan Cabot and Beverley Tyler are ravishing.

A solid western with a beautifully shot location.

And also a BROKEN ARROW sequel; in other terms one of those westerns for which the Indians were not the villains all the time. Splendid settings for the Universal Studios movie. It brings nothing new compared to other westerns of this kind, with more or less the same message. It is very well made, by a real professional George Sherman, a western specialist who began his career in the late thirties for Republic Pictures, in B westerns, as so many other B directors ( but in the early fifties), such as RG Springsteen, Harry Keller, Thomas Carr, whilst other directors like William Witney, in the early fifties too, proceeded their career, working for Republic Studios, still for the same kind of B westerns, after his highlight serial period, between the late thirties and forties. Awesome battle sequences, breathtaking moments for the audiences.

I didn't realize that this film merged a couple of real-life situations, so this scores points. It's the Cavalry versus the Indians, both of whom have some battle tricks up their sleeves. Can the Cavalry escape from the might of the combined Apache tribes after some devious shenanigans from both sides ruin a peace plan?

The cast carry out their roles well, apart from some wooden acting from Tommy Cook (Lillle Elk) who plays the brother of Cochise. Jeff Chandler (Cochise) does a good job as the Apache Leader and Jay Silverheels (Geronimo) is suitably ruthless as the rogue Apache warrior. Jack Elam (Mescal Jack) is also memorable as the weasel with no moral compass.

There are some interesting landscapes and moments of tension with good use made of the location to achieve this - a memorable scene has the Apache warriors just standing stationary as they wait for the glare of the sun to obscure the vision of the trapped Cavalrymen before they launch an attack. And it's all filmed in Technicolour which is always worth a point for a film.

I read a few reviews that said that "Broken Arrow" (1950) was a better film. How is that, then? Let me correct this for anyone reading. This is better than "Broken Arrow" which is essentially just a love story between a way-too-old James Stewart and a far-too-young Debra Paget.