Battle at Bloody Beach

Small-scale story of individuals caught up in a giant war, as opposed to a big WWII blockbuster. Low-budget black and white movie, but that's OK since it is not a blockbuster. However, the combination of low budget, poor script and below-average direction prevents this film from being worthwhile. It appears to have been filmed very quickly, maybe in a matter of days or a couple of weeks.

Audie Murphy has a lot of screen "presence" and he elevates what is otherwise not much here. Dolores Michaels is great as always and very watchable. Her leading-lady talent is far above this insignificant movie. Alejandro Rey is watchable as he again elevates one of his many B-movie roles and TV appearances (he had a remarkable ability to do this).

The cheap California island location filming is surprisingly adequate as a substitute for the real would-be scene of the action.

Can't really recommend this, but the movie's stars outshine the material and are individually fine.

Audie Murphy was actually a better actor than he was usually given credit for--he did excellent work in "The Red Badge of Courage" and his own biography, "To Hell and Back"--but you couldn't tell by this low-rent war picture. Murphy pretty much walks through the picture, although co- star Alejandro Rey tries to breathe some life into it. The sloppy direction, poor script, overacting by Gary Crosby (as usual), tired performance by a tired-looking Dolores Michaels and its overall cheesiness combine to make this picture definitely one of Murphy's lesser efforts. A burst of not particularly well done action at the end can't really save it. The ending is predictable, trite and not even remotely believable. Overall, pretty much of a dud.

What is there to add regarding this cinematic failure? It has a lot to dislike, including it's terribly written script; vacant, dull and useless film space, and lack of convincing combat. Without a doubt, it is one of Audie Murphy's worst choices -- to act in this horribly boring, low budget flick.

Just why do well known actors do this? Maybe Audie was in dire need of the little cash this part provided him. I tell myself, had I known him personally, that I could have taught him how to manage his finances and to resist gambling. He could have been amazingly well situated, free from the need to pick up the spare change such cheap diversions earned him; but, we must not forget, he fought an inward battle as well with PTSD, which can halt a man's perspective of his entire history: past, present and future. He will do anything to attempt to rid himself of his thoughts when he's alone.

Still, we continue to hold Audie Murphy dear, and are always willing to give him praise and honor no matter his choices. Why? Because he truly was a hero. An inwardly torn one, for sure, yet still a notable figure.

Had someone in his life known more, maybe that person could have helped him, saved him from his own destructive thoughts and behaviors. Unfortunately, so little was truly understood of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in those days, which, even today, men and women, victims of having experienced life in harm's way, continue to battle within themselves.

After working nearly thirty years in a VA hospital, I've seen men return home with it. Relationships suffer, insomnia takes a toll, and poor habits and addictions latch hold. Withdrawing from the world may also set in. Whatever the symptom, these men deserve our lasting respect and honor.

I was at the premiere of this movie in San Diego. And yes, it was a pretty awful movie. In fact, I can not remember any thing about the movie. So why am I writing this review? Because I knew Audie Murphy, and was on the location set while filming aboard the submarine. Audie was not in the best frame of mind during this movie, often looking depressed. Even the camera man was concerned. But when called to do his scenes, Audie did his best. As for the movie itself, I can only guess it is best forgotten, because I am certain Audie never included it in his best performances. I don't think it is on DVD, and probably never will be. The battle at bloody beach was also part of the battle going on in Murphy's head.

I am very surprised that Audie Murphy agreed to star in "Battle at Bloody Beach", as he had a very bad case of PTSD after fighting in WWII. Sure, he earned more medals than any other American in the war, but he also paid a huge price...and his PTSD was so bad it contributed to his first marriage dissolving. So, in light of his mental illness, it's not 100% surprising that he had a few other troubles in life...including many financial ones. It was so bad that after a while, he went from making relatively high budgeted films (mostly westerns) to making cheaper and cheaper movies. "Battle at Bloody Beach" is certainly one of the cheaper ones.

A few signs this is a very cheap movie is that instead of filming it in the Philippines, they chose nearby Catalina Island...just a short distance from Hollywood. Another is that the women in the movie all sport 1961 hair (particularly the lead) and they made little attempt to make it look like a period piece. Additionally, Murphy is given little in the way of support...with mostly unknowns and Gary Crosby, who, at the time, wasn't exactly a star.

The story is set around late 1943-sometime in 1944. Craig Benson (Murphy) is on a mission where he is going island to island recruiting the locals for the insurgency against the Japanese. At the same time, and a VERY weak part of the film, is that he's also looking for his wife who got separated from him at Manila at the beginning of the war. And, naturally, he finds her here...which seems pretty ridiculous. But there are problems...and the mission ends with a bloody battle on the beach...hence the film's title.

I agree with the one review that describe this as a stiff and talky picture--it is. I think a bit more action might have helped and less of the love story as well. Still, it's not a terrible low budget film...just one that's easy to skip.

By the way, two bad things that stood out where the scene was when one of the insurgents yells out "NO!! Blanco ends here" as he pretty much throws away his life instead of getting on the boat with everyone else. The other, and I'm surprised that Murphy didn't complain about this, is that they are fighting the Japanese with Browning Automatic Rifles...a sort of rifle/submachine gun hybrid. It could fire, at most, 20 rounds...but here you never see anyone reloading and they are firing it on full automatic most of the time instead of in single-shot mode. I'm not a big expert on guns but have fired the BAR and know the film didn't seem to care if it was being used realistically or not. Of course, perhaps Murphy DID say something but the director simply didn't care. Who knows?