The Brain

I just got myself an old issue of FANGORIA and they had an interview with Freddie Francis inside. It had been quite a while since I had watched a Francis horror film, so I figured why not try one of his films. I watched this one, which was his first horror film (2nd to date) he ever directed. Is it good? Not really. I would say that Francis' work does get leaps and bounds better after his initial horror film. Like TALES FROM THE CRYPT (1972) or THE DOCTOR AND THE DEVILS (1985). Maybe any true Freddie Francis fans might enjoy it more.

Brilliant Dr. Peter Corrie (Peter van Eyck) is conducting experiments on brains to try and further his knowledge in the field. He is working on a monkey's brain in the beginning of the film, which in one shot kind of looks like a watermelon. With the assistance of Dr. Frank Shears (Bernard Lee's next role after he had played M in DR. NO) he gets a hold of a still working brain within a dead body. Turns out it belongs to tyrannical tycoon Max Holt. During the film Holt and Dr. Corrie's brain are on the same wavelength, so Dr. Corrie knows things he shouldn't. In the end it turns into a murder mystery to solve his murder.

Sadly a mixture of good ideas with some kooky ones, which may have to do with it being a B-Movie from the early 60s, so it adds some silly sci-fi angles to things which are not believable. The whole murder mystery element when added really does suck a lot of the horror out of the picture. A blend of two genres that does not really work.

Also starring JacK MacGowran as Furber, who may be the most interesting character in the whole movie. He is aware of Dr. Corrie's theft of Max Holt's brain and is looking for payment to keep quiet.

An adaptation of film noir legend Curt Siodmak's novel, Donovan's Brain, The Brain offers up a murder mystery narrative to go with the mad science angle. It's not particularly thrilling but it does tick along nicely and director Freddie Francis has a keen eye for scene staging. Cast features Peter Van Eyck, Anne Heywood, Cecil Parker and Bernard Lee, and they all do what is required to make the material work. Stand out moments involve some delightfully monstrous paintings, a lie detector scene and all the sequences where Van Eyck is possessed by the brain of the powerful industrialist who was murdered by person or persons unknown. Good and safe "B" schlocky fare for the so inclined. 6/10

If the science fiction elements were absent from this film, it would have been a good film noir movie. A remake of "Donovan's Brain", "Ein Toter sucht seinen Morder" (American title: The Brain), falls between two stools. In it, a scientist keeps alive the brain of a dead colleague while keeping the fact a secret from dead man's relatives who he suspects of murdering him; he turns detective and investigates.

The brain is kept alive in what looks a formalin-filled tank with wires sticking out of it - amateurish, but in keeping with the low budget science fiction films of that era. The film noir camera work is excellent as are the other film noir elements in this flick. The movie has a fast pace most of the time. Peter van Eych's acting is wooden at best and he looks too old for the part.

Worth watching if you are into old science fiction films of that era.

(Reviewed by Sundar Narayan)

There's a certain class of genre flick, seen especially but not exclusively in the 40s or 50s, that ably presents ideas of horror and science fiction but is less able to evoke any strong feelings about the material. Such fare can still be enjoyable on its own merits provided that one is receptive to genre elements that are more thematic than they are actualized. Even with iconic director Freddie Francis on board, I don't think there's much mistaking that 1962's 'The brain' can be described in such terms. We're treated to notions of unsanctioned experimentation, consciousness separated from corporeality, metaphysical communication and manipulation, and questions of identity and ethics - in addition to, of course, murder. And all of it is made to be scarcely more compelling than if we were reading the screenplay itself. I do actually like this, but it definitely reflects a more restrained sensibility of film-making that somewhat limits its potential and the size of its audience.

Or maybe we modern viewers are just too cynical and jaded, or so desensitized to ever-increasing intensity and violence that the storytelling older titles have to offer just can't faze us. After all, there's a delightful aspect of mystery to the proceedings as protagonist Dr. Corrie undertakes an investigation of sorts into the death of millionaire Holt. All those notions that comprise the genre elements do come to bear at different times, to different degrees. Between the effects and art direction, the admirable acting, some smart scene writing and dialogue, and Kenneth V. Jones' music that accentuates select beats, the creepy edge of the story does lightly shine through, and the greater vibrancy that some moments bear. Why, one way or another some scenes are kind of brilliant, and there is much to appreciate here on its own merits. 'The brain' is well made in every regard, including not just those facets I've already mentioned but also Francis' direction, Robert Huke's cinematography, and Oswald Hafenrichter's editing.

While Bernard Lee(!) is the cast member who enjoyed the most broad visibility, Peter van Eyck's role as protagonist Corrie easily gives him the biggest spotlight, and he takes fine advantage of it to illustrate his skills. That's hardly to count out the other actors, all of whom capably help to bring the tale to life. There is perhaps a point to be made that the picture mostly carries itself as a fairly straight crime thriller and mystery, with noir tinges, and the titular organ and subsequent story ideas are just flavoring. Moreover, even at under ninety minutes, it starts to feel before it's all over as if the whole experience has run a little long. Be that as it may the narrative is compelling, with splendid scene writing - and the reveals at the climax, and the ending, are unexpectedly gratifying. No matter how you look at it this is no exemplar by any standard, and it's nothing one needs to go out of their way to see. Modern viewers who have a harder time engaging with older flicks can probably just pass this right on by. Still, 'The brain' is suitably entertaining, and if you do have the chance to watch, it's not a bad way to spend a quiet afternoon.

While 'Donovan's Brain' wasn't the first movie version of Curt Siodmak's sci fi shocker, it is by far the best known and best remembered of the three adaptations (so far). As a corny but entertaining b-grade movie it is hard to beat, and wonderful fun. 'The Brain', an overlooked German/English remake, doesn't try to outdo it, it instead approaches the source material in a very different way. The sensationalistic thrills and mind control horror of the 1953 movie are replaced by a calmer, more atmospheric style which adds a mystery element not seen in the earlier version. The basic premise is the same (though the names have been changed). This time around the scientist experimenting with keeping monkey's brains alive outside the body is played by Peter van Eyck ('Wages Of Fear'). He is assisted by his beautiful wife (well, I think it's his wife) Ella (Ellen Schwiers, who is positively stunning, and a lot easier on the eye than Nancy Davis!), and his trustworthy alcoholic sidekick (Bernard Lee, 'M' of James Bond fame). Once again a plane crashes nearby and the sole survivor is taken back to their lab. Once again the man cannot be saved but the scientist decides to keep his brain. As in 'Donovan's Brain' the brain survives and begins to exert control over the scientist. But it isn't in the same way, it is much subtler, and instead of domination, the brain wants something else - justice. For in 'The Brain' the millionaire has been murdered, and most of his family and associates are suspects. This interesting twist, plus the superior cast, makes this movie a rarity - a worthwhile remake. However, I wouldn't go so far as to say it surpasses the earlier movie. It is less silly and more intelligent, but not necessarily more entertaining. I enjoy both movies in different ways, and recommend them both.