A British agent investigates mysterious accidents plaguing the SST1 supersonic airliner project. With help, he discovers Petersen using robot-like women and infrasound weapons for sabotage, ... Read allA British agent investigates mysterious accidents plaguing the SST1 supersonic airliner project. With help, he discovers Petersen using robot-like women and infrasound weapons for sabotage, motivated by an £8M deadline bet.A British agent investigates mysterious accidents plaguing the SST1 supersonic airliner project. With help, he discovers Petersen using robot-like women and infrasound weapons for sabotage, motivated by an £8M deadline bet.
Featured reviews
Deadlier boring than "Deadlier than the male"
A Remake of the Movie "Deadlier Than the Male"
Easy On The Eyes Entertainment
And if you like this one then try its predecessor film. The "Chicks" in these two films put todays' sour looking super-models and centerfolds to shame. The Movie industry just doesn't have the same level of beauty in their female actors anymore as they try to relate too much to a female audience to the great disappointment of the male audience.
If like me you fall asleep during chick flicks and would love to watch a movie made just for guys then enjoy this one.
Dick Johnson is back for more....
During the course of the film, various acts of sabotage are made on the SST-1 project (the 'SST' was an early name for what became the Concord project in the UK and France). In each case, a pretty woman is behind the attack. If this sounds a bit familiar, this is because it's much like the plot of Johnson's other Drummond flick, "Deadlier Than a Male". However, Drummond is not alone in investigating the sabotage- -a kooky and sexy lady assistant (similar to Britt Ekland in "The Man With the Golden Gun") is there as well. Also WHY and HOW these ladies work are a bit different from the previous film...as they are robotic in their actions and loyalty.
While this film is a decent spy-type film, it's less original than the last. Additionally, the film relies on two bad clichés ALSO found in the last film--the megalomaniac baddie who, instead of just killing Drummond, keeps him around supposedly to give him a chance to kill him AND all women (even robotic ones) find Drummond so sexy that they cannot control themselves. It's a shame, as the film is pretty good otherwise. All this plus the robotic aspect make this one far, far inferior than Johnson's prior effort.
Better than most modern movies. Very under rated
Drummond is also targeted when flying a glider and is meant to crash down when his parachute has been tampered with by the beautiful robotic women who watch from below, but manages to skillfully and successfully release open the parachute, landing down safely as if nothing had happened.. A fine performance by Sydney Rome as the typical James Bond type girl, but Drummond is not at all fooled by her pampering and charming behaviour, as he is very intelligent in sensing her motives.. She does play the bimbo but is very cunning, as most Bond style girls are.
In a nutshell I did enjoy this movie and am not surprised that any criticisms are really more to do with it's comparisons to modern released movies. However, I am very surprised that the character of Bulldog Drummond was not pursued in later years like with remakes of `A Thomas Crown Affair', `The Avengers', `The Saint' etc. I believe that the character of `Bulldog' Drummond could have been further modernized and made into a big hit in the late 1970's upto the 1990's with newer adventures, as it had all the charm and character of serving action/adventure style movies, but on a larger scale. I would have kept one foot in the 1960's and another one in the 1990's keeping that style in an evergreen sense.
Did you know
- TriviaRichard Johnson turned down the role of 007 in the first Bond film, Dr. No (1962), opening the door for Sean Connery.
- Quotes
Carl Petersen: History repeats itself. Napoleon dreamt of the entire universe thronging to his door. Now I shall fulfill his dreams.
Hugh Drummond: Dressed as the Duke of Wellington?
Carl Petersen: Well of course my dear fellow. Never back a loser.
- ConnectionsEdited into Monty Python's Flying Circus: How Not to Be Seen (1970)
- How long is Some Girls Do?Powered by Alexa








