IMDb RATING
7.0/10
3.3K
YOUR RATING
An aging cowboy realizes that the West he knew and loved will soon be no more--and that there will be no room for him, either.An aging cowboy realizes that the West he knew and loved will soon be no more--and that there will be no room for him, either.An aging cowboy realizes that the West he knew and loved will soon be no more--and that there will be no room for him, either.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
Raymond Guth
- Sunfish Perkins
- (as Ray Guth)
John McKee
- Petey Williams
- (as John R. McKee)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
A Modern classic spearheaded by an intelligent script, excellent performances, beautiful photography and an outstanding score. Lee Marvin is at his rugged best in the title role with typical solid support from Jack Palance, who is excellent here cast against type. That this great western was finally released on DVD LONG after the REMAKE is just wrong. And I do not mean that as a slam against the Tom Selleck/TNT version which was a well done rehash that I also enjoyed. MONTE WALSH stands beside WILL PENNY as 2 pillars of the "vanishing cowboy" genre. It seamlessly morphs from action to pathos, poignant to laugh-out-loud funny. One of Lee Marvin's best roles.
This is a nice film to watch on a rainy evening. Lee Marvin and Jack
Palance did as good a job of acting that I have ever seen them do.
The supporting cast is full of wonderful career action character
actors who you would recognize if you watched a lot of films and
TV in the '70's.
I borrowed the tape from a relative after seeing the remake by TNT
and though I think the remake was better, this was for it's time
pretty good. The way movie progresses noticed a lot of scenes
seemed choppy and there must have been a lot left on the cutting
room floor.
Lee Marvin looked like he was playing his typical Marvin character,
but Jack Palance was likeable and I believe did a better job and
even portrayed his character better than Carradine did in the
remake and Carradine did a great job.
Though it's a "tear-jerker" it's one that tells a story that's not unique
to just the "Cowboys" of the 19th and early 20th century. There are
periods in history when due to evolution of civilization, lifestyles are
phased out or altered due to change of professions needed to
exist.
My appreciation of Mama Cass' singing increased when I heard
her sing the title song. She really had a fine voice, it was a plus
that she sung the lead-in rather someone like Joplin. In fact
before I saw her credits in the lead-in I thought the singer was one
of the great singers who had sung a James Bond movie title song.
Palance did as good a job of acting that I have ever seen them do.
The supporting cast is full of wonderful career action character
actors who you would recognize if you watched a lot of films and
TV in the '70's.
I borrowed the tape from a relative after seeing the remake by TNT
and though I think the remake was better, this was for it's time
pretty good. The way movie progresses noticed a lot of scenes
seemed choppy and there must have been a lot left on the cutting
room floor.
Lee Marvin looked like he was playing his typical Marvin character,
but Jack Palance was likeable and I believe did a better job and
even portrayed his character better than Carradine did in the
remake and Carradine did a great job.
Though it's a "tear-jerker" it's one that tells a story that's not unique
to just the "Cowboys" of the 19th and early 20th century. There are
periods in history when due to evolution of civilization, lifestyles are
phased out or altered due to change of professions needed to
exist.
My appreciation of Mama Cass' singing increased when I heard
her sing the title song. She really had a fine voice, it was a plus
that she sung the lead-in rather someone like Joplin. In fact
before I saw her credits in the lead-in I thought the singer was one
of the great singers who had sung a James Bond movie title song.
So says Monte's friend as they sit on a front porch, wondering what they'll do now that their way of life is coming to a close. One of the most touching and poignant westerns ever made, "Monte Walsh" is a love poem written to a way of life that only lasted about 20 years, but defined much of American culture. The cowboy period only lasted from about 1865 to 1885, and this film shows several friends who have been cowboys for most of that time, deeply in love with their work, who see it all ending, and are powerless to stop it. Barbed wire fence and one really hard winter (which really did happen, and single handedly changed the western cattle industry, and eradicated the cowhand) do away with their blissful existence, forcing them to confront themselves. What do they do now? It isn't always pretty, and the decisions they make when the chips are down tell you most everything you need to know about human nature. The wonderful theme song by Mama Cass Elliot "The Good Times Are Coming" is just marvelous, and perfect for the film. All in all, one of the 5 best westerns ever made, and the absolute best one dealing with the working cowhand culture. Don't watch this movie if you are embarrassed about crying, because it will break your heart. Truly a work of art. The words "I rode down the gray" will haunt you for the rest of your life.
I heartily agree with the other enthusiastic reviews of this movie, so instead of repeating their comments I'll just add a couple of notes which I didn't see in anyone else's remarks.
One thing that really drew me into this movie was how, over and over, I would be watching a scene play out and there would be a _very_ few words exchanged, with minimal "dramatizing music" or other "play-ups" adding dramatic weight, and I'd just ache for more words to be said. So much was happening _to_ the characters (mostly internal, as the film focuses more on people than events) and they went through it with such a minimum of dialogue. That made a strong impression on me as it left me wanting more; wishing somehow they could make it alright by just saying more of what was obviously on their hearts.
Another thing I loved about this movie was the distinctiveness of the characters. One had false teeth; one rarely (if ever) bathed; one was called "Shorty"; and, of course, the unforgettable mugs of Palance and Marvin -- and the distinctiveness of these wasn't all simply in their appearances. Before long they started to feel like my own friends. My heart broke watching their whole world pass them by.
One thing that really drew me into this movie was how, over and over, I would be watching a scene play out and there would be a _very_ few words exchanged, with minimal "dramatizing music" or other "play-ups" adding dramatic weight, and I'd just ache for more words to be said. So much was happening _to_ the characters (mostly internal, as the film focuses more on people than events) and they went through it with such a minimum of dialogue. That made a strong impression on me as it left me wanting more; wishing somehow they could make it alright by just saying more of what was obviously on their hearts.
Another thing I loved about this movie was the distinctiveness of the characters. One had false teeth; one rarely (if ever) bathed; one was called "Shorty"; and, of course, the unforgettable mugs of Palance and Marvin -- and the distinctiveness of these wasn't all simply in their appearances. Before long they started to feel like my own friends. My heart broke watching their whole world pass them by.
10cinecarl
Here's a case of Palance putting in a great supporting role like he has done so often, a truly selfless actor with a great humility.
Seldom does an actor allow himself to look as pathetic as Palance does in his performances. This is a great film, primarily due to the metaphor near the end where Marvin tries to tame a horse, frustratingly attempting to control the nature of all things around him. The austere writing and stilted acting lend to the overall tone, creating an elegiac western greatly under-appreciated in its time. One of those small, offbeat movies awash in a decade of so many sparkling little films, each challenging the strictures of Hollywood. I loved it.
Seldom does an actor allow himself to look as pathetic as Palance does in his performances. This is a great film, primarily due to the metaphor near the end where Marvin tries to tame a horse, frustratingly attempting to control the nature of all things around him. The austere writing and stilted acting lend to the overall tone, creating an elegiac western greatly under-appreciated in its time. One of those small, offbeat movies awash in a decade of so many sparkling little films, each challenging the strictures of Hollywood. I loved it.
Did you know
- TriviaLee Marvin was a notorious drinker so William A. Fraker banned him from drinking during the making of the film.
- GoofsFightin' Joe Hooker, the cowboy riding fence, says he rode with Joseph Hooker when he led the Army of the Cumberland at the battle of Lookout Mountain during the Civil War. General Joseph Hooker did not lead the Army of the Cumberland. He was in command of the XI and XII Corps of the Army of the Potomac and was sent west to reinforce the Army of the Cumberland, which was under the command of General George H. Thomas at the battle of Chattanooga, of which the battle of Lookout Mountain was part.
- Quotes
Chet Rollins: Nobody gets to be a cowboy forever.
- Crazy credits"Introducing Mitchell Ryan"
- ConnectionsEdited into Go West, Young Man! (2003)
- How long is Monte Walsh?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $5,000,000 (estimated)
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content