A painter and his wife move into a home and find themselves plagued by ghosts and spirits of his ancestors that used to be witches.A painter and his wife move into a home and find themselves plagued by ghosts and spirits of his ancestors that used to be witches.A painter and his wife move into a home and find themselves plagued by ghosts and spirits of his ancestors that used to be witches.
Jim Storm
- Gerard Stiles
- (as James Storm)
Captain Haggerty
- Bald Henchman
- (uncredited)
Robert Singer
- Henchman
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
5.41.9K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Not great, but it has it's charms
This is the 2nd film inspired by the late 1960s gothic soap opera Dark Shadows. Having done a bang-up job with the first movie (House of Dark Shadows), they decided to go a different direction here.
There is no lead vampire Barnabas Collins. There is, however, a great setting in a big famous old house that has gothic fun written all over it! This setting, and the fine performances by David Selby, Kate Jackson, Lara Parker, and Grayson Hall help immensely.
The story and final product, however, suffer due to major studio-ordered edits. We are left with a poorly strung together and not very scary narrative, and only an occasional mild chill. Too bad, because Dan Curtis knows how to make beautifully-filmed gothic stories, but his hands were tied and the result is disappointing. It's worth a look for curiosity factor and setting, for fans of the series, and for the great cast.
There is no lead vampire Barnabas Collins. There is, however, a great setting in a big famous old house that has gothic fun written all over it! This setting, and the fine performances by David Selby, Kate Jackson, Lara Parker, and Grayson Hall help immensely.
The story and final product, however, suffer due to major studio-ordered edits. We are left with a poorly strung together and not very scary narrative, and only an occasional mild chill. Too bad, because Dan Curtis knows how to make beautifully-filmed gothic stories, but his hands were tied and the result is disappointing. It's worth a look for curiosity factor and setting, for fans of the series, and for the great cast.
Flowers of evil, mists of Angelique
Perhaps few fans would agree, but I actually find this a more satisfying film than the predecessor, House of Dark Shadows. The script is more interesting--even with all the cuts (depending upon which version of the original script you consult, something like an hour of the final cut running time was excised, and MGM only gave Sam Hall and Dan Curtis one working day to make the cuts). There is still more character development in this film than in House of Dark Shadows. The cast is excellent, with a great chemistry, thanks to the fact that they had all worked together for several years on Dark Shadows as an ensemble before they made this film. Standouts include the young David Selby in the dual role as Quentin and Charles, Lara Parker as the evil Angelique, and John Karlen and Nancy Barrett in minimal roles as the young couple in the cottage. Grayson Hall is, as always, in a league of her own as Carlotta Drake, the Mrs Danvers-like housekeeper. With her elegant wardrobe and sinister glances, Grayson gives this film an alluring atmosphere of lingering evil waiting to pounce upon the bored and feckless yuppies who stumble into her web. Thayer David makes a great deal out of the small role of Reverend Strack. James Storm is pretty much wasted in the role of Gerard. Diana Millay, Clarice Blackburn, and Christopher Pennock have memorable little cameos. The score by Robert Cobert features the beautiful love theme (originally titled "Joanna" and used in the final season of Dark Shadows) which lends an air of wistful romance to the otherwise flat onscreen relationship between Selby and Kate Jackson.
Too bad the harried writer and producer didn't manage to film in the climactic seance sequence; in the theatrical trailer to the film, included on the laser disc version, you can see a couple of brief moments from this.
Too bad the harried writer and producer didn't manage to film in the climactic seance sequence; in the theatrical trailer to the film, included on the laser disc version, you can see a couple of brief moments from this.
A Gothic classic!
Many DARK SHADOWS fans who saw this dislike it because of the eleventh hour editing that MGM insisted on before the release date-drastic cutting.As it remains,a cool 70s gothic horror story is still there to enjoy.There is so much haunting atmosphere and brilliant camera work,along with top-notch acting,to sustain interest.I felt confused at points,due to the savage cutting,but still felt totally absorbed.This movie is like bizzaro DS!Character's names sound familiar,but that's it.This is a fresh story utilizing the DS TV series universe.
MGM KILLED NIGHT OF DARK SHADOWS
In 1975 I was a freelance writer in New York. During that year I was honored to interview stage and screen actress and one of the stars from Dark Shadows, Grayson Hall. It was during this interview that I learned why NIGHT OF DARK SHADOWS was such a bad film.
The late Ms. Hall related a story which told of how MGM called her husband, "Dark Shadows writer" Sam Hall and told him that he would have to fly out to California and edit out nearly 30 min. from his latest film. After his sad task was done he returned home and shortly thereafter the film was released. It was not up to the standards the the series nor MGM's hit from just the year before "House of Dark Shadows" had. The idea was excellent. Dialog well written, stylishly photographed and wonderful performances from the cast. The problem was the fact that the feature made little sense. It plotted along for 90 min's filled with questions and vagueness.
However, the good news is that most of the edited footage has been found and is now in the process of being re-edited. Night of Dark Shadows, through the popularity of the series, is in a sense going to be re-born. Sam Hall's work shall now be seen as it was created. Perhaps then we will be able to appreciate this classic haunted house story, the way it should be, without studio butchering.
The late Ms. Hall related a story which told of how MGM called her husband, "Dark Shadows writer" Sam Hall and told him that he would have to fly out to California and edit out nearly 30 min. from his latest film. After his sad task was done he returned home and shortly thereafter the film was released. It was not up to the standards the the series nor MGM's hit from just the year before "House of Dark Shadows" had. The idea was excellent. Dialog well written, stylishly photographed and wonderful performances from the cast. The problem was the fact that the feature made little sense. It plotted along for 90 min's filled with questions and vagueness.
However, the good news is that most of the edited footage has been found and is now in the process of being re-edited. Night of Dark Shadows, through the popularity of the series, is in a sense going to be re-born. Sam Hall's work shall now be seen as it was created. Perhaps then we will be able to appreciate this classic haunted house story, the way it should be, without studio butchering.
Atmospheric Sequel to House of Dark Shadows
Night of Dark Shadows was Dan Curtis' follow-up to the immensely popular movie from the hit soap opera Dark Shadows. This movie reinforces many known facts about sequels. Sequels always have much to overcome. They are invariably compared to the original. If the movie is a carbon copy of the first, it's criticized for being un-original. If it takes a different road, the public laments that it's not what they wanted. Dan Curtis deserves much never received praise for taking an entirely different road to Collinwood this time and risking the public's ire. At the time of it's release, Night of Dark Shadows received undeserved criticism for being slow and disjointed. The probable reason for this was that Dan Curtis was forced to edit Night down to a double-feature friendly running time, so much of it's plot and character explanations landed - guess where - on the cutting room floor. However, if one really watches this film closely, they will be richly rewarded with a delightfully moody and atmospheric haunted house/possession/witchcraft flick that will send chills where they should go during a horror flick. David Selby is stoic and forboding as Quentin and Charles Collins, and Kate Jackson is the embodiment of purity and goodness as Tracy. Grayson Hall plays Carlotta with sheer relish. She's the kind of housekeeper that motivates one to become a better housekeeper, so that we can one day fire her. Lara Parker will make you forget to inhale or exhale as Angelique. Her beauty is indescribable, as is her ability for evil. John Karlen returns as Quentin's best friend Alex, and Nancy Barrett is approachable yet truly seductive as Alex's wife Claire. They are simply a joy to watch together. Once again, the elegant Lyndhurst mansion is the perfect home for the Collins family, this time a haunted one. If you haven't seen Night of Dark Shadows yet, give it a try. If you have and weren't impressed the first time, give it another chance. It deserves that much - and you'll be glad you did.
Did you know
- TriviaFeature film debut of Kate Jackson.
- GoofsNear the beginning, Quentin goes to bed wearing gold (or yellow) pajamas. Then in his nightmare sequences that follow the pajamas are blue.
- Quotes
Carlotta Drake: There is no longer any place for Mrs. Collins.
- Alternate versionsThe original director's cut of Night of Dark Shadows was screened for MGM executives at 128 minutes. Unhappy with the running time, studio head James Aubrey ordered director Dan Curtis to cut around 40 minutes out of the picture, as it was considered a B-programmer. Curtis was given only 24 hours to re-cut the picture, and the 97 minute version was approved by Aubrey. The picture was press screened at that length, but afterward an additional 4 minutes were cut from the picture without Dan Curtis' consent, probably in order to guarantee a GP rating (1971's PG equivalent) as all of this material cut was violent or sexually suggestive in nature. During release some of the preview (97 mins) prints were accidentally circulated and still show up today, probably through private collectors as the 97 min prints are no longer held in MGM's archive. Dan Curtis' 128 min original version has been considered lost and presumed destroyed for decades, but film historian Darren Gross unearthed the sole existing material for this version in August 1999. Plans for restoration and release of this version are currently being formulated.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Cinemacabre TV Trailers (1993)
- How long is Night of Dark Shadows?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Curse of Dark Shadows
- Filming locations
- Lyndhurst Estate, Tarrytown, New York, USA(Collinwood)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $900,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 35m(95 min)
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content






