IMDb RATING
5.3/10
2.5K
YOUR RATING
Two girls on the run get lost in the French countryside, and wind up in a haunted chateau occupied by an ailing vampire and his servants.Two girls on the run get lost in the French countryside, and wind up in a haunted chateau occupied by an ailing vampire and his servants.Two girls on the run get lost in the French countryside, and wind up in a haunted chateau occupied by an ailing vampire and his servants.
Marie-Pierre Castel
- Marie
- (as Marie Pierre Castel)
Mireille Dargent
- Michelle
- (as Mireille D'Argent)
Agnes Jacquet
- La première victime des vampires
- (as Agnès Jacquet)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
5.32.5K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
decent enough Rollin from his peak period
One of Rollin's best, although lacking the stylish gaudiness of his earlier masterpieces. However, considered as the work of an impressively productive director with about as many misses as hits, this film holds a high ranking in his oeuvre. He starts smash dab in the middle of obviously complicated unexplained criminal events, with the two female protagonists done up in ludicrous clown costumes. After the death of their fellow fugitive, they set fire to their car and wander off into the woods. Dark, young beauty Mireille Dargent stumbles into an open grave and ends up covered in opened dirt as nearby Marie-Pierre Castle watches, too scared to speak. Once unearthed, she and her friend find a seemingly abandoned castle with a decomposing body in the basement. Some uninspired vampires bring the girls to their dungeon of depravity. Dying vamp Philippe Gasté, the last of his kind in great need to make more with the help of vamp pal Anne-Dominique Toussaint, gives them a wee bite. They're somewhat uncertain about this idea of slowing turning into the blood-sucking undead, but things head in unexpected directions from here in typical Rollin style, if typical can be described as such. Although many of Rollin's women find themselves thrust unexpectedly into a world of evil, a close inspection of their characters from the beginning suggest a previous loss of innocence. Rollin's women do not succumb to these influences - indeed, they generally escape from their perilous situations - but it's important to remember that this sort of behavior may well not be old hat to them. Requiem uses extremely effective pacing, which many mistake as boring. Some extremely long takes contain little distinguishable action, denying the audience a passive film experience. This style of filmmaking instead demands total audience involvement, with only occasional instances of the glossy seduction suggested by the film's pretext. Rollin's decision to spend so much screen time on seemingly aimless wandering evokes a misguided spiritual quest, with obvious sexual connotations in the form of vampires. The experimental score by Pierre Raph, who worked with Rollin on the notorious Démoniaques, compliments this uncertain, possibly confused journey. In stark contrast to these rather profound elements stands the unnecessarily graphic sexual torture that goes on the castle's dungeon. This goes to an unnecessary extreme - I can't, for example, imagine anyone enjoying the image of a bat nestling in a woman's vagina. However, movies do need a target audience and Rollin could easily have chosen a worse genre into which to work his ideas. After this film, Toussaint began her career as a producer.. Dargent and Castle, prototypical Rollin girls, appeared in several other of his films.
Vampires, Clowns and Naked Women
A vampire lures beautiful young women dressed as clowns to his castle in Europe.
How many movies have both clowns and vampires? How about clowns with guns? French clowns with guns? And that is only five minutes into a film that has some of the sexiest women Jean Rollin has featured exhibiting his own brand of eroticism (some of which clearly borders on rape).
Being from Rollin, are we surprised that this film faced censorship? The scene where Mireille Dargent is whips Marie-Pierre Castel has two versions. As does the scene where Castel and Dargent make love and the scene where Dargent is being chased by the man. I suppose that two questions can be asked: should we have a director change his vision for decency? And, is there any real purpose to having the women be nude? I will not answer either one.
I would say this film is overall better and more finely constructed than "The Nude Vampire", and has far more cohesion than "Rape of the Vampire". I mean, this one actually has a clear set of heroines and a plot!
How many movies have both clowns and vampires? How about clowns with guns? French clowns with guns? And that is only five minutes into a film that has some of the sexiest women Jean Rollin has featured exhibiting his own brand of eroticism (some of which clearly borders on rape).
Being from Rollin, are we surprised that this film faced censorship? The scene where Mireille Dargent is whips Marie-Pierre Castel has two versions. As does the scene where Castel and Dargent make love and the scene where Dargent is being chased by the man. I suppose that two questions can be asked: should we have a director change his vision for decency? And, is there any real purpose to having the women be nude? I will not answer either one.
I would say this film is overall better and more finely constructed than "The Nude Vampire", and has far more cohesion than "Rape of the Vampire". I mean, this one actually has a clear set of heroines and a plot!
S10 Reviews: Requiem for a Vampire (1971)
Two lovely ladies are on the run (why? I'm not sure} and find shelter in a rather Gothic, sprawling castle in the French countryside. They soon run into the lord of the manor, an aged vampire looking to use their luscious, virgin (yeah, right!) bodies as vessels for his progeny. A lot of flesh, a bit of bondage and a touch of lesbianism punctuate another erotic horror masterpiece from French filmmaker Jean Rollin.
It's somewhat hard to recommend a Rollin film to the uninitiated. Often surreal but almost always beautiful, thanks in part to the lovely ladies frequently in the buff and the photography pf the locations. Rollin clearly has an eye for beauty. However the plots and story lines are often very slight. Heck there is hardly any dialogue in the first thirty to forty minutes of 'Requiem'. But man does he have an eye.
It's somewhat hard to recommend a Rollin film to the uninitiated. Often surreal but almost always beautiful, thanks in part to the lovely ladies frequently in the buff and the photography pf the locations. Rollin clearly has an eye for beauty. However the plots and story lines are often very slight. Heck there is hardly any dialogue in the first thirty to forty minutes of 'Requiem'. But man does he have an eye.
Surreal film
This film was rated higher by others than I would have thought. Vampires usually do a lot of biting and blood sucking. There was more erotic virgin handling and molestation than biting and the like in this one. The use of silence in the film gave it a surreal quality. The whole movie was dream-like. The lure of the victims was not captured. The chase and seduction is the best thing about vampires but those subtleties were lost here. But, I must admit, the film did remind me of Vampyros Lesbos and, to a lesser extent, Suspiria. I must state that vampire films do not have to be bloody etc. But a little blood at the bite would have been welcomed. Not a bad watch if you seek those who walk at night.
Early Jean Rollin Is Not as Good
I have come to the conclusion that this director maintained his own style yet evolved over the years of his film making. Lips of Blood is excellent if not fully coherent, but Requiem for a Vampire - in the same series as The Shiver of the Vampires - is an excuse to make stylish erotica, including controversial scenes of sexual assault.
The first half of this film is mainly a stream of consciousness flow of beautiful and striking images, while the second half is more focused on sadism and nudity.
Two teen girls who were apparently employed as clowns (remember: performance art careers like being a mime, including studying the art at colleges, were still common circa 1970s France) have since fallen into a life of crime, quite spontaneously. The audience is never informed of what exactly happened, but the viewer can imagine something along the lines of a bank robbery or other forms of grand theft, leading to a car chase and a shoot out. Their driver and male companion is murdered in the process, while the girls escape. They burn his body along with their vehicle to hide evidence.
It is made evident that these aren't innocent victims, so this film borders on later morality horror seen in slasher films from the 1980s in the US. They are bad girls, seducing men so that they can steal food and cigarettes, gleefully enjoying the process until they realize they're sleeping rough in a cold rural cemetery.
Stumbling upon the ruins of a chateau, the girls are spooked by the rotting corpse of an apparent suicide victim whose face has been eaten by birds while the body hangs limply from a rope. Stupidly, they waste ammunition on shooting at the corpse, highlighting their youth and immaturity (or maybe just an excuse for Jean Rollin to film gun shots?)
It is all downhill from there, when they encounter the rapey vampires.
The first half of this film is mainly a stream of consciousness flow of beautiful and striking images, while the second half is more focused on sadism and nudity.
Two teen girls who were apparently employed as clowns (remember: performance art careers like being a mime, including studying the art at colleges, were still common circa 1970s France) have since fallen into a life of crime, quite spontaneously. The audience is never informed of what exactly happened, but the viewer can imagine something along the lines of a bank robbery or other forms of grand theft, leading to a car chase and a shoot out. Their driver and male companion is murdered in the process, while the girls escape. They burn his body along with their vehicle to hide evidence.
It is made evident that these aren't innocent victims, so this film borders on later morality horror seen in slasher films from the 1980s in the US. They are bad girls, seducing men so that they can steal food and cigarettes, gleefully enjoying the process until they realize they're sleeping rough in a cold rural cemetery.
Stumbling upon the ruins of a chateau, the girls are spooked by the rotting corpse of an apparent suicide victim whose face has been eaten by birds while the body hangs limply from a rope. Stupidly, they waste ammunition on shooting at the corpse, highlighting their youth and immaturity (or maybe just an excuse for Jean Rollin to film gun shots?)
It is all downhill from there, when they encounter the rapey vampires.
Did you know
- TriviaJean Rollin claimed to have written the treatment in one impromptu burst, stacking incidents on top of each other with little care for plausibility or any other connective tissue.
- GoofsAt the beginning, when the clowns are pouring the gas over the dead friend, you can see him move several times, including twitches and breathing.
- Alternate versionsThe film was rejected for UK cinema by the BBFC in 1972. It was finally released on video in 1993 by Redemption after extensive cuts of 6 minutes 55 secs to heavily edit shots of chained women in a cellar being stripped and raped by vampires, and a scene where Marie is whipped by Michelle.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Celluloid Horror (2004)
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Caged Maidens
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 5m(65 min)
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.66 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content








