The Devil's Lover

Three women stay the night at a castle supposed owned by the Devil - in the night, one of them has a dream where she is transported to the 16th century where a bunch of odd events take place.

The main selling point of this movie has to be Rosalba Neri. This Italian actress appeared in a number of genre films from around this time and always added quality to proceedings, in terms of her sensuality, sexual forcefulness and genuine acting ability. She's probably the best thing in this film too. Its an example of an Italian gothic horror film, at the latter end of the sub-genre's cycle. And on paper it does include a lot of promising elements - sexual deviants, vampires, religious fanatics, a red-hooded devil, a witch, beautiful maidens and ornate, crumbling locations. But director, Paolo Lombardo, was hardly a master at this kind of thing and, in fact, only helmed a further two minor films. The result is a fairly lethargic picture on the whole, with the odd interesting moment. If you like Italian gothic, it is certainly good enough for a whirl and Neri is always worth seeing in anything.

I saw this on a recent, as of 2024, blu ray release and was shocked when I went to IMDB to discover that I guess I'd seen it. Now how could I forget the film, well after watching it I can see how. It's not memorable. I had given it a 6 but I've revised that more to a 4.

The problems are the script and directing, both by the same man who seems to have little talent at either. The performances are just ok, no one seems very committed to a role, other than Neri. There are a few really beautiful shots of her, how could there not be?, but she's had better parts and looked better in much better films.

There is very little style and the shots at times barely cut together. The music score is pretty good but it stops and starts at odd moments sometimes in mid scene, it all feels like no one with much experience was at the helm of the movie.

For something that's supposed to be shocking, the violence and nudity are few and far between, not a problem if the drama is compelling, but it's not.

There is one laughable scene with a red hooded guy popping, like in Bewitched, in and out in various places. The editing is sluggish so you can tell one actor is freezing in place while the other moves and they start shooting again. It's really half heartedly done.

There is a sword fight and well, uh, that's about it, I guess there sort of is another sword fight eventually.

It's all rather flatly done and pretty dull, for a film called The Devil's Lover the whole devil angle is also dull and almost silly the way it's done. A film that doesn't know how to be erotic horrific or compelling, decent production values raise it above worse films, but it looks like what it is, a producer directing and not knowing how.

In the Severin 2024 release there is an interview with actor Robert Woods who claims he was brought in to try to save the movie, to edit the film, be in it in a small role added later and to direct some of it. Even with all that he says it's not better than just ok and I'd agree.

The 2024 release looks and sounds very good, features a dull commentary track with lot of silence between not too interesting things to say.

The heyday of the Italian Gothic Horror genre was the early-to-mid-1960s; even so, the style lingered on well into the next decade but the results were often far beneath what could be accomplished at its best. Naturally, this is one such example: actually, we start off here with a contemporary setting and the heroine ("Euro-Cult" favorite Rosalba Neri) dreams herself back at least two centuries – under the influence of an old mansion where, legend has it, the devil used to reside! An element these later efforts certainly took advantage of was the relaxation in censorship, except that then we tended to get copious nudity at the expense of plot (and even atmosphere): at one point, for instance, a couple of nubile girls are gang-raped and forced to copulate between themselves inside a cave, a sequence that has no bearing whatsoever on the central plot! For what it is worth, the narrative involves two girls (one is Neri and the other is played by a companion of hers in the modern 'bookends') who both love the same man; when he chooses Neri, the rival (herself pursued by another, played by Robert Woods) turns to a witch who puts a curse on the former. This results in Neri being seduced by a stranger (Edmund Purdom), losing her lover to him and getting burned at the stake for the latter's death…all on her wedding night and, surprise surprise, the interloper is eventually revealed to be Old Nick himself! While the lethargic pacing is decidedly characteristic of such fare, the inept handling is not and, in this case, makes the film a snooze-fest as opposed to the mood-piece its creators probably intended! When I first came across this one, I was intrigued by its description as "the greatest Rosalba Neri movie ever"; however, having checked it out for myself now, I regret to report that things could not be further removed from the truth!

Traveling through the countryside, a group of friends stop off at a local castle to take in the sights, which soon prompts them to imagine a time centuries earlier where they're turned into rivals for the same figure that promises to sell her wildest dreams in exchange for her soul.

This was a fairly underwhelming and somewhat problematic Gothic horror outing. Among the big problems here stems from the implications of what's going on while the group stays at the castle. The setup involving the group going around the countryside trying to find a place to relax and coming across the castle where they're invited to stay, while the count, who lives there, starts to close the facility up, starts the film with a rather intriguing setup, but it's far too confusing to make much sense otherwise. The whole idea of the present-day friends being rivals in the flashback scenes makes sense when you know who the characters are beforehand so that when the characterizations switch there's some stakes to things, which doesn't happen here when it takes the girls into different personas almost as soon as we're introduced to them so there's a disconnect to what's going on from when we're initially introduced to them and then no less than five minutes later are told that wasn't important and to follow a different storyline instead. It doesn't help matters that the flashback scenes are just as confusing and difficult to follow. This never makes it clear what's supposed to happen, as it seems to drop the characters into various different scenarios but never commits to anything, with the friends being confirmed as witches, vampires, and ordinary sexual deviants at several points here, depending on the importance of the scene in question. With the storyline follows up on this by throwing a Satanic cult, a mysterious red-hooded figure wandering around the outskirts of the story, and ornate occult rituals for the woman because of what happened on her wedding day, but it's not all that interested in tying these together with any kind of clarity. These things just seem to happen, and it moves on to the next setpiece with everything barely connected or referenced again, making it even harder to make sense of what's going on. The other big factor here is the sense of dullness and boredom from what's presented here. The central idea had plenty of potential to provide some Gothic-tinged goodness with the past revelations making something out of the present-day situation, but rather than doing anything of any substance, all we get are endless scenes involving the duplicitous relationship where she steals the man's boyfriend and manifests the need for capturing the relationship in earnest. None of this keeps the film moving along with any kind of momentum or energy, and it feels like a dull drama for long stretches of the running time, as the only times it really changes things up are when there's some romantic couplings that bring about some fun nudity or the attempts at catching the demonic pact coming together. These scenes offer up some likable factors for the film, but it's not enough to overcome the other drawbacks on display.

Rated Unrated/R: Nudity, Violence, Language, and sex scenes.

You gotta love the 1960s and 1970s European horror flicks. Most of them, anyway. "L'amante del demonio" (alternately called "The Devil's Lover" and "Lucifera Demon Lover" in English) is too slow-moving, and much of it looks like scenes that they added to fill space. There's no shortage of sex, but the movie has so much wasted potential. I prefer it when these movies have lots of blood and guts, and this story of a young woman who goes to sleep in the 20th century and wakes up in an earlier century (where she sees all manner of evil things) just doesn't have enough of that. I recommend sticking with a Jess Franco movie or a Michele Soavi movie if you're looking for some classic Euro-horror.