Sherlock Holmes and his assistant, Dr. Watson, try to solve the murder of the heir to the Baskerville fortune.Sherlock Holmes and his assistant, Dr. Watson, try to solve the murder of the heir to the Baskerville fortune.Sherlock Holmes and his assistant, Dr. Watson, try to solve the murder of the heir to the Baskerville fortune.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Karen Kondazian
- Mrs. Mortimer
- (as Karen Kondan)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
This film is cheap, nasty and very funny. William Shatner at his plank-like best. Why Stuart Grainger ever got involved with this dog, is a mystery of the first order. The sets steal the show, the major laugh coming from the use of old cowboy film sets to represent a Dartmoor village! Too many liberties taken with the original story to mention, but I was not the only one who lost the plot, so did the director.A major insult to Arthur Conan Doyle, but a bloody good chortle for anyone who doesn't take their Holmsian epics too seriously.
This is clearly the most popular Sherlock Holmes adventure, since it is the one most actors choose in order to showcase their suitability for the role (notably Basil Rathbone at Universal and Peter Cushing for Hammer) and was even plundered for spoofing purposes in 1978! With this in mind, it is small wonder that Stewart Granger, too, has turned up in an adaptation; the end result, however, was very much disliked by Leonard Maltin – rating it 'Below Average' and accorded the unenviable epithet "for masochists only"! Still, all things considered, its main fault is that of being thoroughly superfluous – with no new take on the narrative (apart from presenting us with the first white-haired Holmes!) and, worse, ripping off Dr. Watson's buffoonish characterization straight from Nigel Bruce! If anything, the film-makers have managed to recruit a serviceable cast (including a fine Anthony Zerbe as a limping and henpecked{!} doctor, a wasted Jane Merrow and Sally Ann Howes, a grumpy John Williams, and a surprisingly restrained William Shatner in a dual role), while the titular beast looks vicious enough (unlike some of the better versions, admittedly!) – what is more, this is certainly proof that, in some cases, the plot really is the thing (as the saying goes)...
This is the umpteenth version of a popular Conan Doyle mystery novel, featuring the legendary Sherlock Holmes and his assistant Watson. Unfortunately, this is the poorest version of the story of the lot, with terribly miscast actors struggling to contend with an amateurish script. Shatner and Zerbe in particular look misplaced amid the period trappings, but even Granger (as Holmes) doesn't seem to fit, in spite of his classical English accent.Even the music for the movie is plundered from Cape Fear. If you want to see a good Sherlock Holmes movie, stick with the Basil Rathbone series.... this is the pits!
And that is understated! The film does take a lot of liberty with the original story. But not only that. Stewart Granger who might not be a bad actor after all is certainly not a Shelock Holmes. And who in those days would have appointed a person as looking like Mortimer as Medical officer of any district in those days. I mean - why create a mysterious character where there is no need of one. One thing however is remarkable in this case. According to the book Mortimer is "a fellow under thirty". Anthony Zerbe was 36 when this film was made. Still older than the original Mortimer yet younger than Lionel Atwill in the film from '39 who was then 54 or Francis de Wolff who was 46 in 59 when Terence Fisher chose to make his film or Denholm Elliot in the '83 version who was then already 61. The Set has been commented on in several critics and there is nothing much to add to this. The costumes are all right, I guess (even if it seems that the whole male population of London was wearing Inverness Capes) but why did Holmes have to wear that ridiculous Bow-Tie in the beginning. One thing however should be mentioned: Bernard Fox. I have not seen any other performances of his but I did like him as Watson. He is not quite the bumbler as in many other Holmes films but has in fact some rather bright moments in this one. Anyway he is not unlike the Paget Watson.
One of my sci-fi/horror/fantasy reviews written 50 years ago: Directed by Barry Crane; Produced by Stanley Kallis, Executive Producer: Richard Irving, for Universal TV, broadcast by ABC-TV. Screenplay by Robert E. Thompson; Photography by Harry Wolf; Edited by Bill Mosher; Special Photographic Effects by Albert Whitlock. Starring: Stewart Granger, Bernard Fox, Anthony Zerbe, William Shatner, Sally Ann Howes, Jane Merrow, Ian Ireland and John Williams.
Embarrassing TV movie condensed to fit the 90-minute time slot by the latterday "Mission: Impossible" production team is poor in every respect: offensively stupid musical score, stinko obvious backlot sets, phony British accents and poor acting, plus Fox's sickening Nigel Bruce imitation. This movie epitomizes the condescending, insincere attitude toward filmmaking, remakes and the popular horror genre.
Embarrassing TV movie condensed to fit the 90-minute time slot by the latterday "Mission: Impossible" production team is poor in every respect: offensively stupid musical score, stinko obvious backlot sets, phony British accents and poor acting, plus Fox's sickening Nigel Bruce imitation. This movie epitomizes the condescending, insincere attitude toward filmmaking, remakes and the popular horror genre.
Did you know
- TriviaThis film was intended as a part of a revolving series of detectives, including Nick Carter starring Robert Conrad but poor ratings stopped that.
- ConnectionsEdited from The Railway Children (1970)
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Der Hund von Baskerville
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 14m(74 min)
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.33 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content