A group of skiers are trapped inside a runaway train hurtling down a mountainside.A group of skiers are trapped inside a runaway train hurtling down a mountainside.A group of skiers are trapped inside a runaway train hurtling down a mountainside.
Lee Montgomery
- Mark Shedd
- (as Lee H. Montgomery)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I fully enjoyed this movie. Having once worked for a railroad I am aware of some technical inaccuracies, but it's worth overlooking to enjoy the premise. I especially love Ben Johnson as the engineer. I used to love the railroad the way his character does and totally relate to him. Some people have said there are no stars in it besides him, but Vera Miles was nice to see. Martin Milner's character is a little annoying to me though. I liked seeing the young boy from "Ben" too. I love those old diesel locomotives too! I have a grainy copy I recorded from TV. I wish they would release this on DVD. And yes, it is short and sweet.
Channel 5 decided to give this a showing yesterday - I remembered enjoying it as a B Movie in my youth and decided to record it. Ummmmm. Could I really have enjoyed something so corny and predictable. Ben Murphy plays Kid Curry but without the Cowboy Hat. Ben Johnson drives the train and shows absolutely no cause for concern that his train, carry 200+ passengers, is about to leave the rails at Jackson City and cause massive carnage. A completely unrealistic movie albeit with some good scenery. As satisfying as an episode of Love Boat.
I saw this movie when it first aired, 33 years ago. Eek! But still it sticks in my mind. I hated the GRAND HOTEL or, if you prefer, TOWERING INFERNO trope of having various folks in various personal crises (the disaffected long-married couple & al.; now that I think of it, GRAND HOTEL may be the only movie of this type I think ever worked, SHIP OF FOOLS included), but the runaway-train problem itself, and how it's solved, still sticks in my mind.
I know it's probably no better than a time-wasting movie, but the ending is a glorious, happy surprise. And Ben Johnson does his patented underacting to bring a smooth, calm centre to what would otherwise be a hysterical disaster movie.
I was pleased to note (thanks, IMDb!) that the screenwriter for this non-epic also wrote one of my favourite recent movies, THE FORGOTTEN.
I know it's probably no better than a time-wasting movie, but the ending is a glorious, happy surprise. And Ben Johnson does his patented underacting to bring a smooth, calm centre to what would otherwise be a hysterical disaster movie.
I was pleased to note (thanks, IMDb!) that the screenwriter for this non-epic also wrote one of my favourite recent movies, THE FORGOTTEN.
I'm an avid railroad fan, and for all of its inadequacies, I feel that this movie still rates as excellent. I first saw this as a child, and have been searching for it for over fifteen years. I was lucky enough to find someone on Ebay that has a 35mm copy of it and does sell videos of it, so for all the true fans of this movie, check out Ebay.
As for the technical end of it, the plot is probably something that could not happen, at least in the magnitude depicted here. ALL diesel locomotives have something called a TRACTION BRAKE, which, like the reversal of an airliners engines to slow an aircraft, does essentially the same thing. The traction brake reverses electrical polarity to the motors, causing them to act AGAINST forward motion. This is comparable to downshifting an automobile transmission into first or low gear when descending steep hills. By itself, the traction brake could not have stopped the train, but the locomotive could have slowed the train down to a less than fatal speed. Also, a helper locomotive added to the rear of a train would probably not have the power to stop a train travelling 70+ mph by itself. It would need the assistance of the air brake throughout the train to accomplish that - which was useless in the movie plot, and even if it weren't, there's no way the air hoses could be connected on a moving train.
Despite these flaws, the movie is very entertaining, and at 70 minutes, it is like a sweet and satisfying snack, compared to a 120 minute main course.
As for the technical end of it, the plot is probably something that could not happen, at least in the magnitude depicted here. ALL diesel locomotives have something called a TRACTION BRAKE, which, like the reversal of an airliners engines to slow an aircraft, does essentially the same thing. The traction brake reverses electrical polarity to the motors, causing them to act AGAINST forward motion. This is comparable to downshifting an automobile transmission into first or low gear when descending steep hills. By itself, the traction brake could not have stopped the train, but the locomotive could have slowed the train down to a less than fatal speed. Also, a helper locomotive added to the rear of a train would probably not have the power to stop a train travelling 70+ mph by itself. It would need the assistance of the air brake throughout the train to accomplish that - which was useless in the movie plot, and even if it weren't, there's no way the air hoses could be connected on a moving train.
Despite these flaws, the movie is very entertaining, and at 70 minutes, it is like a sweet and satisfying snack, compared to a 120 minute main course.
When on skiing holiday with the family, what better to watch as evening-entertainment than a disaster movie about a runaway train ... in a ski-resort!
"Runaway!" is one of the more obscure ABC Movies of the Week, I reckon. I never even heard of it when I accidentally stumbled upon it on YouTube (the picture quality is poor but certainly watchable). Nevertheless, it's a very entertaining and exciting thrill-ride that has quite a lot in common with the 2010 blockbuster "Unstoppable". So much even that I wonder if the late Tony Scott perhaps found some inspiration here, like the head-machinist's forced retirement or the attempt of stopping the train by connecting another one at the rear end.
For the rest, it's a typical 70s TV-movie, with typical 70s TV-movie characters. The only difference is that they are rushing down a snowy mountain at 60mph on a train of which the brakes have given up due to the ice and cold. Will the life-threatening ordeal save the marriage of a bickering couple? Shall the young student overcome the forbidden love for her professor? Will the careless and selfish rebel develop some humanity and help the other passengers? Etc. It's incredibly clichéd, but I loved it. And besides, remember the unwritten rule of disaster movies: when there's an exclamation mark in the title (!), the situation is very, very serious!
"Runaway!" is one of the more obscure ABC Movies of the Week, I reckon. I never even heard of it when I accidentally stumbled upon it on YouTube (the picture quality is poor but certainly watchable). Nevertheless, it's a very entertaining and exciting thrill-ride that has quite a lot in common with the 2010 blockbuster "Unstoppable". So much even that I wonder if the late Tony Scott perhaps found some inspiration here, like the head-machinist's forced retirement or the attempt of stopping the train by connecting another one at the rear end.
For the rest, it's a typical 70s TV-movie, with typical 70s TV-movie characters. The only difference is that they are rushing down a snowy mountain at 60mph on a train of which the brakes have given up due to the ice and cold. Will the life-threatening ordeal save the marriage of a bickering couple? Shall the young student overcome the forbidden love for her professor? Will the careless and selfish rebel develop some humanity and help the other passengers? Etc. It's incredibly clichéd, but I loved it. And besides, remember the unwritten rule of disaster movies: when there's an exclamation mark in the title (!), the situation is very, very serious!
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 13m(73 min)
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.33 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content