Rulers of the City

Italian gangster film from cult director Fernando Di Leo

This film, which is well worth seeing and is also known as "I padroni della citta" or "Mister Scarface", was released in Italian cinemas on December 3rd, 1976 and in West German cinemas on December 9th, 1977. "ZWEI SUPERTYPEN RÄUMEN AUF / Two Super Guys Clean Up" is the last film from the very innovative production company Daunia 80, which, with director Fernando Di Leo, produced such classics of the Italian gangster film (poliziotteschi) as "Milano Caliber 9" (1972), "La mala ordina / The Mafia Boss - They Kill Like Jackals " (1972) - by the way, both with a magnificent and uninhibited EUROPEAN FILM AWARD nominee Mario Adorf - and of course "Il Boss / Der Teufel führt Regie" (1973) brought to the cinema.

This film is about Tony (Harry Baer), a young mafia money collector who, although he can casually cruise around Rome in his buggy, is not satisfied with his position in the mafia hierarchy. The likeable and actually rather slight rascal is such a sophisticated pugilist that he can beat any opponent to the ground, which can also be seen in detail. One day the opportunity arises to get one over on one of the big names in the underworld (delightfully nasty: the future Oscar winner Jack Palance as Manzari or Mister Scarface). Tony promptly gets caught up in the conflict between various gangs, which he tries to outsmart together with the experienced underworld agent Vincenzo Napoli (Vittorio Caprioli). They get support from another cool kid named Ric (Al Cliver), who isn't particularly into beatings, but can shoot remarkably well and still has a mysterious score to settle from the past. The beautiful Clara plays a smaller role (played by the enchanting Gisela Hahn, who also gets to sing a song herself here - probably T'amo lo stesso), who is good friends with both guys. What's worth noting is that Tony and Ric could also pass as a couple. Slight homoerotic undertones can definitely be heard. Edmund Purdom and Peter Berling, who also co-wrote the script, can also be seen in other roles.

This film is really fun! Great atmosphere, lots of action, hearty fights and a sophisticated villain! Not quite as strong as Di Leo's three masterpieces mentioned above, but definitely worth seeing!

An astonishing discovery is the German actor Harry Baer in one of the main roles, who fights his way through the underworld in a cool and charming way that you can't help but be amazed by. Born in 1947, Baer worked a lot at the beginning of his career with successful director Rainer Werner Fassbinder (e.g. "Götter der Pest" (1970) and many others), but is still present and has also appeared in "Feuchtgebiete" (2012 ) played along.

The beautiful Gisela Hahn (born 1943) is known for her appearances alongside Brad Harris (KOMMISSAR X / SIE NANNTEN IHN ZAMBO).

Peter Berling (1934-2017) could also be seen alongside the powerful Giancarlo Prete in the beating suit "Alle für einen - Prügel für alle" (1973), for which he also wrote the screenplay, and in the classics "The Marriage of Maria Braun" (1979), "The Name of the Rose" (1986) and "Homo Faber" (1991).

I have to admit that I collected this one because it had Fernando di Leo writing and directing, but got around to watching it because I just couldn't fathom the way the reviews are love it/hate it. I still don't get that. My best WAG is that the Italian and American releases are *very* different. I watched the original Italian release with English subtitles.

There are better ones in the genre, but only a bit so. It never failed in any important way, imho. Elements were really, really great. The location shots were divine. Sitting there with some venison bolognese and a glass of red wine, you could just *wallow* in some of the location scenery. For those with marginal Italian, it was one of the easiest to understand I've ever watched. Barely needed the subtitles. That's a good comment on it, compared with other Italian crime flicks. It's very straight ahead. Not so predictable as to be boring, but what you see is what you get and that's quite satisfying.

I thought the humor was well done, never over the top or distracting. And, unlike a lot of token crime film humor...it was funny. Every now and then you say, "Wait...how?...oh", but rather than being a continuity problem I thought that gave it a real-life kind of feel. Bits that would have been dragged out forever in most any movie, boom!, just happen, again giving it a real life effect. Other bits are drawn out. Well balanced, on balance, I thought.

So, I just don't understand the negative reviews on this one. It has to be that the American release is very different and really crap. Most the negative reviews I've seen have been in connection with the "Fernando di Leo Crime Collection" DVD. I collected all the ones on that release from the original Italian ones, so I don't know anything about it, but I'm thinking it could be a poor release of this movie. I'll stand by my opinion that there is nothing in the world wrong or not to like about the Italian release of this one. Light hearted at times, it's not lightweight by any stretch.

I had first watched this on the big screen as part of the Italian B-movie retrospective held during the 2004 Venice Film Festival (where 6 features by Di Leo were shown); back then, I didn't like it - rating it ** and feeling that it was rather unbalanced by the vulgar comedy relief (though typical of Italian films during this era), especially when compared to the director's other relatively more sober stuff (which had proved my first encounter with his work)!

Watching it again as part of a mini-tribute to its star, Jack Palance (who passed away recently), I found myself a lot more receptive to it; Di Leo dabbled most often in the crime genre and, as can be deduced from the title, this one falls into that category: the plot, dealing with a gang war (one faction controlled by Palance and the other by Edmund Purdom), is no great shakes but, at its centre is a revenge plan involving Palance and young misfit Al Cliver (whose identity is unknown to the 'boss'); this element gives it an undeniable edge, and the exciting climax takes place at a massive abandoned slaughterhouse - where an old betrayal and murder had taken place.

As is typical of the director, the action is pretty constant and always dynamic - aided by a fine eclectic score by Luis Enrique Bacalov; there's a discreet amount of nudity and, as I said, a slight overdose of comedy: however, as I watched more films by Di Leo (totaling nine so far), I realized that this was basically an idiosyncrasy of his (evident even in a straight melodrama such as LA SEDUZIONE [1973]) but, in any case, I generally appreciated its style of humor now - especially when delivered by Di Leo regular Vittorio Caprioli (my favorite bit occurs towards the end, when he shoots the bad guys at close range with a bunch of guns he purchased for an eventual showdown but, constantly missing the mark, reasons to himself that the weapons must be defective and, therefore, he ought to return them and file a complaint to boot!).

Palance is suitably sinister and imposing - even if he probably spends more time being had, so to speak, than dishing it out! In the end, what's missing from the film vis-a'-vis Di Leo's other genre work is a strong hero (i.e. a credible opponent to Palance) in the vein of Gastone Moschin (from THE CONTRACT [1972]), Mario Adorf (from THE Italian CONNECTION [1972]) and Henry Silva (from WIPEOUT! [1973])...

Energised to some degree by some inspired acting, this violent little crime caper has a young, carefree protection collector (Baer) swindling a big-time hood (Palance) out of 10 million Lira only to discover that his "good deed" has deadly consequences for all concerned. His alliance with a former gang member of the hood (Cliver) may be the only chance he has to clear his debts, and survive, but there's another motivation for Cliver's expert assistance.

Palance is wasted talking out the corner of his mouth while he incessantly chews on a durry filter, while poor old Edmund Purdom really has things tough in this film. His character is publicly emasculated and betrayed by his own favoured son. The role isn't especially prominent, nor key to the plot, so Purdom's appearance in it is both unusual (for such a distinguished actor) and ultimately frivolous. Baer is likable as the charismatic "enforcer", who attracts as much attention from the ladies as he does from those attempting to kill him. Rotund funny-man Caprioli as the wily old Purdom gang member over-indulges in the humour, becoming a parody. Overall, it's very hit and miss.

There's not much to recommend; lots of fisticuffs, gun-fights, car-chases and the like, but the tongue-in-cheek element is never consistently applied, and consequently, the tone is confusing, the film itself a dull experience.

Rulers of the City does have a lot going for it. It does fall short of being great, and Fernando Di Leo and Jack Palance have done better in their respective careers, but this is not even close to being career-worsts for either and is a very respectable film overall.

The locations are splendid, and the gritty roughness of the photography and clever (without being too much or too dizzying) camera angles capture it more than ideally. There is also a dynamite score, exhilarating action scenes (the final shootout being the prime example) and mostly above-decent direction, if in need of more tension in places. The script is tight and more light-hearted than Di Leo's Milieu trilogy, but it was light-heartedness and witty humour that didn't feel too misplaced, and the story is at least engrossing and swiftly paced on the most part.

Casting-wise, Rulers of the City is very much a mixed bag, with the best performances being from a sinister Jack Palance (though he was deserving of more screen time) and a lively and lots-of-fun, without being too clownish, Vittorio Napoli as the film's most colourful character. Harry Baer has some charming moments too and Giselda Hahn brings a little heart. Al Clivar however does show his limitations as an actor in a somewhat one-note performance and Edmund Perdum is rather stiff in an underwritten role.

Aside from a slow-motion dream-like opening sequence, that was quite striking if perhaps not necessary, Rulers of the City does take too long to get going and the story only really comes to life once Palance appears. The film was in need of more tension and suspense, and stronger writing for the villains (who were underutilised and never really developed, and this is including Palance's character) would have helped. The final shoot-out is great, but ends a little anti-climactically. And I do have to agree about the homo-erotic undertones and homosexuality hints being clumsily written and out of place, which did feel the film a bizarre feel at times.

Overall, respectable but could have been better. 6/10 Bethany Cox