The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson: The Hound of the Baskervilles

If you have slightest possibility to get it and if you enjoy reading Conan Doyle, you have to get it! It's the best film about Holmes I've ever seen! Its director made no one step from the original plot and kept everything safe. You will appreciate warm irony and humor of this film. It's a masterpiece.

This version of Hounds is sensational. I recommend viewing with a good audio system as the background music can really pop. The same for the whole series.

This episode has remarkably strong characters - the writers were not reluctant to shift attention from Holmes and Watson. These characters are a reason to watch Hounds over and over. For example, Evgeniy Steblov as Dr. Mortimer is highly engaging. He is entertaining while reading the Hounds curse, kind of a reverse HItchcock where the McGuffin is the curse, about which no one really cares about the details.

Nikita Mikhalkov as Sir Henry is equally engaging. His introduction into the story is unconventional, and might seem out of place at first. The Sherlock-Cumberbatch series might have benefited from more development of Russell Tovey's Henry. The Barrymore's are also fleshed out.

The production company is Lenfilm which, I am told, refers to a Leningrad organization. I assume the exteriors are from that part of Europe. I love the lighting (not the low contrast flat kind we often see). The camera work is on a par with the BBC of the same era - excellent in movement and angles. The execution of the Foley artist's contributions is not always great but, to my mind, adds character.

I purchased the series DVD with English subtitles. The video looks good on a 60-inch screen. I'm not in the industry, I had a screen test at 20th Century Fox in 1948. I didn't pass the test.

Russian TV version of the story that was filmed as part of a series and then released elsewhere as a stand alone film. For the most part an excellent adaption of the story with a real genuine chemistry and warmth between Homes and Watson that would seem to predate the Jermey Brett series. This feels the way the stories should feel. If there are any flaws in the film it would be that Henry Baskerville is not English raised in North America rather he's decidedly Russian in manner, The moors, while very ominous-possibly the most in any adaptation-are not quite England and the last "flaw" is that the film is overly faithful to the story and runs two and a half hours.They are minor flaws and should not keep you from watching one of the better Holmes films made.

The movie, as well as others of this series, proves that if you got a talent, you can shoot even if you are somewhat short on means. To shoot this movie, the crew, of course, could not go to some British location, and its London portion was shot in the ancient quarter of Riga. But more than anything, marvelous play of V. Livanov and Co. made it possible to express the spirit of this novel by Arthur Conan Doyle as well as the atmosphere of the 19th century England (which, on the whole, was not the case when the Soviet movie-makers had to deal with American settings.) Unforgettable irony of almost omniscient Sherlock Holmes, Watson's ignorance, bordering on stupidity, charming sagacity of Mrs. Hudson, thick-witted inspector Lestrade - that's how the movie about Sherlock Holmes should look like.

Once, a poll was conducted in England, and Vassily Livanov and Vitaliy Solomin were found the best ever impersonation of Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson in the movies all over the world. Here, the brilliant couple delivers again. In addition, the winning plot and the magnificent guest performances of Nikita Michalkov as Sir Henry and of Oleg Yankovsky as Stapleton make this movie exceptional even amongst the Russian Sherlock Holmes series. A must!