The Deadly Spawn

This movie has a bigger cult following than many might think, and I am proud to say I am part of it. I see this film in the ballpark of "The Evil Dead", "Re-Animator", "Bad Taste", and many other classics of splatter legend. I don't feel the need to criticize the acting (unless you count the first two hapless victims), and this is because this movie does what most movies don't with their characters: it makes them REAL people. The fantastic elements blend beautifully with the boring, frustrating mess of most people's everyday life. Still, this is a fun b-movie, which means instead of depressing us with the real-life stuff, it puts some humorous spins on it. The gore and creature FX are amazing. Don't let that R rating fool you, this is one HARD R, so those with weak stomachs need not apply. The creature FX I was amazed by most of all. I would love to know how they did this with such a low budget! Everything in this looks extremely vivid and real (with the exception of some amateurish backgrounds at the beginning and end that are obviously pictures somebody painted or whatever). Even the computer cartoons of "Jurassic Park" do not hold a candle to these creature FX in the least. This is definitely one of the greatest indie/sci-fi/horror/splatter films ever, and I do wonder why it hasn't got the kind of recognition that movies like "Evil Dead" have (no big-budget sequels maybe?). As for those who call "Parasite" a sequel to this, I don't get it. Not only is this a film far more superior to "Parasite" and was seemingly made by totally different people, there is absolutely no way to connect them unless you're talking genre-wise. "Parasite" is in the far-off future, this one's in the present. "Parasite" is about genetically engineered creatures, this one's about space aliens. This one has a sense of humor. "Parasite" doesn't. In any case, I love "Return of the Aliens: The Deadly Spawn" (no matter what title it's under) for it is the classic that "Parasite" should have been and much, much more.

I'll keep it short and sweet. If you like your horror with a big fat daddy budget, this ain't for you. there's no CGI, There's no a-grade actors, there's no intense orchestral score by Danny Elfman. So, now, for the rest of you that are left - this movie is great. It has the same elements that made Peter Jacksons "Braindead" and "Bad Taste" so good, heart. the people who made this film obviously loved what they where doing and managed to pull off some great special effects and gore whilst doing so. i wish this film had another equally low-budget follow-up because the creatures are really great and after watching it you can almost smell all those 80's creature features looming round the corner. I would be very shocked if the people who made critters hadn't watched this first. So i recommend this anyone who likes mad little flesh eating beasties and lots and lots (and i do mean lots) of gore.

Extremely low budget, but lively sci-fi horror movie about a group of people trapped in a house full of toothy extraterrestrial monsters, hatched from a fallen meteorite, which look like a cross between a giant salamander and H.R. Giger's creation from the ALIEN movies.

The shoestring budget actually adds to the movie's charm, as it appears to have been written, shot and designed by a bunch of talented kids who had nothing better to do with the weekend (which is actually not far from the truth).

The dialog and performances, in general, are fair at best, but the swift pace, campy atmosphere and enthusiastic carnage balance out the shortcomings. Great music score, too. At any rate, you get the feeling that the filmmakers have a true love of the horror genre. It's creepy, gory, and a lot of fun, and would be a perfect flick for a Halloween horror-thon.

This low-budget indie flick shows its roots with production values that seem about 10 years or so out of date, including a muddled sound design and fuzzy image quality. Despite bursting out of the gate at the start, the plot often struggles with pacing; the direction often comes off as weak and lethargic. In fairness, this seems to be the first of only two credits in any regard for filmmaker Douglas McKeown - and for that matter, most everyone in the cast or crew have few if any other credits to their name. It shouldn't be too surprising, then, that the dialogue tends to be gauche; that acting is at many times stilted, unnatural, and less than completely believable; that the picture has problems with internal consistency (a character is covered in blood in one moment, and in the next, they're barely touched). Funnily enough, it's effects supervisor John Dods who seems to have the most experience of anyone involved, and it should be said that the contributions of Dods and his collaborators are without question the most outwardly successful aspect of 'The deadly spawn.' The creatures and all the blood and gore are unmistakably fake, yes, but at that, all the nastiness looks fantastic (in accordance with suspension of disbelief), and should scratch the itch of any fan of monster movies.

Of course the film pales in comparison to most any other horror sci-fi flick one could name, that rather goes without saying. Yet if one recognizes the nature of the production - the lack of major financial backing, the inexperience of those involved, the earnest desire nonetheless to craft a violent romp of a genre flick - then this isn't half bad, and it even becomes kind of fascinating. There's no denying that it still has problems, but a great deal of sincerity and hard work went into making this, and for all the indelicacies and inelegance, the result is much better than not. Why, it's definitely far better than many genre flicks, even major studio projects, that have followed in the years since. Again, Dods' effects absolutely stand out, not least at the climax. Apart from the dialogue, McKeown's screenplay is reasonably solid; the scene writing and narrative are straightforward, but completely, compelling, and fun. (Ah, that ending!) While a little heavy-handed and club-footed, McKeown's direction is decent enough, and the cast put in fine effort. It's clear everyone on hand just wanted to have a good time, and they quite succeed in passing that on to the audience; what more could one want?

Even with faltering audio, the sound effects are executed well; the original score teeters on the fine line between "enjoyable and lending atmosphere" and "blunt and over the top," but like so many other aspects here comes across as more capable than not. At no point could one make any mistake about what they're watching; at its worst and at its best, it shines through what level 'The deadly spawn' is operating on. Faults and all, however, this is ultimately entertaining, and its deficiencies just become part of the tapestry. I'd hardly say this is essential, but if you have the chance to watch it, 'The deadly spawn' is a good way to pass 80 minutes. Recommendable particularly for fans of creature features.

"The Deadly Spawn" is a classic example of a horror flick made on a shoestring budget which is nevertheless worth watching due to the ingenuity of its creators.

The plot is basically non-existent. An alien comes to Earth in a meteor and hides in a family's basement. It starts picking people off and having little babies that look and behave like land-based piranhas.

The characters and dialogue are all completely forgettable. The enthusiasm that went into the creature and gore effects obviously didn't rub off on the cast.

But that's not what you watch it for. You watch it to see what a talented crew can do with little money and on that score, "The Deadly Spawn" more than delivers.