Wall Street

Deceptively deep and complex picture from co-writer/director Oliver Stone paints a vivid portrait of 1980s over-excesses as the age of "Me, Me, Me" (otherwise known as the 1980s) is explored through the eyes of a young, eager and impatient stockbroker (Charlie Sheen) who moonlights as a liaison to a heartless, ruthless and crazily greedy mega-millionaire (Michael Douglas in a smashing Oscar-winning turn) who seemingly has his hands on most every aspect of big business. Naturally dilemmas occur in every direction for Sheen as the lifestyle he wants comes at a very heavy price (both literally and figuratively). A strained relationship with his father (real-life dad Martin Sheen) and a whirlwind fling with the superficial Daryl Hannah just leads to more and more cinematic fireworks. "Wall Street" is really the only film I can think of to deal seriously with its subject matter. Everyone of the age remembers the yuppie phase this nation had in the mid-1980s. Young urban professionals did their best to make as much as they could as fast as possible (sometimes through crooked and illegal means). The idea of retiring at 40 seemed like a good notion, but those same people with those thoughts are still working today (they never made their millions or they made their money and ended up going into a lifetime of debt because they spent their earnings quicker than they could make it). Ultimately the 1980s was good while it lasted, but good like that never lasts forever and that becomes painfully clear as Sheen's character becomes a warning to all those who think they can out-think and manipulate a strained economic system. Douglas is a complete revelation. I mean there is no doubt that he is an excellent performer, but his portrayal of a money- and power-mad player in New York is truly one of those instances of classic career work being achieved. Super-slick, wickedly intelligent and definitely a thinking person's movie, "Wall Street" continues to strike a chord when looking back at a very unique time of American economic history. 4.5 out of 5 stars.

I can sometimes find Oliver Stone an overrated director but WALL STREET is the best I've seen of his yet. A quite wonderful exploration of a topic that's undoubtedly mystifying to most people, WALL STREET explores the world of the stockbroker in an interesting and engaging way. That along the way it showcases '80s greed and excuse and highlights a career-best performance from Michael Douglas as the reptilian Gordon Gecko is merely incidental.

That Stone also elicits some compelling turns from a commendably straight Charlie Sheen, RETURN OF THE LIVING DEAD'S James Karen as a delightfully weaselly boss and Terence Stamp just adds to the fun. A decent story, well told and acted by a cast of professionals.

Wall Street (1987)

*** 1/2 (out of 4)

A second hand broker (Charlie Sheen) dreams of becoming the next Gordon Gekko (Michael Douglas), a major player on Wall Street, and eventually gets his shot to impress the big wig. Soon the kid learns that Wall Street is full of lies, cheating and greed and Gekko is willing to take him under his wing but soon he realizes that at some point enough is enough. It's been a while since I watched this film but I was really shocked to see how well it holds up today even though I'm sure many people would attack director Stone for making the Wall Street guys too much of a villain and perhaps adding too much of his conspiracy theories to trading. I don't think there's any doubt that Stone is using this film as a "warning" to those who give their last dollars to these major companies only to have bloodsuckers like Gekko come down and become richer while the poor become poorer. Some would argue this is overdamatics on the part of Stone but I'm sure there would be many who would say he was shining the light on evil greed. Either way this film holds up remarkably well thanks in large part to the terrific performances but also because the characters are so wonderfully written that even if you know nothing about trading it's likely you're going to know both Gekko and the kid. I think what's so remarkable about the film is that it really does play out like a Hitchcock thriller because you just know the kid is eventually going to get in over his head and while watching the thing you can't help but feel you're walking on eggshells as he becomes richer and richer yet he's too stupid to see the price he's going to end up paying. Tom Cruise appears to have become a respectable actor out of this period but I think Sheen gets overlooked as he certainly had a strong resume at this point of his career. He certainly brings that hot shot attitude to the role but he also has a vulnerability that works extremely well especially towards the end when he starts to see what he has done. Douglas, in an Oscar-winning performance, is downright masterful as the snake Gekko and you can't help but on one hand hate this guy but at the same time you can't help but want to be him with the power and attitude. Martin Sheen often gets overlooked in the film but a lot of the connection one has with the movie comes from him. John C. McGinley, Hal Holbrook, James Karen, Terence Stamp, Sean Young, James Spader, Saul Rubinek and Daryl Hannah add to their characters and deliver the goods as well. I think Stone's direction is a major point to the film's success as he perfectly handles the bigger picture of the greed of Wall Street but also the smaller relationships in the film. Again, the film works perfectly as a thriller but there's also a lot of heart and soul in the film thanks to the relationship between the father and son.

I totally adoire this movie, fabulous gritty no holds barred performance from the brilliant Mr Douglas, proving that sex is by no means the overwhelming theme of his movies as some seem to imagine.

I love the anxious, terrifyingly rapid advance given to the young Bud Fox from a chance comment in Gekkos daunting office, the instant changes of mood by Micheal swinging from interviewing to lambasting an industry peer on the phone and back to interviewing without a flicker.

Inspirational in the 'no fear' modus operandi of Gordon and then Bud, almost 'you can do anything if you dare' which has always given me a lift when I watch it.

Lush settings, and marvellous counterpointing performance of Terence Stamp, illustrating the 'Gekko' figure scenario in turn to Gordon nas Gordon had to Bud...

Await all Michaels movies with bated breath...Falling down....wonderful...but thats another story

Wall Street" is a movie that seems to spark much debate. Basically, it is the working out of a moral struggle within young Wall Street trader Bud Fox (Charlie Sheen) between the values with which he was raised of hard work and success through actual creation, versus those of his mentor Gordon Gekko (Michael Douglas) who succeeds through corporate raiding and "creative destruction". From Bud's viewpoint his dad's (Martin Sheen's) road map for success and happiness seems old-fashioned to the point of being prehistoric compared to Gekko's, until Gekko sets his sights and his wrecking ball on his father's company, and Bud is forced to choose.

Many people associate this film with a liberal versus conservative viewpoint on business, a wild-west economy versus a planned economy and relegate this film to 1980's era nostalgia, like the now humorously giant cell phone Gekko is talking on as he walks along the beach. It is said that neither extreme works and that we've gradually settled towards something in the middle. However, the Gekkos of this world are smarter than that, and over the past 20 plus years they have set up an economic system that serves them well. What we now have is a situation where the haves and have-mores have a planned - almost Soviet - system in which the rules stratify them at the top. I cite the changes in bankruptcy law as exhibit A. The members of the labor force that serve them, however, are in the wild-west economy that was once advocated for everyone. Some will rise to the stratified top in this situation, but the vast majority will remain at the bottom shooting it out with each other - for scarce good jobs, good health care, education, etc. Thus, to me, Wall Street is just an opening chapter in the saga of how economic forces and attitudes toward them have changed, not the portrait of a 25 year-old fad that has come and gone.