The love story between American divorcee Wallis Simpson and Edward VIII, that ended in his abdication for the woman he loved.The love story between American divorcee Wallis Simpson and Edward VIII, that ended in his abdication for the woman he loved.The love story between American divorcee Wallis Simpson and Edward VIII, that ended in his abdication for the woman he loved.
- Nominated for 2 Primetime Emmys
- 3 nominations total
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
How true "The Woman He Loved" is debatable. So why do I say the truth is debatable? Well, in recent years, several documentaries have claimed that King Edward VIII did NOT abdicate in order to marry an American divorcee as was publicly announced but because he was so pro-Germany that he could not be trusted to look after the best interests of Britain as WWII approached. This more recent interpretation seems reasonable, as Edward really did admire the Third Reich...to the point of making some very bad decisions. And, many in government did distrust him...so they sent him off to the Caribbean (where he was made governor of the Bahamas) to get him out of the way instead of allowing him to remain in his own country during the war. This film clearly is meant to promote the commonly repeated theme that he was incredibly in love with Wallace and he sacrificed everything for this love.
So why would I watch this film even though I am inclined to believe the new image of the couple? Well, Olivia de Havilland is in the film...and it's her last film appearance. That is what I really wanted to see. Sadly, she was barely in the film at all.
The story begins with the death of Edward in the early 1970s and then bounces back and forth from that time to 1936-7 when she and Edward were a couple. It really doesn't focus much on their life post-marriage.
For me, this was a tough film to love. I have always thought the couple were selfish and foolish....so I really didn't buy into the who romance angle. It also didn't help that Anthony Andrews was stiff and Jane Seymour, in a few scenes, looked positively grotesque with the odd facial appliances they added to her face. Overall, a film that bored me a bit and whitewashed Edward's love of the Reich...and it's really not even part of the story, which it surely should have been.
Seymour--weird facial prostethics. Ghoulish.
Begins with his death.
So why would I watch this film even though I am inclined to believe the new image of the couple? Well, Olivia de Havilland is in the film...and it's her last film appearance. That is what I really wanted to see. Sadly, she was barely in the film at all.
The story begins with the death of Edward in the early 1970s and then bounces back and forth from that time to 1936-7 when she and Edward were a couple. It really doesn't focus much on their life post-marriage.
For me, this was a tough film to love. I have always thought the couple were selfish and foolish....so I really didn't buy into the who romance angle. It also didn't help that Anthony Andrews was stiff and Jane Seymour, in a few scenes, looked positively grotesque with the odd facial appliances they added to her face. Overall, a film that bored me a bit and whitewashed Edward's love of the Reich...and it's really not even part of the story, which it surely should have been.
Seymour--weird facial prostethics. Ghoulish.
Begins with his death.
The story about Edward and Wallis continues to fascinate - especially as it really happened. I have heard the version, that Edward in reality was too weak for the role of king, and needed an excuse to abdicate. And that Wallis got to be this excuse - which made his abdication into a romantic sacrifice instead of a failure. I suppose we will never know the true cause - and maybe it was a little bit of both. People are complicated!
I liked this rendering of the story. It gave a fine and believable picture of the time period. Jane Seymore was just perfect as Wallis, and Anthony Andrews, with his upper-class accent and manners as always, was just as perfect as Edward! He looked very sad, weary, stiff and quite haggard all the time though - but maybe this was deliberate..? I think, however, that more could have been made of this movie, with its very good cast and interesting subject matter. First of all it ought to have been longer - at least as long as an ordinary feature film. And then I would have wanted to see more of the couple's love and courtship and happy times...
But all in all it was a nice movie, well worth watching!
I liked this rendering of the story. It gave a fine and believable picture of the time period. Jane Seymore was just perfect as Wallis, and Anthony Andrews, with his upper-class accent and manners as always, was just as perfect as Edward! He looked very sad, weary, stiff and quite haggard all the time though - but maybe this was deliberate..? I think, however, that more could have been made of this movie, with its very good cast and interesting subject matter. First of all it ought to have been longer - at least as long as an ordinary feature film. And then I would have wanted to see more of the couple's love and courtship and happy times...
But all in all it was a nice movie, well worth watching!
A bad rehashing of the Edward VIII story with Jane Seymour glamming it up. CBS wanted another "lavish" mini-series so they just $$$$ all over the place.
First they scored Anthony Andrews, Seymour's leading man from 1982's "The Scarlett Pimpernel" - they sparked well there, despite CBS' best efforts. Here, he doesn't act; he simply imitates Edward VIII - and badly. It's embarrassing to watch.
Then, they scored two other actors: Robert Hardy yet again reprising Winston Churchill - somebody had seen him in 1981's "Winston Churchill: the Wilderness Years." He was the man himself in that production; here we see him only sitting and painting.
And then - for me this was the corker - CBS got David Waller to reprise his role as Stanley Baldwin from "Edward & Mrs. Simpson" - the 1980 British production that did this story right the first time. I saw that one, that was meaty work for everybody involved; here, Waller looked like somebody who just found out he was at the wrong party.
First they scored Anthony Andrews, Seymour's leading man from 1982's "The Scarlett Pimpernel" - they sparked well there, despite CBS' best efforts. Here, he doesn't act; he simply imitates Edward VIII - and badly. It's embarrassing to watch.
Then, they scored two other actors: Robert Hardy yet again reprising Winston Churchill - somebody had seen him in 1981's "Winston Churchill: the Wilderness Years." He was the man himself in that production; here we see him only sitting and painting.
And then - for me this was the corker - CBS got David Waller to reprise his role as Stanley Baldwin from "Edward & Mrs. Simpson" - the 1980 British production that did this story right the first time. I saw that one, that was meaty work for everybody involved; here, Waller looked like somebody who just found out he was at the wrong party.
The story of King Edward VIII and The Woman He Loved has been told on two levels, the romantic and the geopolitical. This production starring Anthony Andrews as Edward and Jane Seymour as Wallis Warfield Simpson prretty much opts for the romance.
There is a political angle here though that is barely hinted at. You'll see it in a brief conversation with Andrews and David Waller as Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin where Baldwin tells him Germany is rearming and that will be a big problem for his successor. Andrews says while he is king there will be no British soldiers dying on a European battlefield. Something Hitler counted on.
The Prince of Wales and his lady were big favorites with the Cliveden set of British appeasers. After their wedding in France the Duke and Duchess of Windsor did the grand tour of Europe Hitler rolled out the red carpet for them and had he conquered the Unite Kingdom he would have restored Edward VIII to the throne.
But we love to concentrate on the great romance at least on this side of the pond. If thst's what you want here it is for you.
Andrews and Seymour are a fine royal pair. And making what was her farewell appearance is Olivia deHavilland as Wallis's Aunt Bessie who was her confidante.
If Wallis Warfield Simpson had listened to Aunt Bessie the whole course of history might have changed.
There is a political angle here though that is barely hinted at. You'll see it in a brief conversation with Andrews and David Waller as Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin where Baldwin tells him Germany is rearming and that will be a big problem for his successor. Andrews says while he is king there will be no British soldiers dying on a European battlefield. Something Hitler counted on.
The Prince of Wales and his lady were big favorites with the Cliveden set of British appeasers. After their wedding in France the Duke and Duchess of Windsor did the grand tour of Europe Hitler rolled out the red carpet for them and had he conquered the Unite Kingdom he would have restored Edward VIII to the throne.
But we love to concentrate on the great romance at least on this side of the pond. If thst's what you want here it is for you.
Andrews and Seymour are a fine royal pair. And making what was her farewell appearance is Olivia deHavilland as Wallis's Aunt Bessie who was her confidante.
If Wallis Warfield Simpson had listened to Aunt Bessie the whole course of history might have changed.
I think it is well told. It is mostly accurate and truthful. The subtlety that speaks to the windsor's story, to me, is well acted. I'm not really sure what else to type. It seems we are required to type a lot!! So maybe if you are interested in the Duke and Duchess of Windsor you will find it interesting.
Did you know
- TriviaThis is Olivia de Havilland's last screen appearance.
- GoofsIn one funeral flashback set in 1972, the coffin is carried in with the Duke of Windsor's flag, but the trumpeters have the "GR" cipher of George V, last used in 1936.
- Quotes
Wallis Simpson: I hope it doesn't rain and spoil everything.
Prince of Wales: I thought you like the rain.
Wallis Simpson: I was lying.
- ConnectionsReferenced in The Simpsons: Bart the Murderer (1991)
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content