An Enemy of the People

Doctor Soumitra Chatterjee has been tracking the source of an epidemic and has concluded, after laboratory reports, that that water in the local temple has been polluted and causing the outbreak. Yet there are strong forces opposing him, not only the reigious conservatives, but business interests who see that temple as a souce of tourism and revenue. Even his brother is ranged against him, and more than willing to destroy him rather than close down the temple to fix the problem.

Satyajit Ray;s movie is based on Ibsen's 1882, and sticks mainly to the original's concerns, despite some changes made for its Indian setting. Ray's handling and ending is a little more standardized that the play, but it remains a powerful piece.

Such an excellent movie shot in a House of 2 rooms, 1 press room and one shot outside a temple. And such powerful story; a good and powerful story is enough for compensate for any technicalities. So powerful. sometime reminds of Alfred Hitchcock movies which were shots with such minimum resources yet masterly and splendidly excellent results.

Ganashatru / Enemy Of The People (1990) : Brief Review -

Medical Science faces off Mass Religious Beliefs in this Satyajit Ray's Brave Classic. Far better than many of his acclaimed works. I must say, Satyajit Ray during his last days was on different level altogether. He had few underwhelming (for his high standard i mean) flicks getting overhyped in the rush of his top 10 films during 70s and 80s but his late 90s work is highly underrated. Ganashatru was Ray'a second last film and Agantuk was his last one and these two are surely getting place in my top 10 films of Satyajit Ray. In this adaption of the Ibsen stage play, an idealistic physician discovers that the town's temple waters are dangerously contaminated. But with the community relying on the holy attraction for tourist dollars, his warnings go unheeded. His continuous efforts to spread awareness brings him down and how. Like one quote in the says in the film, "Honest is the one who suffers most." Now you get it. I personally think that the adaption factor has kept this underrated for years and if not, then may be the late 90s audience and their taste for mainstream cinema. Anyways, for me Ganashatru is certified Classic and i would be more than happy if this review helps people to watch it and personally experience whatever i am trying to say. Every actor in the film works like he/she knows exactly what should he/she must do in the role Soumitra Chatterjee, Ruma Guha Thakurta, Mamata Shankar, Dhritiman Chatterjee, Bhishma Guhathakurta, Deepankar De and Subhendu Chatterjee all gave terrific performances. Ray's direction is simply amazing. It isn't intricate, rather it's natural yet intense. That feel-good-bad touch is the best working factor. Overall, another Ray Classic which deserves as equal appreciation as his any top 10 works according to your choice.

RATING - 8/10*

By - #samthebestest.

"Ganashatru" is certainly one of the best movies of Satyajit Ray, though not one of his most popular ones. The story is set up in a small town of India and is brutally realistic. The film depicts the superstitions and ignorance one might find in an Indian town (or for that matter in any Indian City). The main characters are brilliantly portrayed by Soumitra Chatterjee, Dipankar Dey, Subhendu Chatterjee and Dhritiman. The reason this movie has not had any popularity is mainly because of the blind religious superstitions that lives amongst most of us and has blinded us in seeing the truth.

A must watch, if one believes that film makers have a duty towards educating the society.

A public health hazard threatens the lives of an entire city, but when a doctor discovers the truth about its cause, a politician fears that disclosing it will hurt tourism and the local economy. Moreover, in contradiction to science, religious leaders believe that the town will be protected without taking any action, relying on superstitious beliefs. The health issue thus becomes politicized, the heart of this drama, and the one who is trying to tell people the truth is branded an "enemy of the people" by those not acting in the community's best interest. It's brother against brother, when everyone should be working together to prevent an epidemic. The politician distorts the truth in a fiery speech to a crowd, playing on their anger and ignorance, and manipulates others into speaking against him as well.

Satyajit Ray saw in Ibsen's 1882 play truths that applied to India over a century later, and it's easy to see the parallels to the events in America and other nationalist countries over the past couple years, which are really quite striking. That's something that could have really resonated with me, but the trouble is, the film is too lethargic to really enjoy. Most of its scenes are indoors, dialogue-heavy, and repetitive. There is just not enough meat on the bones of this story, and the characters are flat. It has its heart in the right place, and imagining people in the current public eye as the characters in the film provided some level of enjoyment, so for those things it was worth seeing, even if it did fall a little short.