Fantomas: The Man in Black

This film is the second part of Louis Feuillade's brilliant 'Fantomas' series. Although I liked the first part better this is also very good film. It is remarkably well done for 1913; the special effects are convincing (for example the train crash) and there is plenty of action and good characters.

This film will thrill you for the whole hour and leave you wondering after the fabulous cliffhanger ending. Quite amazing for a film over 90 years old. I recommend this film for film students (who should see the whole series, mind you) and especially for those interested in Pre 1920s french cinema.

While I found part one to be a great film, part two seems to be when things really start to get interesting! Part one certainly has its amazing moments, but this continuation seems to be nothing BUT amazing moments! In fact, I was shocked at how entertained I was during all of "Juve Against Fantomas".

At the beginning of the film, there's this huge sequence on a train, and the amount of tension, suspense, and sheer epic quality of that sequence actually gave me goosebumps. This film is so amazingly awesome that it will give you goosebumps. How often do you think a film over 100 years old will do that? Not very often.

"Juve Against Fantomas" proves that bias against such old films is absolutely unnecessary, since quite a few films made in the 1910's still seem great and thrilling as ever!

Much like part one, I have to say how impressed I am for what they were able to accomplish in 1913. The picture is crisp, the story is well-done, there is plenty of action. We even have some rather basic special effects.

The focus shifts in this second part to be more on Juve (the detective) rather than Fantomas (the thief). This gives it a feeling of a chase, and indeed on the train there is plenty of movement and pacing. Juve is always on the move, even if he never knows if he is going in the right direction...

This whole series is incredible, and I highly recommend it to anyone who has an interest in silent film.

Although I have seen the film listed as about 43 minutes long, the version which I have seen runs about 2 hours long. Which version have the others seen? Obviously, a masterpiece when seen with the rest of the Fantomas serial.

Based on the second novel of Souvestre and Allain ,this one is the weakest link.All the first part is incoherent ,whereas "Fantomas:A l'Ombre De La Guillotine" ,in spite of its numerous unlikelihoods ,-also present in the novel of course-,had a plot which made sense ,so to speak..Although I had read it,I found it hard to catch up with the plot.

Things go better in the second half :the basement creates an atmosphere of mystery as Fantomas sends his "mute executor" -an idea Pierre Souvestre and Marcel Allain borrowed from Conan Doyle ,one of Sherlock Holmes's cases-to get rid of Juve.This okay part paved a reliable way for the next,far superior episode.