Aerial Gunner

A typical cheap WWII propaganda movie, but that's not to say it wasn't that bad. Not a great deal of war action until the last 10 minutes of the movie. The target practice scenes using a mobile target on a rail track was historically interesting. Seeing Robert Mitchum was a surprise, as his name did not appear in the opening/ending credits. It goes to show what a small part he plays. The rommance angle of the movie spoilt things a bit. Why do the writers always have two guys fighting over the same woman, when they have only just met her, then propose by the next scene? It would have been much better to stick to the gunnery training scenes, scrub the rommance angle, and have a bit more action.

Hollywood during World War II was slightly schizophrenic as it alternated releasing escapist movies that allowed theater-goers to momentarily forget about the war and patriotic "B" films that reminded all of the continuing threat and the cost of fighting.

"Aerial Gunner" is in the latter category, reflecting Tinseltown's desire to showcase every branch of the service and virtually every specialty (no film that I can recall honored the Graves Registration units nor were black contributions to victory the subject of main features. I wonder why.).

"Aerial Gunner" deals with - aerial gunners, those enlisted men whose skill with machine guns in swerving aircraft under furious attack often made the difference between getting back to base or going down in flames.

The government generously supported these film projects and in this movie the producer, director and cast were given not only stock footage but also a base, hundreds of servicemen as extras and planes to film.

Ex-New York City assistant district attorney John Davis (Richard Arlen) was quite hated before the war by Coney Island barker "Foxy" Pattis for prosecuting his dad, leading to the old man killing himself. Big surprise, both men wind up at aerial gunnery school where SGT Pattis is SGT Davis's instructor. And he's determined to wash the lawyer out. Real original plot.

But then the scriptwriter came up with something truly novel. Both Pattis and Davis fall in love with the same girl, Peggy Lunt, played by Lita Ward. I don't think this had ever been done before in a war movie.

Pattis and Davis are sort of reconciled and, somehow, both wind up in the same unit in the Pacific where Pattis has become both an officer and a pilot (beyond highly unlikely for a noncom who graduated aerial gunnery school).

The rest of the drama is predictable. "Aerial Gunner" offers hefty shots of patriotism and reminds all that Americans make great sacrifices at the front.

What truly enraged me, and I'm sure will infuriate other viewers, was the scene when a gunner calls out that Japanese Zeros were attacking and there immediately is shown a single-engine monoplane with FIXED landing gear. Is there an American kid today who doesn't know that the vaunted Mitsubishi fighter had retractable gear?

5/10 (but it does recapture a time in which movies made the war more immediate and, dare I say it, entertaining).

It is a propaganda war drama shot in 1943. There is romance, action, and nothing special besides that. Chester Morris and Richard Arlen are both worth the watch. Not a rare film though but that doesn't justify not to try it. If you are a gem digger, you should watch it. I don't know the director, never heard of him, but this film is really entertaining and brings however a good ending, in the pure tradition of those years or fight and sacrifice. Yes, a good light hearted propaganda feature to help audiences to forget the horrors of war or at least watch them in a smooth way. Good little film. I recommend it.

After making his screen debut, Robert Mitchum continued to fill our screens by appearing in this film. He's probably eye-candy for a female American audience, or a Western audience who thought all American were tall and broad shouldered like him. There isn't much range in his acting and he doesn't take you by surprise.

I had never even heard of this movie, but I bought the DVD because my father-in-law was a WWII aerial gunner on B-17s in Europe and I'd just recently begun getting him to tell his stories onto audiotape for posterity. I thought that this might add to my knowledge of what he had experienced.

Based on my father-in-law's first hand accounts, I can tell you that the aerial gunnery school sequences in this film are relatively close to what the training was like. (For example, they really did make them assemble a 50 caliber machine gun while blind-folded.) However, the combat/action sequences at the climax of this film miss the mark by a mile.

I'd recommend this film to you if you are a fan of Robert Mitchum and want to see one of his early (uncredited), bit-part roles.

I'd also recommend this film to any fans of Jimmy Lydon, who starred as "Henry Aldrich" in the many "Henry Aldrich" films of the 1940's. Unlike Mitchum, Lydon has a large dramatic role in this picture and since this was filmed during the same era as the Aldrich movies, you could have given this film the alternate title "Henry Aldrich Goes to War".

Unfortunately, sub-par writing, acting, directing, and budget all contribute to the anemic quality of this film. If you're looking for a WWII story with real entertainment value, stick to the period pieces starring John Wayne. I'm giving this film 4 stars based on it's curiosity value alone.