IMDb RATING
7.1/10
1.7K
YOUR RATING
Documentary revealing the nature and process of the fight between the Soviet Union and Germany in the Second World War.Documentary revealing the nature and process of the fight between the Soviet Union and Germany in the Second World War.Documentary revealing the nature and process of the fight between the Soviet Union and Germany in the Second World War.
- Nominated for 1 Oscar
- 3 wins & 1 nomination total
Anthony Veiller
- Narrator
- (voice)
Ion Antonescu
- Self
- (archive footage)
Nikolay Cherkasov
- Alexander Nevsky
- (archive footage)
Anthony Eden
- Self
- (archive footage)
Alexander Edler von Daniels
- Self
- (archive footage)
- (as General Edler von Daniels)
Edgar Garrik
- King Charles XII of Sweden
- (archive footage)
- (as Ye. Karrik)
Hermann Göring
- Self
- (archive footage)
Adolf Hitler
- Self
- (archive footage)
Miklós Horthy
- Self
- (archive footage)
Alfred Jodl
- Self
- (archive footage)
Kaiser Wilhelm II
- Self
- (archive footage)
Wilhelm Keitel
- Self
- (archive footage)
King Boris III
- Self
- (archive footage)
King Michael
- Self
- (archive footage)
General Kosakov
- Self
- (archive footage)
- (as Col. General Kosakoff)
Maxim Litvinov
- Self
- (archive footage)
- (as Maxim Litvinoff)
Yôsuke Matsuoka
- Self
- (archive footage)
- (as Yosuke Matsuoka)
Vyacheslav Molotov
- Self
- (archive footage)
Featured reviews
Part of Frank Capra's "Why We Fight" series of documentary/propaganda films, this film details Russia' involvement in WW2. We see Russia's geography, industry, people, history of repelling invaders and WW2 history.
One of the most bizarre propaganda films you'll ever see: an American film praising Russia. Yes, the US and Russia were allies at the time but the relationship was never that friendly or admiration-filled. Stalin's regime was as reprehensible as Hitler's and the US largely knew this. However, common enemies breed strange bedfellows and Russia with the US (and Britain) would be one of the strangest.
It is well made though. Good use of historic war footage plus dramatizations together with great editing make for a seamless feel to the film. Narration is of the propaganda variety, though you can imagine the narrator having to grit his teeth through some of the pro-Russian bs.
As far as historic accuracy goes, well it is a propaganda film: Russia is made out to be a benevolent democracy (almost) and Stalin a great, friendly leader (rather than a genocidal tyrant). No mention of Russia involvement in the invasion of Poland and their lack of preparation for Germany's invasion is painted as a planned strategy and masterstroke - defence in depth. The broader events are reasonably accurately reported.
Most importantly, the quality that did the most to help Russia win on the Eastern Front is captured - the perseverance and tenacity of the Russian people and their undying resolve to rid themselves of the invader.
One of the most bizarre propaganda films you'll ever see: an American film praising Russia. Yes, the US and Russia were allies at the time but the relationship was never that friendly or admiration-filled. Stalin's regime was as reprehensible as Hitler's and the US largely knew this. However, common enemies breed strange bedfellows and Russia with the US (and Britain) would be one of the strangest.
It is well made though. Good use of historic war footage plus dramatizations together with great editing make for a seamless feel to the film. Narration is of the propaganda variety, though you can imagine the narrator having to grit his teeth through some of the pro-Russian bs.
As far as historic accuracy goes, well it is a propaganda film: Russia is made out to be a benevolent democracy (almost) and Stalin a great, friendly leader (rather than a genocidal tyrant). No mention of Russia involvement in the invasion of Poland and their lack of preparation for Germany's invasion is painted as a planned strategy and masterstroke - defence in depth. The broader events are reasonably accurately reported.
Most importantly, the quality that did the most to help Russia win on the Eastern Front is captured - the perseverance and tenacity of the Russian people and their undying resolve to rid themselves of the invader.
Battle of Russia, The: Part 1 (1943)
Battle of Russia, The: Part 2 (1943)
** 1/2 (out of 4)
The IMDb lists this as a single movie but I'm breaking it into two since it was originally released as two parts. Frank Capra once again shows us the history of Russia in various wars plus how they fought the Nazis during WW2. This here was probably the least interesting of all the Capra docs from this period. Part one focuses on the early years of Russia and I found the storytelling quite dull and tiresome. Part two picks up with WW2 but again, I found it rather tiresome even with the actual war footage.
Battle of Russia, The: Part 2 (1943)
** 1/2 (out of 4)
The IMDb lists this as a single movie but I'm breaking it into two since it was originally released as two parts. Frank Capra once again shows us the history of Russia in various wars plus how they fought the Nazis during WW2. This here was probably the least interesting of all the Capra docs from this period. Part one focuses on the early years of Russia and I found the storytelling quite dull and tiresome. Part two picks up with WW2 but again, I found it rather tiresome even with the actual war footage.
Seven stars. With a little round-up. Because the stuff-blowing-up montages went on too long. Because the stock footage that purported
to be of happy workers in Leningrad should have been showing us skeletal stick
figures. Because Capra just couldn't help being Capra in those scenes of the
people either viewing their destroyed homes and families, or reveling in a faux
return to normalcy during Christmas 1943. And because the film so carefully
ignored things like the Soviet attacks on Poland and Finland in 1939-40. But worth the round-up because the tactical footage was fantastic. And because the film
really did do a good job of showing the "average American" why we were spending
so much to arm the Russians. I also liked the dissection of the strategies of
the two armies on the Eastern front. These WW2 Hollywood propaganda films are
fascinating artifacts. Capra made a bunch of them, without ever getting his
hands dirty. I'm happy that a bunch of them have become available for streaming. I hardly ever find anything I want to watch on N3tfl!x's streaming site. So I have to give them props for this film.
2 November 2020.
2 November 2020.
First of all, this is not a history lesson. This is a film made during the wartime to garner public support for war effort and so whatever propaganda people might complain about is acceptable. Enemy of your enemy is your friend and during WW2, Russia became an ally of allied powers.
The movie talks in details about Russia's rich resources and what would happen to the world of Nazi power got control of it. After that they have taken few big events and given real footage of the battle. The scale of the allied support is captured correctly. The movie takes 50 mins to go over entire 2 and a half year of great struggle so instead of going over every important detail, the director decided to go with the human element of the war. It's more appealing because of it. I hope to see many such movies of how allies worked with each other to dethrone largest military force in human history.
The movie talks in details about Russia's rich resources and what would happen to the world of Nazi power got control of it. After that they have taken few big events and given real footage of the battle. The scale of the allied support is captured correctly. The movie takes 50 mins to go over entire 2 and a half year of great struggle so instead of going over every important detail, the director decided to go with the human element of the war. It's more appealing because of it. I hope to see many such movies of how allies worked with each other to dethrone largest military force in human history.
This is the fifth of seven films in the "Why We Fight" series that was directed by Frank Capra. These pictures are documentaries as well as propaganda...with a strong emphasis on propaganda in order to bolster support for the war effort. Of the seven films, perhaps "The Battle of Russia" is the one which emphases propaganda much more than facts. Using selective information, the film makes a strong message--our friends, the Russians, are plucky and will NOT roll over for the invading Germans...and they need our help. To make message, the film strongly emphasizes some facts while ignoring the many bad things about Stalinist Russia...such as repression, the Russia-Germany non-aggression pact and Stalin himself. This isn't too surprising, as Hollywood did an about face with Russia during the war. While pre- war films, such as "Comrad X", made fun of the Soviets and mocked their system, now that they were allies in the war, a new and ridiculously idealistic view of the USSR made its way into movies such as "The North Star". After all...they were now the American's new strange bedfellow. And, it's because of the combinations of truths and many half truths and omissions that the film is only fair despite its strong message.
Did you know
- TriviaThis film is in the public domain; it was never registered or renewed.
- Alternate versionsA version exists where the film is divided into two parts because of its length. There are extra titles to explain this division, and a short recapitulation of Part I is found at the beginning of Part II.
- ConnectionsFeatured in The Battle of China (1944)
- How long is The Battle of Russia?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- The Battle of Russia: The Nazi March Frozen
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 23m(83 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content