A cute, mysterious woman moves in across from Gene, a cop/novelist. He's invited over in the evening, but finds her murdered and calls the cops. Next day, it's as if it never happened. Is he... Read allA cute, mysterious woman moves in across from Gene, a cop/novelist. He's invited over in the evening, but finds her murdered and calls the cops. Next day, it's as if it never happened. Is he going crazy?A cute, mysterious woman moves in across from Gene, a cop/novelist. He's invited over in the evening, but finds her murdered and calls the cops. Next day, it's as if it never happened. Is he going crazy?
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Sheree J. Wilson
- Emily Talbert
- (as Sheree Wilson)
Kirk Jordan
- Detective
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
5.8515
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
What's Real And What Isn't?
Here's a modern-day film noir in which you're never sure what's real and what isn't real. There is a possibility you may get tired of guessing and give up on this film 3/4ths of the way through, as I almost did but it worth finishing. It also was better the second time around
The problem is just too many flashbacks. If some of those scenes were not replayed so often, or a few of the many twists eliminated, it would have been a super movie. It still was fascinating in parts. It grabs you, and you can't stop watching to see what the real story is. Along the way, is a bunch of nice colors and some nice film noir-type in the beginning and then during the ending credits.
The problem is just too many flashbacks. If some of those scenes were not replayed so often, or a few of the many twists eliminated, it would have been a super movie. It still was fascinating in parts. It grabs you, and you can't stop watching to see what the real story is. Along the way, is a bunch of nice colors and some nice film noir-type in the beginning and then during the ending credits.
Past tense, present tense, future tense...who can tell the difference?
First of all, anyone who claims that he or she didn't find this head-scratcher confusing must be the next freakin' Einstein! The plot is maybe more tangled than that of "The Usual Suspects", and there are enough distorted/out-of-chronological order events, half-remembered/repeated/altered lines and "was-it-all-a-dream-or-was-it-real?" tricks to baffle even the most avid mystery fan. Generally, movies with multiple twists and turns can be great fun, but this one is so contrived that it tried my patience. Besides, I don't understand why Lara Flynn Boyle had to whisper almost all of her lines (to come off as "seductive", perhaps?), or why they would pair her romantically with Scott Glenn, an actor almost 30 years older than her. (**)
"bits and pieces, it's all a mess"
Former cop Gene Ralston (Scott Glenn) is haunted by confusion and is writing a hard-boiled crime novel about his new sexy neighbor (Lara Flynn Boyle). He has a sexual fling with her and a woman turns up dead there. More confusion arises. He fears evidence is piling up against him as his partner Larry Talbert (Anthony LaPaglia) investigates. Suddenly, there is a different woman living in that house and the murder never happened.
This starts as a neo-noir. It pushes very hard but that's acceptable. The problem starts with the confusing bits and pieces. It's intriguing when it first begins but soon it becomes tiresome. With all the jumbled pieces, the progression feels rather random. The pieces are all there. The fit is up in the air. At least, it's trying to do something.
This starts as a neo-noir. It pushes very hard but that's acceptable. The problem starts with the confusing bits and pieces. It's intriguing when it first begins but soon it becomes tiresome. With all the jumbled pieces, the progression feels rather random. The pieces are all there. The fit is up in the air. At least, it's trying to do something.
Very confusing film
The movie "past tense" is rated with an "8" here. UNBELIEVABLE!!!!!! I watched the film for about 1 hour, then i turned it of, it was that bad. Very confusing with a lot of flashbacks. One moment the guy seemed to be in very good shape, the next he's in a coma in the hospital. And it started so well, i mean, the 2 main-actors hitting the sack after just 5 minutes, that's a new record for sure,guys.
gets worse from minute to minute
The promissing cast starts good with nice scenes between the beautiful Lara Flynn-Boyle and Scott Glenn as the sensitive cop. But the story gets so weird: Lots of cheap flashbacks and "mysterious" knifes, glasses and fruits falling on the ground uuups! oh, you mean this is suspense? Then watch it. I didn´t enjoy it: 4 out of 10. To less Lara F.B. for to much movie.
Did you know
- TriviaA TV movie for the Showtime network.
- ConnectionsReferences Psycho (1960)
- SoundtracksI Only Have Eyes for You
Music by Harry Warren (uncredited)
Lyrics by Al Dubin (uncredited)
Performed by The Flamingos
Courtesy of Rhino Records
By Arrangement with Warner Special Products
Warner Bros., Inc. (ASCAP)
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Dos veces muerta
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content



