An artist tries to rescue her scientist boyfriend, who has switched bodies with an evil, elderly genius.An artist tries to rescue her scientist boyfriend, who has switched bodies with an evil, elderly genius.An artist tries to rescue her scientist boyfriend, who has switched bodies with an evil, elderly genius.
Pat Millicano
- 1st Paramedic
- (as Pat Malicano)
Chantel Rae
- Woman in bath
- (as Chantel King)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
3.32K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
2ozq
Naked Desperation
This littler sucker came on late night TV and I ended up watching, almost like a train wreck. You keep watching, totally amazed these good actors (Dean Stockwell, David Warner & the cute Brian Krause) are stuck in this badly concepted movie. The script sucks, and Pamela Anderson is there purely for sex - both with Krause (one rather vivid scene in particular - not necessary to plot) and fondling other women in the name of fine art.
Don't trust the physics - very shaky and zero credibility. There's little the actors or director could do with such a sucky script. Add a few bad actors in with a few decent ones - and you can really tell the difference. The best scene in my opinion is between Krause and Stockwell as Krause is leaving the university, but the rest is really struggling. While maybe not Z-grade, it's awfully close. Might be so bad its funny for some.
For very late night TV it's perfect. To buy or rent, don't waste your money unless you're a fan of any of the actors mentioned above.
Don't trust the physics - very shaky and zero credibility. There's little the actors or director could do with such a sucky script. Add a few bad actors in with a few decent ones - and you can really tell the difference. The best scene in my opinion is between Krause and Stockwell as Krause is leaving the university, but the rest is really struggling. While maybe not Z-grade, it's awfully close. Might be so bad its funny for some.
For very late night TV it's perfect. To buy or rent, don't waste your money unless you're a fan of any of the actors mentioned above.
If you're a fan of Pam, go for it
The acting and plotting of this film is just plain boring and pretty terrible. If, however, you like to see Pamela Anderson's fantastic body (I do, but it doesn't make a film), then you'll get something out of this. The T&A is highly enjoyable, but ultimately this film feels pointless and uninteresting. 2/10.
Naked Pamela
Taken as a sci-fi thriller, "Naked Souls" lies somewhere between "mediocre" and "not bad". The ideas (mind-switching, memory transfer, etc) are intriguing, even if they have been used in many other films (the French thriller "La Machine", with Depardieu, is one that comes to mind), but this film goes nowhere with them. However, Pamela Anderson looks breathtakingly gorgeous here (I don't remember ever seeing her look better), and she has one particularly sensual sex scene (damn was her partner a lucky guy!). The filmmakers must have liked that scene too, because they repeat it in the last few minutes....and it's actually better the second time because it's not intercut (like it is the first time) with David Warner's reactions. No disrespect to Warner, who is a fine actor, but he kind of kills the mood in this instance, if you know what I mean....(**)
Title Says It All
I'm willing to bet hard money you picked this up for the same reason I did as 'Naked Souls' isn't subtle about why we should give it a go. Check out that box cover. So sit back and watch a b-movie plot on mind transfer and wait in anticipation for Pam to show up and get naked.
There's no denying she looked great sans clothes back in 1996 and ultimately that's what its all about here. Brian Krause plays the young scientist who comes up with this tech. Pam his girlfriend. While David Warner plays the rich old benefactor who supplies him with cash and has an ulterior motive to get closer to his work. Dean Stockwell puts in a quick paycheck role.
There's a half-baked serial killer angle attached which allows for the sight of more female nudity, but it never goes anywhere being barely built up too. 'Naked Souls' doesn't have a story or characters worth talking about at length. It does however supply what you came for in the end allowing Pamela to go topless and get felt up twice looking great.
There's no denying she looked great sans clothes back in 1996 and ultimately that's what its all about here. Brian Krause plays the young scientist who comes up with this tech. Pam his girlfriend. While David Warner plays the rich old benefactor who supplies him with cash and has an ulterior motive to get closer to his work. Dean Stockwell puts in a quick paycheck role.
There's a half-baked serial killer angle attached which allows for the sight of more female nudity, but it never goes anywhere being barely built up too. 'Naked Souls' doesn't have a story or characters worth talking about at length. It does however supply what you came for in the end allowing Pamela to go topless and get felt up twice looking great.
Saying Pamela Anderson...
...is the best part of a movie is truly scary, but there it is. She and Brian Krause roll around naked, while David Warner and Dean Stockwell do the best they can to save this turkey. However, the basic plot is mediocre at best: even a better actress (meaning...well just about anyone, except maybe Anna Nicole Smith) and Sir John Gielgud would have had their work cut out for them making anything out of this plot.
Did you know
- TriviaPamela Anderson justified her participation in the movie's sex scenes by claiming that they were important to the story and saying that she trusted the filmmakers. Lyndon Chubbuck had previously directed her in three episodes of Baywatch (1989).
- ConnectionsReferenced in The Angry Video Game Nerd: V.I.P. With Pamela Anderson (2014)
- How long is Naked Souls?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $500,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 31m(91 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content








