A Streetcar Named Desire

This is mostly a fine production of the venerable Tennessee Williams classic. Baldwin relies a bit too heavily on Brando portrayal but Lange finds her own way. She gives the doomed, fragile Blanche an inner strength that most other interpretors do not. Lane and Goodman are fine, as well.

I realize that these commentaries should not try to answer to previously written ones. Those things should be reserved for the message boards. But I simply have to answer to some kind of general consensus, that I have no idea where some of the people writing these reviews get their ideas from. I am appalled that someone was looking for more sex and violence. That was not in the intention or the writing of Tennessee Williams. 'Nuf said.

I think that this production was so very fine. I saw Diane Lane bring a quality to Stella that no one else ever has. You can read her feelings on her face. How torn she is between her love for Stanley and the remembrances of a loving older sister. AND she is beautiful. She is everything that makes us understand that Stanley really couldn't stand to lose her. And Alec Baldwin as Stanley brought a humanity to his portrayal that others, even the famed Brando, did not...it is called REALITY. He was real. Baldwin was not the stereotype that Blanche wanted to convince Stella that he was. It was true that he knew the seamier side of life, so he recognized that part of Blanche that was, indeed, the fallen woman.[And, by the way, his accent was meant to be from New York, not the South.] But I also could see his very real pain of being talked down by Blanche, the fear of losing Stella because of Blanche trying to pull her away from him. Yes, he does turn mean and uncaring, which Stella especially can not understand. But he does so because Blanche is threatening his entire life, and the love of his life. So, he fights back. I have seen the '49 movie many times, and several staged productions, and have memorized and done scenes from the play myself. I have never seen anyone play Stanley with the pain, and the fear that Baldwin brought to the part.

I thought that John Goodman did a remarkable turn in the role of Mitch. If others couldn't get the comedy of his TV role out of their minds, I don't credit that to a fault in Goodman, but a fault in the viewer. Blanche was once beautiful and still was very attractive, but as she says "played out". She wasn't looking for a "beautiful boy" any more, even though her closing in insanity drew her that way. She was looking for a safe cleft in the rock in which she could hide. Goodman played Mitch as gentle, and caring and concerned about his looks not being up to the standards of someone like the Blanche that he perceived.

I felt that Jessica Lange was the one person that had seen the old movie, and Vivian Leigh's performance too much. Her accent was just like Leigh's. But she was good. She also won an Emmy for Best Actress for that performance if memory serves. But the two performances that just made me weep were Baldwin's and Lane's. Lane as Stella says to Stanley, "You didn't see her when she was young, no one was as trusting as Blanche." and I felt every word. But when Diane Lane cries at the end with such depth of anguish, I said to myself, that I would just watch and wait for her to win an Oscar. [I know, I'm still waiting, but she will, one of these days] She is the real thing, boys and girls. That woman is not only beautiful, but she can act circles around the lot of them. Her casting made Stella into a very real person. And I totally believed the love that she and Stanley had for each other. I can not say the same for Kim Hunter who did win an Oscar for her portrayal of the same part.

I have long loved this play. We can not help but love the old movie. But this production tears my heart out.

In exact opposition to the 1984 Ann Margret version, this Streetcar ride starts of a bit jittery but manages to find its footing soon enough. This is especially true , imo, ofJessica Lange's take on Blanche. Not a fanof it at first, especially the stereotypical and annoying breathless thing she does with her voice to convey a lady. She also seems to lack some vulnetability, and I echo the belief , as superficial as it may be, that Lange is a bit..er..big and buxomy for the part, not frail enough, which is needed. However as the film progresses so does she and when the s---t starts hitting the fan, Lange finally starts shinning as she should, and in the last scene she is just tremendous...Lange doesnt play her as berserk and crazy like Ann Margret, but just as a completely broken woman...its heartbreaking. As far as Stanley, Baldwin is my absolute favorite Stanley (and Ive seen quite a few, Im sort of obsessed with this play) after Brando.Why? He plays up Stanley's humanity....you see his hurt, not just when he thinks Stella might leave him, but his genuine hurt at being looked at as a brainless ape. He's charming and even warm (ish) to Blanche at times..and unlike Brando, even gets that Stanley is just as intimidated and attracted to Blanche as she is to him. This Stan is a fairly nice , decent, blue collar guy driven to uglyness because this woman just pushes the wrong buttons. He's handsome but not the sexual beast that in the Brando version eclipses, wrongly at times, the meaning of the play. Lane is wonderfull, sweet and well meaning, conflicted and in pain as Stella Goodman as Mitch leaves much to be desired ( as the actor later afmitted himself). The setting is well done and the best part is Williams play is unadultarated in this version, almost word for word the original play as written. Chose this over the 84 version if you can

Wow. Still reeling from this one several hours later. What a true and deep and affecting performance from Jessica Lange plus the usual intelligent and imaginative choices from Alec Baldwin. I've seen a few productions of this, plus the Brando movie. I have never before been left with such depth of feeling for ALL of those characters trying to find their feet again in the conflicts and complexities of that post World War 2 society.

Tennessee Williams is a legend. This play is a true masterpiece. So it's worth watching it no matter how the actors do. And they do pretty well. Alec Baldwin gives us possibly his best acting, but possibly Jessica Lange doesn't reach this level, while having a role most actresses would beg for years to have. John Goodman is fine and gives a perspective of Mitch I hadn't in mind but he's a bit characterized as a comedy type and possibly that creates problems. Diane Lane is ok but nothing special (it's the less demanding role anyway). The scenery is better than the original film but the film has been PC transformed. Too mild for what Williams wanted to show.