IMDb RATING
4.9/10
4.5K
YOUR RATING
Two NYC roommates have a pact to jump off Brooklyn Bridge if they haven't found life partners before she's 30. That's less than a month away.Two NYC roommates have a pact to jump off Brooklyn Bridge if they haven't found life partners before she's 30. That's less than a month away.Two NYC roommates have a pact to jump off Brooklyn Bridge if they haven't found life partners before she's 30. That's less than a month away.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
4.94.4K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
5=G=
Yawn!
"If Lucy Fell" tells of a man and woman who have known each other since childhood, live together platonically, and are both single and looking for love unsuccessfully. Hmmm...what do you suppose is going to happen??
Schaeffer's shot at telling this old no-brainer in "If Lucy Fell" doesn't distinguish itself in any way and though it has it's moments they are few and far between. The film has many deficits with the most obvious being the lack of sincere sentiment and the usual gushing emotional crescendo at the end. What sentiment there is seems forced and awkward. A so-so little indie romcom which is watchable but not recommendable. (C)
Schaeffer's shot at telling this old no-brainer in "If Lucy Fell" doesn't distinguish itself in any way and though it has it's moments they are few and far between. The film has many deficits with the most obvious being the lack of sincere sentiment and the usual gushing emotional crescendo at the end. What sentiment there is seems forced and awkward. A so-so little indie romcom which is watchable but not recommendable. (C)
No Offense...
...to Eric Schaeffer, but he's not the leading man type. He's a decent actor, writer, and director, but should stick to acting parts that fit his persona. The handsome, desirable leading man is not his strong suit.
Beyond that, the movie is predictable. We knew the ending right from the beginning. It is an inoffensive, puff piece of a movie, easily forgotten once it is over.
The only slightly interesting part is seeing Scarlett Johansson in one of her earliest roles. Beyond that, there's nothing original here.
Beyond that, the movie is predictable. We knew the ending right from the beginning. It is an inoffensive, puff piece of a movie, easily forgotten once it is over.
The only slightly interesting part is seeing Scarlett Johansson in one of her earliest roles. Beyond that, there's nothing original here.
How Time Changes Perspective on a Classic Romance
I first saw this movie as a teenager and loved it just as much as *When Harry Met Sally*. However, rewatching it as an adult, my feelings have changed significantly. While the movie was good for its time, I now see that Sarah Jessica Parker and Eric Schaeffer have no chemistry together. Eric Schaeffer, though talented, doesn't quite fit the role he plays.
I also feel his character could have had a more compelling storyline with Elle Macpherson's character. Despite their minimal chemistry, it still surpassed that of his with Sarah Jessica Parker. Perhaps the issue lies in the "platonic best friends fall in love" cliché, which wasn't as overdone when the movie was first released. A different narrative focus might have resulted in a more engaging love story.
Additionally, while *When Harry Met Sally* remains timeless despite its use of clichés, this movie hasn't aged as well. The supporting cast, while enjoyable, doesn't quite make up for the central lack of chemistry.
I also feel his character could have had a more compelling storyline with Elle Macpherson's character. Despite their minimal chemistry, it still surpassed that of his with Sarah Jessica Parker. Perhaps the issue lies in the "platonic best friends fall in love" cliché, which wasn't as overdone when the movie was first released. A different narrative focus might have resulted in a more engaging love story.
Additionally, while *When Harry Met Sally* remains timeless despite its use of clichés, this movie hasn't aged as well. The supporting cast, while enjoyable, doesn't quite make up for the central lack of chemistry.
A sure cure for insomnia
I rented this movie some time ago, thinking it would be great, especially with Sarah Jessica Parker and Ben Stiller. However, I found the movie very disappointing . It did not keep my attention and I kept waiting for it to "get good". It never did. I ended up falling asleep. Unlike other movies I have fallen asleep on, I did not feel the need to try to watch it again, especially when spending money to rent it. In fact, I could not wait to get the tape back video store. However, whenever I have trouble sleeping, I do consider purchasing a copy of this movie to help me fall asleep.
After reading other comments, I see that some people liked this movie and thought it was clever and smart, so it must have some enjoyable and entertaining value from a view point I am either lacking or just have not applied. However, it is definitely no Something About Mary, or You Got Mail which are wonderful romantic comedies, yet very different from each other.
After reading other comments, I see that some people liked this movie and thought it was clever and smart, so it must have some enjoyable and entertaining value from a view point I am either lacking or just have not applied. However, it is definitely no Something About Mary, or You Got Mail which are wonderful romantic comedies, yet very different from each other.
Just as bad as I remember
I saw this in the movies. I think it was the one and only time in my entire life I've fallen asleep in public. But that might have been my date. Either way, this movie was terrible. Now, I've seen it again. It wasn't just age or what was going on with my life - or who I was with. This is a terrible movie. The two lead characters who are supposed to be best friends are mean to each other and do not communicate clearly. Joe, the lead "male" and writer of the movie, dresses like a girl - complete with headband and dresses and leggings. In fact, he dresses like a little girl in the 1980's. The lead woman, played by SJP, who I can never hate, is just not likable. Nor does she make sense. One second she likes Ben Stiller's pointless character, the next she's rolling her eyes at him like the rest of us. The base story is interesting and one of my favorites, I won't spoil what that is, but suffice it to say there was plenty of potential. This movie doesn't carry it off. The editing is bad - but perhaps that's mostly the fault of a shallow script and unlikeable characters. The actors can't be faulted. They do their best with virtually no material.
Did you know
- TriviaEmily Hart's film debut.
- GoofsWhen Joe is out jogging, he is being approached by two joggers coming the opposite direction. The first man has purple shorts and the second has purple jogging pants. However, after Joe is shown and camera returns to what Joe sees, the man in the jogging pants has completely disappeared.
- Quotes
Al: I'm proud of you Joe.
Joe MacGonaughgill: Why?
Al: You finally figured out the girl in your heart isn't the girl in your dreams. Some people don't figure it out all their lives.
- How long is If Lucy Fell?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Quiéreme antes de los 30
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $5,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $2,420,162
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $1,308,088
- Mar 10, 1996
- Gross worldwide
- $2,420,162
- Runtime
- 1h 32m(92 min)
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content






