Blackjack

John Woo, whose film resume consists of classic action films

such as "Face/Off" and "Hard Boiled," steps into the world of

television in this action-packed, yet awfully dull thriller. Big

Swede Dolph Lundgren stars as Jack Devlin, a bodyguard with a

penchant for arming himself with so many handguns in his body,

it would make Charlten Heston blush! Devlin is hired to guard a

hot fashion model named Cinder (the fine Kam Heskin) from a

vicious serial killer on a huge ego-trip.

"Blackjack" has many fine looking stunts, with cool gunfights

and pyrotechniques that trademark John Woo's style of film. Yet,

this movie isn't as violent as his previous films, because

obviously it was shown on the USA network. In other words, a

cable channel can't go for excessive gun-induced violence.

Also, the editing in this film was lousy and trite as well.

There was a scene where Devlin shoots a guy several times,

supposedly killing the assassin. But later, the same man comes

up unharmed, ready to try to waste our hero twice! Huh??! What,

is that one hitman immune to bullets?

The acting in this film is at least more decent than the

production values. Hey, Lundgren still needs to work on his

lines, but compared to his past movies, at least the script is

much smarter. Maybe it's just the actor who needs improvement.

Overall, "Blackjack" is a good movie, but it ain't great folks.

Go blame that on the fact that it is a

There's something about Dolph Lundgren that makes him a likable actor. It may be because of his (seemingly) clean personal life, or that he has never tried to portray himself greater than he is (unlike actors like Steven Seagal.) Here, Lundgren gives one of his better performances. He seems very comfortable and assured here, giving off more emotion than he has in other movies. And it's always fun to see Saul Rubinek and Fred Williamson in a movie, and their presence boosts things.

Other than the actors, all I can say in favor of this movie are that the production values aren't bad for a made-for-TV movie. This movie is a mess! Starting with the action scenes. Now, I know Woo was confined by TV censorship rules, but he clearly could still do a lot. Yet every action scene is horribly done - badly edited, improper use of slow-motion, and with the camera often in the wrong place and/or angle. You see the great potential in these scenes, yet Woo botches it each time. Seeing them, it's hard to believe this is the same guy who did the action scenes in HARD BOILED or THE KILLER.

There are plenty of plot holes as well. For example, how does Lundgren get in the fashion show near the end when it's supposedly been tightened up with security? Where is the villain getting all these people to help him? Why does the villain retreat back to his hideout after the secrecy of it was blown? And on and on. But the worst thing about the movie is that it's simply boring. It's slow-moving, and filled with a lot of unnecessary things that easily could have been edited out. Don't "bet" on this one should you see it in the video store - it's a "bust"!

Joh Woo has used over and over the slow motion scenes in his action sequences and he always finds a special trick to regenerate his style.But this time,it is a little too much clichéd.Your libido will be absorbed by the blond fluffy bunnies swirling around Dolph Lundgren's muscles and the action scenes are totally unrealistic but this is where all the fun comes from.John Woo always tended to stylize his movies and this one is no exception to the rule.His obsessions for choreography of bullets and killed bodies, as well as friendship and honor, are strongly embedded in all his movies. Unfortunately this movie was made for TV and it demoted the result.

This is differant for Dolph Lundgren, usually he only does B-Grade movies, but this one is a little differant. Its an enjoyable John Woo film with great action and great acting, But what the hell is up with him not being able to look at the colour White, that was a bite stupid. anyway I really enjoyed this film and would recommend it to anyone.

7/10

This movie was good, but it wasn't the best. I wasn't too impressed with the acting, except for Kam Heskin (Cinder)'s. I thought she was the best actress in the whole movie, but didn't really have too much fun stuff to do. The movie, other than lack of acting by the lead role, Dolph Lungdren's Jack, was actually pretty good, even if you don't like action movies.