User reviews

The first half of this movie is good, and I found it very interesting, but as the film progresses, it becomes less of a story, and more of a low budget film, that misses a story line. The lack of a story in the end hurts this film, and I would guess the makers thought well lets just end the thing. After the film was, over I said and what's next?

This film has to be the worst zombie movie i have ever seen and i have seen heaps of them.IT starts off with people shooting the zombies with guns in a paddock and then they think they killed them all but one survived and then 14 years later they start to come back.The acting in the film is pretty bad and the zombies have very poor makeup next to none.And the zombies just walk around trying to make scary faces which are not scary but all the gory blood is good and Tom savini has a little part in the film.YOU should not waste your money on hiring this movie hire dawn of the dead to see a good zombie film.The most money i would pay to buy this film would be $3 or less over all i give this film 4 out of 10 i would give it 3 but i love zombie movies so i gave it 4

So bad it's good. For some reason they've followed the same formula as 'ZOMBIE 4' & '5'...why? Maybe they thought they were good zombie movies...with all the flashbacks and the convoluted back story...who knows? Anyway, this one is worth it just to see Tom Savini as not only an actor but as the "Stunt Coordinator". We get to see a fifteen-minute sequence with Tom fighting off zombies (while muttering to himself and sounding like Popeye for some reason). It's awesome as we see this "Stunt" master work his magic (especially his Starsky & Hutchian car roof slides...oh and the rope "stunt" in the barn loft is priceless). Finally, there is the sweet irony of how bad the make-up effects are (which Tom has nothing to do with...and it shows).