Action-packed sequel to THE EVILMAKER. A family member of the victim in part 1 tries to figure out what happened at that cabin in the woods not long ago. Before you know it, the body count b... Read allAction-packed sequel to THE EVILMAKER. A family member of the victim in part 1 tries to figure out what happened at that cabin in the woods not long ago. Before you know it, the body count begins and a supernatural being makes its presence known...Action-packed sequel to THE EVILMAKER. A family member of the victim in part 1 tries to figure out what happened at that cabin in the woods not long ago. Before you know it, the body count begins and a supernatural being makes its presence known...
Shannon Barksdale
- Madam Vladmeria
- (as Shannon)
Serena Miller
- The Minion
- (as Sara Miller)
- …
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
"Abomination: EvilMaker 2" is an adequate sequel to the original without going over the same ground. The new lead is not as powerful as the original (Stephanie Beaton), but she comes across as so sincere and good-natured that she does the job. Big surprise is Jon Wilmot, who underplays the role of the disgraced ex-cop successfully. It is indeed Felicia Pandolfi, back in form as one of our favorite "b-movie goth chicks" who brings the most energy. Musical score is above average for an effort of this type. DVD also has some very good features about the making of the film, and the film makers, to their credit, point out several obstacles they had to try to overcome to finish the film. The last 20:00 does contain some good twist and turns, one or two that I could not predict. Whereas the b-movie horror makers in California are more or less a heartless machine (I've never liked the films of Fred Ray, Winorski or their ilk), I would prefer renting or buying a horror film done for the right reasons, like this one. It took a second viewing to spot the subtle color scheme whenever sister Racheal appears. Here's hoping there will be a nice wrap up, completing a memorable low-budget trilogy.
I didn't understand this movie at all. Something about a girl that got killed and someone investigating. I wouldn't recommend it at all. The picture is grainy, it looks like it was shot with a VHS camcorder and the audio was so low I had to turn my TV all the way up and still could barely hear it.
There was some possession thing going on and some girl got covered in ice cream in one scene (this is an effect? WHAT?!?!) and there was some horrible looking "animated" effects that made me cringe. I thought the effects in Japanese movies were bad, the opticals in this thing were atrocious. This movie is actually the first rental where I asked for a refund of my rental money and when the manager popped the movie into a machine and saw the quality, he was gracious enough to give me a free rental because of the awful quality. (I rented Blood Works and it was GOOD.) People should not be charged to view this kind of thing, the entire budget couldn't have been more than the $4.00 rental charge.
I will say the box art got me to rent this movie, but never again. Avoid this movie at any and all cost, folks. Nothing personal to the folks who made it (I assume they had a $3.99 budget, a camcorder, and some ambition), but this is the kind of thing that you keep in the closet and maybe just show it to your friends and family, saying "hey, I made a movie." That this was commercially released and packaged at all is truly...an abomination. The title says it all and never again will I get suckered by good artwork and movies with no stars, there's no redeeming quality at all to the presentation save a couple of scenes with bare breasted women (and if you want to see this, rent something good, like Basic Instinct).
They really should label these movies properly on the boxes, saying "made by amateurs with a camcorder", that way the public wouldn't be suckered into renting this trash. Glad I didn't purchase this, but I guess the disc would've made a nice frisbee.
Believe it or not, the DVD contains making of stuff and it's exactly what you think it is: people standing around in front of a camcorder. That's right, one camcorder filming another camcorder, I couldn't believe it. Family barbeques are more entertaining.
Skip this one. Worse than Blood Cult.
There was some possession thing going on and some girl got covered in ice cream in one scene (this is an effect? WHAT?!?!) and there was some horrible looking "animated" effects that made me cringe. I thought the effects in Japanese movies were bad, the opticals in this thing were atrocious. This movie is actually the first rental where I asked for a refund of my rental money and when the manager popped the movie into a machine and saw the quality, he was gracious enough to give me a free rental because of the awful quality. (I rented Blood Works and it was GOOD.) People should not be charged to view this kind of thing, the entire budget couldn't have been more than the $4.00 rental charge.
I will say the box art got me to rent this movie, but never again. Avoid this movie at any and all cost, folks. Nothing personal to the folks who made it (I assume they had a $3.99 budget, a camcorder, and some ambition), but this is the kind of thing that you keep in the closet and maybe just show it to your friends and family, saying "hey, I made a movie." That this was commercially released and packaged at all is truly...an abomination. The title says it all and never again will I get suckered by good artwork and movies with no stars, there's no redeeming quality at all to the presentation save a couple of scenes with bare breasted women (and if you want to see this, rent something good, like Basic Instinct).
They really should label these movies properly on the boxes, saying "made by amateurs with a camcorder", that way the public wouldn't be suckered into renting this trash. Glad I didn't purchase this, but I guess the disc would've made a nice frisbee.
Believe it or not, the DVD contains making of stuff and it's exactly what you think it is: people standing around in front of a camcorder. That's right, one camcorder filming another camcorder, I couldn't believe it. Family barbeques are more entertaining.
Skip this one. Worse than Blood Cult.
This was released on the Brain Damage films label, and from my experience they release a few good low-budget horror movies ("The Coven" namely), and the rest of their releases are utter garbage. Abomination is utter garbage, make no mistake.
It looks like it was shot on VHS video, the picture is extremely murky (i saw it on DVD). The sound is like it was all recorded on location with cheap equipment and never mixed from the raw stock. It's very difficult to hear the dialogue many times throughout the movie.
The acting is VERY BAD, even for a no-budget film such as this. The plot is equally as terrible. When i read the DVD cover in the rental store it sounded like it might be a good little movie, but alas i was wrong. It's quite boring also, nothing very interesting happens until near the end...and even that is rather stupid.
The special effects are laughable, we have "vomit" that looks very much like Tapioca Pudding (i guess that is what it really was). The death scenes are so fake it is almost hilarious when you're watching them.
What amazes me is that the DVD for Abomination includes a "Making Of" that is over an hour long, another 36+ minutes of interviews, and another 15+ minutes of bloopers/outtakes. No, i did not waste my time watching any of those! Who exactly would waste their valuable time to know more about this movie?!?!?
The only saving grace i can possibly think of during this film was the music score had a few good moments. That's it...no scares...no laughs...some brief nudity, but the women are not very good looking...
There are so many low-budget horror films out there that are vastly better than Abomination. Even if you are the type of horror fan who watches every horror film released (like me), you should avoid this like the plague........
It looks like it was shot on VHS video, the picture is extremely murky (i saw it on DVD). The sound is like it was all recorded on location with cheap equipment and never mixed from the raw stock. It's very difficult to hear the dialogue many times throughout the movie.
The acting is VERY BAD, even for a no-budget film such as this. The plot is equally as terrible. When i read the DVD cover in the rental store it sounded like it might be a good little movie, but alas i was wrong. It's quite boring also, nothing very interesting happens until near the end...and even that is rather stupid.
The special effects are laughable, we have "vomit" that looks very much like Tapioca Pudding (i guess that is what it really was). The death scenes are so fake it is almost hilarious when you're watching them.
What amazes me is that the DVD for Abomination includes a "Making Of" that is over an hour long, another 36+ minutes of interviews, and another 15+ minutes of bloopers/outtakes. No, i did not waste my time watching any of those! Who exactly would waste their valuable time to know more about this movie?!?!?
The only saving grace i can possibly think of during this film was the music score had a few good moments. That's it...no scares...no laughs...some brief nudity, but the women are not very good looking...
There are so many low-budget horror films out there that are vastly better than Abomination. Even if you are the type of horror fan who watches every horror film released (like me), you should avoid this like the plague........
How on earth did this actually make it to video store shelves? I honestly do not understand how that occurred. This movie could only be considered cool if a group of my friends made it after drinking all day, as a joke. Also, it pretty much goes without saying that anyone who gave this "film" even a remotely positive review was either A) somehow involved with the cast or crew or B) twelve years old, and excited he got to rent a movie with topless girls in it, without his parents noticing. (Note in regards to the topless girls: NOT the kind of girls you want to see take their clothes off.) The only good thing I can say about this movie, is that it kind of inspired me to get a group of people together, get wasted, and improv a ridiculously bad horror film....which is pretty much what Abomination seems to have done, anyway.
Nearly unwatchable trash from the studio of BrainDamage films...I got this in a set (Vamps) with 3 other low low quality movies. Now, I like low budget crap, and I love horror movies...this was Z-grade disappointment. Horrible writing, acting, directing, sound, sets, etc. Gives indie films and BrainDamage a bad, bad name.
The plot is barely decipherable (girl goes to house where sister disappeared w/ fat cop in tow, they enter a new dimension). I pretty much had to fast forward to prevent from hanging myself. Slow, incoherent drivel seems like it was written the day after a hangover by an illiterate blind ape. A couple boob shots added nothing, I was depressed I own this. Zero redeeming qualities. Shame on everyone who touched this.
The plot is barely decipherable (girl goes to house where sister disappeared w/ fat cop in tow, they enter a new dimension). I pretty much had to fast forward to prevent from hanging myself. Slow, incoherent drivel seems like it was written the day after a hangover by an illiterate blind ape. A couple boob shots added nothing, I was depressed I own this. Zero redeeming qualities. Shame on everyone who touched this.
Did you know
- ConnectionsFollows The Evilmaker (2000)
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content