Oxen Split Torturing

With a name like Shogun's Sadism you rather know what to expect. Or at any rate you should, and if you don't, it probably isn't a film for you. I could wrap up this review in a sentence or two just giving a few select highlights of the frequent torture, but its more interesting than that for me, for a few reasons. The first comes in the opening credits, they play over a montage of sepia toned historical imagery that meant very little to me (some kind of account of nastiness down the ages perhaps though the context was lost on me) but the last of them is of the bomb. Its a puzzling way to start such a film and rather had me scratching my head. Does it make the film an act of prostration, an admittance of the horrors of feudal Japan? Perhaps a sobering reminder of mans limitless capacity for horrifying violence? Me, I thought it over and eventually came to figuring that its a snub, a way of saying "You thought the A-bomb was pretty hardcore? Try some of this on for size", or whatever the dignified Japanese equivalent of that would be. The other points are in the very nature of the thing and the state of nasty horror today. It's interesting to me that commentators from morality humping imbeciles to language abusing soundbiters to morons of most stripes like to throw around the term of "torture porn" when talking about almost any horror these days where the violence is relatively graphic and the intent reasonably nasty. All this nonsense about genre decline, hell the whole danged decline of the arts in general, even humanity in general comes rather into sharp relief when one considers that the Japanese have been making meaner films than the average effort decried as "torture porn" for many years previous. And lastly, I found the character of the evil shogun who drives the film's first half to be a rather prescient creation. A forerunner of the sort of people who made the Saw franchise a runaway success, he bores easily of torture and demands more, ever more and more creative methods in fashion that can't help but make me think of those who ceaselessly glut the multiplexes for their fix of ever dafter traps. Now as well as having some generic interest, Shogun's Sadism serves up two quite decent stories in a manner well made and acted throughout. Firstly we have nice guy samurai Iori falling for a girl who tends to his wounds in an hour of need. Unfortunately she is a Christian, Christians are persona non grata in feudal Japan and the results are terrible for all concerned. Second up we have conman Sutezo, throwing is weight around in a brothel before being forced to serve as he has no money. Eventually things get so nasty he elects to escape with one of the hookers, but things just keep getting worse. And like before, results are terrible. Director Yuji Makiguchi captures all without flinching, only shifting the camera's gaze in cases where an effect might be spoilt by overexposure, he also handles the actors well. Some hand-held camera work goes into the mix as well for moments of action and there's generally fine cinematography it all makes for a classy package. Far classier perhaps than is deserved for a film whose delights include a multitude of stabbing, burning, hacking, maiming and at one point an thoroughly horrid forced abortion, but classiness makes for a smooth watch. This surely won't be for everyone but if really mean spirited Japanese exploitation filth is your cup of tea, its essential stuff.

After a very long time, I finally tracked down a copy of this notorious flick. I had heard quite a bit about it and it's disturbing nature (I actively seek out the worst of the worst) and was rather apprehensive to say the least. Well, I definitely was not let down by this one! Holy wow, there was some incredibly sadistic torture methods and downright gut wrenching executions. I've been a hardened film viewer for some time and have seen it all, from the worst french extreme horror to the most underground Japanese flicks and this definitely ranks up with the most brutal of brutal.

Of course, this movie isn't absolutely vivid, due to the time it was released, but don't let that fool you. The violence and torture scenes are still very raw and brutal and even made me cringe a few times (and that's pretty hard to do). Everything from boiling a woman alive, roasting someone on a fire, ankle smashing and on and on. I thought I would get a cheesy 70's grindhouse flick, with all the cheese and over the top dialog expected of the usual fare, but this one smacked me right across the face from the first scene. No, this one doesn't have that silly edge to it, as many of the other flicks of this genre have. It's just downright sick and harsh from moment one. It's also a very well made movie with quite good acting and a great script. The super sadistic Shogun is VERY convincing as well as all of the victims which adds even more to the terrors that hold within. This is truly a shocker worthy of my collection and every other super gore hound's collection as well.

So, if you're seeking out another "sickest tortures on celluloid", then by all means this flick needs to be in your possession. Even if you're looking for a good period piece from the shogunate era, this will definitely suffice as well, but be warned, it is quite a ride through hell. It makes you wonder how people get away with such wanton hate and utter depravity throughout history. I give this a 9/10.. and definitely a 10 for the violence.

The film is divided in two parts: 1st half in 1600s of Edo and the 2nd half in 1800s of the Imperial Japan. The first half of the movie ultra violent nature of that hostile Edo rule depicting gore and horrific scenes might make your skin crawl. The second half of the film tones down the violence a bit adding some dark humor and Black Comedy so as to show the society did progressed from it's Barbaric approaches of tortures or sexual violence to more humiliating approaches where the intention was to break them morally. The film certainly not suited for general audience because it would certainly lead you to depression.

Not a whole lot to say about this one. I'm not even sure why I watched it. It's so unlike my usual viewing material that I thought I'd take a risk. It wasn't as repulsive or disturbing as I was worried it might be, and the production values are better than might be expected.

The movie features two "stories", but I didn't get much plot from either of them. They are apparently set two hundred years apart, but I couldn't tell that from the sets and costumes, which seem to stay the same.

The first story features a crazy, sadistic magistrate who eats live newts straight from a tank and whose bulging, crazy eyes make him look like an Asian version of the Western actor Jack Elam. This is probably the more violent story. The magistrate hates Christians, and a young girl is a Christian, so she gets tortured... but so do a bunch of other people. One guy gets his foot smashed with a hammer until it looks like mince meat with the bones left in it.

The second story was even harder to follow than the first. Something about a con-man who teams up with an escaped prostitute to scam people? Though how, I don't know. This at least had a memorable sequence in which a naked woman is tied up, painted with honey, and some adorable little puppies are let loose on her to lick it off. There's also a scene where people end up wallowing in diarrhoea for some reason.

I guess "Shogun's Sadism" is recommendable if you want to see scenes of torture. It's not interesting for any other purpose however.

Well technically it's torture chambers, as there are two tales of twisted terror in this brutal anthology.

The first concerns disgraced samurai and his forbidden love punished by a sadistic daimyo who enjoys watching his captives suffer the most miserable forms of torture imaginable (e.g. Boiled, burned, beaten, eviscerated and of course the titular dissection technique). The second story features a more comic tone in its telling of a fool who becomes enamoured by a playful but somewhat ambivalent yujo, leading to his eventual downfall.

Whilst there's an abundance of savagery on display across both tales, there's one particularly sordid scene in the second story which in my humble opinion takes the title outright. Probably the most shocking and outrageous thing I've seen on screen; the nauseous reaction of the bystanders in that scene seems sickeningly appropriate and viewers vulnerable to sympathetic spewing are forewarned.

Dirty it may be, but it's by no means cheap looking incorporating a broad range of camera angles, energetic score and first-rate performances played with remarkable conviction despite uncomfortable looking depictions of sexual violence (fogged for our wellbeing).

Not especially realistic looking gore by modern standards (the concealment & substitution camera tricks are fairly obvious to spot), this would've still been confronting when it was released back in '76/'77, and it remains effective today for fans of extreme cinema.