Infernal Affairs III

Where Scorsese's recent version of Infernal Affairs all the loose ends pretty much got tied up during the film whereas with the original we were left with an open (but much more emotionally impacting) conclusion. The first sequel was a prequel so part III was left to pick up afterwards while also going back over the original film and filling in more detail. In doing this it marks itself out as one that is aimed at the fans rather than being just out for money. The downside of this is of course that if you are not a fan you might find this hard to follow along with (and if you have not seen the first film then just forget it totally). Personally I thought the first film was an enjoyable cop thriller but I didn't think it was brilliant or developed characters that well but the tension was great. With the third film the focus was very much on the characters rather than the tension – with the fate of Ming being the modern thread that holds the film together.

If you are into the characters and the parallels with the original film then it is worth seeing because it does do it pretty well. It does ask you to pay attention but it rewards you if you do and have been. There is action but mostly it is the Ming's ongoing struggle with who he is that the film pays most attention to. I quite liked this but must confess that this film still didn't do a great job of bringing out the characters that well and it is more the events and revelations that kept me interested rather than an emotional buy-in with the characters. Lau is perhaps partly to blame for this because I thought he was buttoned a bit too tight – it was understandable in some regards but the third film should have been the point where he shows more of a breakdown (which he does, but again it is events rather than emotion). Leung is good again but his scenes don't seem as relevant or as interesting within this film – again it is probably to do with the lack of emotional buy-in I felt with his character; his performance is natural and engaging though. Outside of these two the rest of the cast are pretty good. Again I didn't think much of the use of Chen but Wong and Tsang are both solid in their small returns.

Overall then an effective and enjoyable film if you love the series and the characters; an interesting one if you have seen the first two films and a pointless one if you are looking to join in at the last minute. Tying up the loose ends of the series, the film isn't tense enough or emotionally impacting enough to be worth a look unless you are really already into the characters but it is an interesting way to bring things to an end – with restraint and tragedy rather than excess.

Internal Affairs III is the final film in the trilogy, this film is like the prequel (the second installment) directed by Andrew Lau and Alan Mak, the former being the one who directed the original. This third film serves as both a prequel and sequel to the first film, as it continues after the events of the first film and before those events. Andy Lau and Tony Leung reprise their roles from the first film as Senior Inspector Lau Kin-Ming, an ex-Triad spy in the Hong Kong Police Force who tries to cover his criminal past and remain as a cop. Tony Leung as Chan Wing-Yan, an undercover Hong Kong Police Force officer in the Triad. He was killed by Inspector B in the first film, but returns in the prequel aspect of the film. Kelly Chen, Anthony Wong, Eric Tsang and Chapman To also reprise their roles again, joined by new cast members Leon Lai and Chen Daoming. Andy Lau actually won the award for Best Actor in the Golden Horse Awards, well deserved I must say. The film was nominated for a lot of other different awards. Andy Lau's acting is superb. Being one of the new cast members, I think Leon Lai is one of those standout performances in the film as Superintendent Yeung Kam-Wing who's Lau's rival in the police force. Chen Daoming is too quite great as "Shadow" Shen Cheng, two good additions to the trilogy.

Months after the events of the original film, Ming suspects a police superintendent as being a new mole for the triads, while years earlier, Yan embarks on his first mission.

So I bought the whole trilogy on Criterion and I got the director's cut of the movie, more than I knew before buying as I had only heard about the first film. I thought this version of the film was a good viewing, a crime story worth telling, with great themes. Will Lau survive the infernal agonies of fear, paranoia, and lack of trust? Watch and you'll find out. It contains many satisfying answers to questions that have lingered after the first two installments. I've seen the question is it unnecessary? It depends on how much you like the story and characters, I don't think this film was wanted, but it was needed and it's because of the story and how much depth it has. The questions you might have, are answered here. The first film ended perfectly and the second installment was a great prequel that gave more context and just more, this film struggles but ends up being a fine addition. Also a satisfying conclusion to the trilogy, I think the pacing could have been better and some of the writing too. Yet, it's solid, tying up loose ends and brings the character arcs to a satisfying conclusion. Especially Lau's character arc. I think the ending was fitting. The trilogy could have worked as one film, but how the writers and directors expanded the story and characters, into something memorable. This was a terrific trilogy. Internal Affairs III was a good crime drama, perhaps a bit unnecessary, but good.

Having now watched the entire INFERNAL AFFAIRS trilogy, I've concluded that only the original film was necessary. The first sequel took the form of a prequel, an entirely extraneous piece of back story that adding nothing to the original and would have worked better as a stand alone movie. This, the second sequel, is even worse, a muddled attempt at tying together both prequel and sequel, adding in lots of entirely superfluous stuff and additional characters that are all entirely necessary.

Tony Leung returns to the movie series, but his scenes amount to nothing more than padding; his character was so carefully delineated in the first movie, there's entirely nothing to add. Andy Lau has the most interesting role in a sub-plot that follows on directly from the first film's, and this section of the film was the most entertaining. But it's still rather unnecessary, and would have been much better had it been tied up at the end of the first film, as Scorsese did when he remade the series as THE DEPARTED.

Overall, INFERNAL AFFAIRS 3 feels confused and muddled. The constant jumping between past and present happens so much that it's ridiculous, and it becomes overwhelming clear that this was only rushed out to make a quick buck or two after the success of the original film.

If you loved the first two 'Internal Affairs' movie, then you'll probably find it easy to also enjoy this concluding part: if not, you may find it more difficult. Part one was a tense thriller; part two, more epic in tone, a prequel that filled in the back story, concentrating on some of the secondary characters from the first film. But it's not completely clear where there's any plot left to fill a third part. What this film does is overlay the previous stories with an additional layer of romanticism and complexity; but there's a certain lack of focus to the plot, with almost all of our favourite characters already dead by the end of the second film (although, in flashback, there's a rebirth for the great Tony Leung, absent from part two). Indeed, the film works almost entirely by encouraging us to feel differently about scenes we have already witnessed. I still liked this third story about the quiet men of violence, and it did succeed in feeling like something more than just a repeat of the earlier films. But it's not so clear how much it adds to them.

I've watched Infernal Affairs I, II & III, in a year time. I loved the first one very much. It gave me a very unexpected feeling. It's simple but strong in impact. Though one could mention a lot of flaws in the plot, I just couldn't resist its charm. The second one made me disappointed because it lacked the kind of impact the first one gave me. Now after watching the third one, I realise why there needs to be a second one in totally different style than the first one. It's a preparation for the audiences adapting to the change in the third one.

I like this third one. Without the second one, probably I would have been like the other audiences critising the change of style from the first one. It's this kind of change, it's made the film more solid, full of human feeling. The first one indeed was touching only the surface of the hole. This third one is more into the content of it - the heart of the people.

I love particularly the part describing Andy Lau's psychological sufferings and changes. The shadowing effect he had with Tony Leung should deserve a credit for script writing, directing and editting. The interlacing of stories between that happened before and after Tony Leung's death has been editted great. I feel sorry for people who don't read this or who don't like it. It's certainly the best part of the film which should earn a credit rather than negative critics.

I would conclude that the first one is like spicy cuisine which is strong in taste and quick in making one like it immediately if you can stand it. The third one is somehow a French cuisine where you have to be patient, taste it slowly together with the wine before you appreciate the marvellous cooking skills and feel the heart of the Chef.