The Hollow
- Episode aired Sep 26, 2004
- TV-14
- 1h 33m
IMDb RATING
7.7/10
2.8K
YOUR RATING
Poirot stumbles on the murder scene of philandering Dr Christow in a country house as his wife stands next to him with a revolver in her hand.Poirot stumbles on the murder scene of philandering Dr Christow in a country house as his wife stands next to him with a revolver in her hand.Poirot stumbles on the murder scene of philandering Dr Christow in a country house as his wife stands next to him with a revolver in her hand.
Jamie de Courcey
- Edward Angkatell
- (as Jamie De Courcey)
Teresa Churcher
- Elsie Patterson
- (as Theresa Churcher)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Excellent work all around especially by the actress who played the wife Gerda (Claire Price) as well, of course, as David Suchet. I did really figure out whodunit but that is beside the point. The ending, which I won't divulge (someone describes it on the Board in answer to someone else's question if you are interested.) I found really sad. Despite Agatha Christie's reputation for writing cardboard characters, I thought these really well-rounded by and large.
The pacing of the story was good and I enjoyed seeing Sarah Miles as Lucy and Edward Hardwicke (Cedric's son I believe in addition to being a well-known Dr. Watson.)) as her husband.
The pacing of the story was good and I enjoyed seeing Sarah Miles as Lucy and Edward Hardwicke (Cedric's son I believe in addition to being a well-known Dr. Watson.)) as her husband.
While vacationing in the country, Hercule Poirot is invited to lunch at a large manor house just down the road. Upon arrival, he's greeted by an unusual sight. Four people, one holding a gun, standing over a man who has just been shot. The gun the woman is holding proves not to have been the murder weapon. Poirot knows something is wrong with the scene he's just witnessed, but what? Can Poirot solve the mystery and find the real killer?
I haven't seen all of episodes in the Poirot series (yet), but I doubt I'll see one that I enjoy much more than this. The Hollow might be the best of the bunch. So what makes this one so good? As best as I can remember, there are only a few instances where the movie strays from Agatha Christie's book - and that's a good thing. As with all these Poirot episodes, the costuming, sets, lighting, and almost every other technical detail you can name are spot on perfect. The acing in The Hollow is as good as you'll find. David Suchet, Jonathan Cake, Claire Price, Edward Hardwicke, Sarah Miles, and Lysette Anthony all give performances worth noting. But Megan Dodds is the real standout. She's perfect as Henrietta Savernake. She's smart, clever, resourceful, beautiful, and every bit Poirot's equal. I've probably given Dodds too much credit and should save some for the screenwriters. The character of Henrietta is one of the best written in the series. Finally, there's the music. I don't remember being so moved by the music in any other Poirot episode. It fits the mood perfectly.
After my most recent viewing, I was going to rate The Hollow a 9/10, but I'm not sure that does it justice. I've seen The Hollow four or five times and even though I know the answer to mystery, it's still as good (or better) as the first time I saw it. Why not - I'll give it a 10/10. It's that good.
I haven't seen all of episodes in the Poirot series (yet), but I doubt I'll see one that I enjoy much more than this. The Hollow might be the best of the bunch. So what makes this one so good? As best as I can remember, there are only a few instances where the movie strays from Agatha Christie's book - and that's a good thing. As with all these Poirot episodes, the costuming, sets, lighting, and almost every other technical detail you can name are spot on perfect. The acing in The Hollow is as good as you'll find. David Suchet, Jonathan Cake, Claire Price, Edward Hardwicke, Sarah Miles, and Lysette Anthony all give performances worth noting. But Megan Dodds is the real standout. She's perfect as Henrietta Savernake. She's smart, clever, resourceful, beautiful, and every bit Poirot's equal. I've probably given Dodds too much credit and should save some for the screenwriters. The character of Henrietta is one of the best written in the series. Finally, there's the music. I don't remember being so moved by the music in any other Poirot episode. It fits the mood perfectly.
After my most recent viewing, I was going to rate The Hollow a 9/10, but I'm not sure that does it justice. I've seen The Hollow four or five times and even though I know the answer to mystery, it's still as good (or better) as the first time I saw it. Why not - I'll give it a 10/10. It's that good.
Just after having moved into his new cottage in the English country, Hercule Poirot gets an invitation to dinner from Sir Henry and Lady Angkatell, the owners of a large mansion nearby. But the next day, one of the guests is found shot near the pool, and his clumsy wife is holding a revolver a few steps away....
This Agatha Christie mystery is somewhat thin, though the killer's plan is still very clever. It's the exquisite filming and cinematography that elevate the story to a higher level. This episode mostly keeps the serious tone of "Five Little Pigs" and "Sad Cypress", but contains more dark humor than them. The cast includes possibly the two most famous actors to have worked in the series by this point, Edward Fox (as the butler) and Sarah Miles (as Lady Angkatell), though the standout performance is given by the dazzlingly beautiful Megan Dodds as the ahead-of-her-time Henrietta: her one-on-one confrontations with Suchet sparkle and are the highlights of the film. Oh, and since an English police inspector does get involved in the case, I think they could have brought Philip Jackson back for this one. (***)
This Agatha Christie mystery is somewhat thin, though the killer's plan is still very clever. It's the exquisite filming and cinematography that elevate the story to a higher level. This episode mostly keeps the serious tone of "Five Little Pigs" and "Sad Cypress", but contains more dark humor than them. The cast includes possibly the two most famous actors to have worked in the series by this point, Edward Fox (as the butler) and Sarah Miles (as Lady Angkatell), though the standout performance is given by the dazzlingly beautiful Megan Dodds as the ahead-of-her-time Henrietta: her one-on-one confrontations with Suchet sparkle and are the highlights of the film. Oh, and since an English police inspector does get involved in the case, I think they could have brought Philip Jackson back for this one. (***)
Just after complaining that I found Death on the Nile to be a little telegraphed and obvious, the 9th season comes to a close with an episode which is nothing of the sort and features a nice mystery where the floor is open and nothing is given away too easily. Within the base elements of this case is the feeling that everything is a little too neat, and a little too balanced to really convince as a real situation. Within the film, this is very well presented by virtue of the actual murder scene almost being a frozen tableau when we (and Poirot) come across it – indeed there is a certain comedic edge to it as Poirot assumes that it is a game, so staged and unnatural does it seem. This very striking image I found most pleasing visually, but that it folds well into the theme of the episode made it work even better.
From here we have an engaging and quite satisfying mystery; with plenty going on, but not so much that the viewer feels they are being deliberately swamped. Technically it is very well delivered, with a consistent sense of pace and style to it – always feeling that slightly browning, crisp way of an English Autumn in the look and feel of the delivery. The pacing of the delivery is important and I enjoyed here how well it seemed to let things bed in, not giving them too long nor rushing them off the screen in favor of the next thing. The cast help this feeling and there is a real sense of quality with Dodds, Miles, Fox and others all in good turns.
In the end it is satisfyingly concluded and delivered in the normal way, making for an enjoyable and very well presented Poirot.
From here we have an engaging and quite satisfying mystery; with plenty going on, but not so much that the viewer feels they are being deliberately swamped. Technically it is very well delivered, with a consistent sense of pace and style to it – always feeling that slightly browning, crisp way of an English Autumn in the look and feel of the delivery. The pacing of the delivery is important and I enjoyed here how well it seemed to let things bed in, not giving them too long nor rushing them off the screen in favor of the next thing. The cast help this feeling and there is a real sense of quality with Dodds, Miles, Fox and others all in good turns.
In the end it is satisfyingly concluded and delivered in the normal way, making for an enjoyable and very well presented Poirot.
I really love the book and the TV adaptation is truthful and is nearly perfect in how I imagined the characters and the settings. The casting was perfect overall, only Sarah Miles as Lady Angkatell was terribly miscast. I loved Lucy Angkatell in the book, she is a very original character, airy, charming, elegant, etc. Sarah Miles´ lady Angkatell was like (and looked like) a mad housekeeper. No charm, no lightness, no elegance, heavy-handed. When the story started and she wandered into Midge´s room in the morning, I was horrified and said: THIS cant be Lucy Angkatell, no way. Unfortunately, she was. She really looked like a house-keeper or a mad relative you keep in your home out of pity. No elegance, no charm, no wit. Awful casting.
I liked the others (the actors who portrayed the characters), Edward was perfect, just how I imagined him. Henrietta was ok, and Veronica Cry was proper hollywood-type beautiful. Midge was good, Gerda was perfection. Gudgeon was really good, but too young, I imagined him older a bit.
I liked the settings, but more the outdoor country than the inside.
I enjoyed this adaptation as the book is one of my favorites. David Suchet as Poirot is the best, altough he was not pivotal to the story. As someone mentioned, this is more of a drama than a detective story.
I liked the others (the actors who portrayed the characters), Edward was perfect, just how I imagined him. Henrietta was ok, and Veronica Cry was proper hollywood-type beautiful. Midge was good, Gerda was perfection. Gudgeon was really good, but too young, I imagined him older a bit.
I liked the settings, but more the outdoor country than the inside.
I enjoyed this adaptation as the book is one of my favorites. David Suchet as Poirot is the best, altough he was not pivotal to the story. As someone mentioned, this is more of a drama than a detective story.
Did you know
- TriviaWhen Henrietta doodles, she always sketches a stylized tree that she calls Yggdrasil. In Norse mythology, Yggdrasil is a giant ash tree that represents Viking cosmology, with the branches standing for different parallel worlds. "Heaven" is at the top and Hel is at the bottom. The world we experience is on one of the middle branches.
- GoofsOutside the Coroners' Court at the Inquest, the sign is displayed without an apostrophe. This is a modern day 'simplification' and is unlikely to have been portrayed that way in the generic time period 1920s to 50s the film is set in.
- Quotes
Henrietta Savernake: What happens if you meet a criminal who is cleverer than you are yourself?
Hercule Poirot: This is not the highest probability, mademoiselle.
- ConnectionsVersion of Kiken na onnatachi (1985)
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 33m(93 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content