Big City Dick: Richard Peterson's First Movie

Richard is one of those characters that you will find in every city in the world. He appears to be a crazy vagrant who makes his living playing music on the street. As the movie progresses you get to know Richard and you see that there is much more to him than you thought. I laughed and cried - every emotion is touched.

This movie showcases an apparently disabled individual in such a way that I have never seen before. With respect and honesty.

Big City Dick is a wild ride that never stops. Each moment more engrossing that the previous. I highly recommend this title for anyone who loves quirky, unique individuals. Very fresh!

This movie was complex, in that the subject is autistic, and in many ways wants his story told. The subjects that were touched upon and not delved into too deeply (father, abuse) were obviously not cut deeply due to the fragile nature of autism. There was enough story there to know what happened to Richard as a boy, details not needed, and would have been harmful to Richard to probe and announce that which is obviously still painful for him. I thought the film-makers did a good job of covering Richard's life, history, his obsessions with certain famous people/music, and the struggles of his daily life (diabetes, self-care, finances). The movie was touching, beautiful, and showed the complexities of this special man. Clearly, I disagree with the person who thought this was too long, and not enough depth into the story.

For Seattleites, this picture is very LOCAL - - for all other places around the world, it touches the hearts of many.

It is the story about a man who has struggled to make a living as a street musician, putting everything he has earned into producing audio recordings, battling injuries thru the rugged wear and tear of standing alone on his own two feet in making many OTHERS see inside themselves, thus being discovered (and rewarded) by the music industry.

Two others that are not listed in the cast credits here include GARY CROW, a Dee-Jay legend in Seattle (http://www.kzok.com/airstaff/crow.shtml), and ROSS SHAFER, initial host of Northwest TV's "ALMOST LIVE" in the 80's, later to be known national in hosting "The New Match Game", and further becoming FOX Network's FIRST talk host with "The Late Show", having one significant program he personslly arranged featuring the ENTIRE living cast of 'Gilligan's Island' (all 7 including Tina) being together on TV for the last time in 1988.

Richard is doing fine and is now in the studio recording his 5th CD release, "Richard Peterson's UnGreatest Hits"

I saw this at the Seattle International Film Festival (with 3 of the filmmakers, the star and several "personalities" in attendence) because I've seen Mr. Peterson walking the streets of Seattle on a few occasions and was curious about him. To see him in person is to know that there's a story to the man. The reviews and anticipation were pretty high in the city for this locally made film and the theater was a full house.

Then the film. Although I can't agree with many of the sentiments about Peterson expressed by the previous reviewer, I do agree that the filmmakers provided a documentary that was either far too long for their subject, or far too superficial to justify 130 mins.

I would have expected the film to begin by directing our attention to his odd character (autism, obsession with "Sea Hunt" and golden-age tv shows, musicianship, hugging 'personalities', etc.) and then slowly reveal the real man, his past, his inner thoughts, etc.). We did get some of that; however, it's efforts were ingenuine, almost as if what was received was secondary to his goofy present.

I sensed that I was not alone; that many of those in the theater grew kind of bored with Peterson, that he wasn't that interesting, wasn't that funny, wasn't that talented that we would want to spend over 2 hours watching this film. But I'm not sure that he wasn't.

I feel like the filmmakers could've made a better and more revealing portrait of the man. Things were hinted at (abusive upbringing, inability to relate to his father, etc.) but never explored at length. Instead, our time was spent on his hugging and horn-blowing.

After the film, when the stage was filled with the makers of the film, it's interesting that questions were few to nil. I think that tells you of the level of emotional involvement we the audience had in the movie. Anyway, I give the movie a 3/10.

Hi.

I don't normally post on here, but after viewing the current lone, negative posting about this movie, I decided to share my thoughts.

I also viewed this film at the Boston Independent Film Festival, and I have to say, after seeing tons of both mainstream and independent films in my lifetime, this is one of the best. A truly stunning achievement and fascinating subject. I'm not sure what the previous reviewer of this film was thinking honestly, and disagree on basically every point that he/she brings up.

If you can see this film somehow, I STRONGLY encourage you to. It is unlike any film or documentary you've seen before, especially ones about sauvants or people with autism (ie the Rain Mans out there). It is a truly all encompassing study and look into a person -- a true film biography that film biographers can only dream of accomplishing.

Mixing film styles, animations, clips, photographs and music, Big City Dick is surprising from the beginning, and never lets up, following a savant with a speech impediment named Richard Peterson on his adventures in Seattle, from playing the trumpet on the streets, making his own albums, forging (and sometimes forcing) friendships with local radio and TV personalities, meeting actor Jeff Bridges, obssessing over Johnny Mathis, making his own albums, etc....it's a tough-love movie with no over sentimentality, giving you the full scope of Richard and the people (some good, some really, really bad) around him...

At the screening I attended, the audience unanimously loved the movie and I imagine it received quite high ratings. One audience member, a street musician himself, paused on his way out, stood in front of the crowd, and said how much he appreciated this look into a much-under-appreciated profession.

Just a truly great film -- I could talk for hours about it. Yes, as the previous reviewer says, it goes on for a bit too long and could have been edited smoother (but really, when you consider how much footage and story there is, it's AMAZING it was edited AT ALL.)

Thanks guys, for making this film!