IMDb RATING
4.9/10
2.9K
YOUR RATING
Unless Darren can survive New York's largest drug mogul, write a paper on Dante's "Inferno," escape three thugs chasing the wrong guy, and sell 50 ecstasy pills to make his tuition payment, ... Read allUnless Darren can survive New York's largest drug mogul, write a paper on Dante's "Inferno," escape three thugs chasing the wrong guy, and sell 50 ecstasy pills to make his tuition payment, he'll never date the girl of his dreams.Unless Darren can survive New York's largest drug mogul, write a paper on Dante's "Inferno," escape three thugs chasing the wrong guy, and sell 50 ecstasy pills to make his tuition payment, he'll never date the girl of his dreams.
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
Corinne Carrey
- Marla
- (as Corrine Carey)
Chris Johnson
- Paul
- (as Chris J. Johnson)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
10cd-83
I've seen Fifty Pills twice, and it is the type of comedy you need to see more than once because you will be laughing too hard the first time to catch all the humor. The script is very tight with no noticeable loopholes.
Acting and direction were both excellent. Film is rated "R" due to language and content, yet curiously has no nudity. I thought it was a refreshing change to see a rated "R" comedy without nudity. If you want to watch porn, go watch porn. If you want to laugh your ass off, watch Fifty Pills! For those who might be concerned about the content, the underlying moral story is actually very interesting...be sure to pay special attention at the end.
Acting and direction were both excellent. Film is rated "R" due to language and content, yet curiously has no nudity. I thought it was a refreshing change to see a rated "R" comedy without nudity. If you want to watch porn, go watch porn. If you want to laugh your ass off, watch Fifty Pills! For those who might be concerned about the content, the underlying moral story is actually very interesting...be sure to pay special attention at the end.
It's too bad that someone took such a good name for a movie...I mean the title alone gives anyone an idea or three about what this movie could have been...(almost famous, requiem for a dream...just to name two extremes...and extremely good, creative movies with similar resources)...It's like when a band takes a great name and shoulda' just named themselves 'another lame-ass band'... Well, the same thing holds true here...a great writer could have taken the same concept (forget the name) and driven this movie into a completely original direction with some real drama, real comedy and real emo-tion...instead, we get what we get...plus now this great title is attached to this run of the mill, halfass storyline with so-so performances...
I don't know...Whenever I take on a project (regardless of what it is) I find myself 'forced' to 'climb the mountain, burn the candle at both ends', etc, etc...to get the best result I can...even if 'those' results weren't required, expected or asked for, I just find myself pushing it as far as I can with the resources I have. So I really don't get it (or maybe just let down) when I see something that has been given great resources and it's not even nearly the best it could be..Specifically, when I see a movie that has had a decent budget thrown at it and it turns out mediocre (at best)..well, it's just too bad...someone fell down somewhere...I think in this case it was a combination of people not giving it their all...starting with the screen writing and then dribbling down to the casting...then onto the direction and the actors themselves...it's just not as good as you would hope for (especially with the great movie name, again)... and that's all I gotta' say about that....F...F.G.
I don't know...Whenever I take on a project (regardless of what it is) I find myself 'forced' to 'climb the mountain, burn the candle at both ends', etc, etc...to get the best result I can...even if 'those' results weren't required, expected or asked for, I just find myself pushing it as far as I can with the resources I have. So I really don't get it (or maybe just let down) when I see something that has been given great resources and it's not even nearly the best it could be..Specifically, when I see a movie that has had a decent budget thrown at it and it turns out mediocre (at best)..well, it's just too bad...someone fell down somewhere...I think in this case it was a combination of people not giving it their all...starting with the screen writing and then dribbling down to the casting...then onto the direction and the actors themselves...it's just not as good as you would hope for (especially with the great movie name, again)... and that's all I gotta' say about that....F...F.G.
This is utter crap. There is no two ways about it. The comedy is not funny the acting is horrible and the girls don't get naked enough to make up for the horrible everything else.
PLOT: a geeky thin college kid on scholarship needs to sell 50 pills in one day or he's totally in big trouble. A variety of totally unbelievable and unfunny scenes follow this is an incredibly boring and tired movie that uses a lot of recycled see it coming a mile away jokes.
LAME.
The dominatrix was a nice touch but not anywhere near enough to save this complete train wreck.
Don't bother.
As I said- see a movie that IS funny and WORTH WATCHING with basically the same plot- see "GO" from 1999
PLOT: a geeky thin college kid on scholarship needs to sell 50 pills in one day or he's totally in big trouble. A variety of totally unbelievable and unfunny scenes follow this is an incredibly boring and tired movie that uses a lot of recycled see it coming a mile away jokes.
LAME.
The dominatrix was a nice touch but not anywhere near enough to save this complete train wreck.
Don't bother.
As I said- see a movie that IS funny and WORTH WATCHING with basically the same plot- see "GO" from 1999
I really liked this movie and thought that the acting was good for each individual.
Interesting that this movie has received some bad reviews. I think it's being treated too harshly as it's overall a nice tale, with decent acting, cinematography, and a well interwoven soundtrack.
In general, the plot was amusing enough and any ills it may have contained were overcome by a great soundtrack. While, Lou Taylor Pucci can be almost a little too cute sometimes and his character's naivety is a little overplayed, the overall the story moves along, is captivating enough, and the characters both entertaining and compelling enough that you want to see the movie resolve in its predictable but happy ending. It's a nice movie and left me with happy feelings.
In general, the plot was amusing enough and any ills it may have contained were overcome by a great soundtrack. While, Lou Taylor Pucci can be almost a little too cute sometimes and his character's naivety is a little overplayed, the overall the story moves along, is captivating enough, and the characters both entertaining and compelling enough that you want to see the movie resolve in its predictable but happy ending. It's a nice movie and left me with happy feelings.
Did you know
- TriviaRalphie's apartment was actually a loft in Downtown Los Angeles.
- GoofsWhen Coleman is in the office, after he is told he is on probation, his audio is out of sync.
- ConnectionsFeatures Diff'rent Strokes (1978)
- SoundtracksSing Song Sung
by La Rocca
- How long is Fifty Pills?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- 50 Pills
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $450,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 25m(85 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content