When Rumpole is charged by Judge Oliphant with contempt of court and faces disbarment, Hilda persuades Sam Ballard to defend him.When Rumpole is charged by Judge Oliphant with contempt of court and faces disbarment, Hilda persuades Sam Ballard to defend him.When Rumpole is charged by Judge Oliphant with contempt of court and faces disbarment, Hilda persuades Sam Ballard to defend him.
Photos
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Who else could possibly portray the eponymous defence brief, but the equally brilliant Leo McKern?
I certainly wouldn't bother with any of the alternative incarnations on radio or TV, all rather pale imitations in comparison.
Has Rumpole finally given up the ghost, is it all getting far too much for him?
Along with the usual suspects in court, Rumpole has to contend with his dentist out of it.
Has he finally given up the ghost, is it all getting far too much for him?
After a lifetime of tilting at judicial windmills has it come to this, is it really the proverbial Hobson's Choice?
Between a home life with his dear spouse, she who must be Hilda?
Or a continued legal existence as, the official Brief to the Timpson Clan of south London petty criminals.
Decisions decisions Hilda, Dodo Macintosh, perpetual shopping, and the continual daily routine.
Or continue working alongside colleagues Sam Bollard, Claude Erskine Brown, and Liz Probert.
But which also entails contending with yet more Judges of the stamp, of the Mad Bull, Olly Oliphant and Injustice Graves?
And the gang's all here: Phillida Trant, now a judge. Judge Graves (who is rather suave), and one of the Timsons. That's at the usual party at the end.
But what happens to Mr Tong, beautifully played by Peter Sallis? All we hear is that he has run off with Mrs Grabowitz from next door.
John Mortimer has a cameo role at the judges' lunch, giving himself the line: "More madeira, Bishop?" Is this a reference to Joan Hickson's last line as Miss Marple, the stock remark: "More tea, vicar?"?
Rumpole upsets Judge Oliphant at a murder trial and then Claude Erskine-Brown alleges that Rumpole spoke to the accused during the recess.
Rumpole's conduct is now scrutinised by the Bar Council. Worse Ballard is defending Rumpole.
It was not the best episode, it was obvious that Claude got the wrong end of the stick. There is a fine cameo from Peter Sallis as the accused.
This was the final episode of Rumpole of the Bailey. Thames Television lost its ITV franchise.
There is a celebratory ending as past and present cast members get together for one last time.
Apparently Rumpole might be rebooted soon. This time as a female barrister. The big problem is that legal procedures have changed a lot in the last 30 years.
It's all cards on the table and written witness statements exchanged in advance these days. A wily fox like Rumpole might find that his teeth have been blunted.
Did you know
- TriviaJohn Mortimer, the creator of the Rumpole series, has a cameo role. He is sitting next to the Bishop at the Tribunal luncheon and passes the port.
- Quotes
Samuel Ballard Q.C.: Ah, Judge. This is a great day for Equity Court. We're celebrating. Mrs. Claude Erskine-Brown elevated to the bench...
Mr. Justice Graves: Yes...
Samuel Ballard Q.C.: ...and her husband in silk.
Mr. Justice Graves: [Taken by surprise] Claude Erskine-Brown?
[With total disdain]
Mr. Justice Graves: They must be giving away silk gowns with pounds of tea nowadays!