A Tibetan woman who was tortured in her home country is found murdered, with her foot missing, and after an exhaustive search of potential suspects, the killer is a victim of torture himself... Read allA Tibetan woman who was tortured in her home country is found murdered, with her foot missing, and after an exhaustive search of potential suspects, the killer is a victim of torture himself.A Tibetan woman who was tortured in her home country is found murdered, with her foot missing, and after an exhaustive search of potential suspects, the killer is a victim of torture himself.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
BD Wong
- Special Agent Dr. George Huang, M.D.
- (as B.D. Wong)
Steve Schirripa
- Paulie Obregano
- (as Steven R. Schirripa)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Although this SVU episode starts out with a murder of a Tibetan refugee and Chris Meloni and Mariska Hargitay assume it has something to do with her political activism it meanders quite a bit until we get to it having to do with her footwear.
Another lovely red herring is thrown in when the SVU squad suspects Frederick Weller initially of the crime. The victim was married to her, but that turns out to be a marriage for citizenship as Weller is gay and has a partner. That sounds like the subject of a whole SVU episode in and of itself.
No after a painstaking investigation the culprit is Charlie Hofheimer who has a raging shoe fetish. But Dr. Huang assures us that those folks are not violent. Which leads us to the final twist of the story which I will not reveal.
Not one of SVU's better episodes it meanders way too much in the plot.
Another lovely red herring is thrown in when the SVU squad suspects Frederick Weller initially of the crime. The victim was married to her, but that turns out to be a marriage for citizenship as Weller is gay and has a partner. That sounds like the subject of a whole SVU episode in and of itself.
No after a painstaking investigation the culprit is Charlie Hofheimer who has a raging shoe fetish. But Dr. Huang assures us that those folks are not violent. Which leads us to the final twist of the story which I will not reveal.
Not one of SVU's better episodes it meanders way too much in the plot.
This is a ripped-from-the-headlines that didn't really work for me. The investigation was pretty boring. I was very distracted by the fake English accent of the actress playing the nanny. Her performance wasn't great. I think the actress runs a gallery in NYC these days.
It's always fun to see Patti Lupone but her defense attorney character was annoying. Par for the course for Law & Order but a bit more obnoxious than usual. Interestingly, the actor playing the older half-brother gave a great performance a few years later in an episode of Law and Order:Special Victims Unit.
That one was about the fetish murder of a Tibetan woman tortured in her home country that takes a turn toward horrendous child abuse.
It's always fun to see Patti Lupone but her defense attorney character was annoying. Par for the course for Law & Order but a bit more obnoxious than usual. Interestingly, the actor playing the older half-brother gave a great performance a few years later in an episode of Law and Order:Special Victims Unit.
That one was about the fetish murder of a Tibetan woman tortured in her home country that takes a turn toward horrendous child abuse.
"Tortured" did not have the most appetising of subject matters, 'Law and Order: Special Victims Unit' often on paper has premises and subjects that really pulls one right in and makes them want to watch the episode in question. There were times though when it, and actually 'Criminal Intent' and even the original 'Law and Order' also, had episodes that didn't sound very interesting. Regrettably, "Tortured" was one of those in the latter category.
Even more regrettably, the execution of the story also could have been quite a bit better. Actually though Season 4 had many fine episodes, but there were a few disappointments such as "Pandora" and especially "Disappearing Acts" and "Tortured" is another one of those. The latter parts are a lot better than the first half when the episode does gradually pick up by quite a lot, but not before for me feeling uncertain as to whether to continue watching. That was my feeling on first watch and on re-watch a few weeks ago my slightly over mixed feelings stance hasn't changed all that much. Not a bad episode, just nothing special.
Shall start with the good things. The production values are fine, have always liked the photography's intimacy and grit and the look of the show has come on a good deal over-time (and it was good to begin with). The music doesn't intrude and has a haunting quality, have not always remembered that the theme tune is easy to remember and holds up. Enough of the dialogue provokes thought.
As said, "Tortured" is an episode that picks up significantly later on. The pace becomes tighter, the storytelling is more eventful and twisty and the twist is a surprising one that cannot be foreseen from the start. The acting is uniformly great from the regulars and the supporting cast, while with no standouts, all suit their roles just fine.
However, "Tortured" is not one of those episodes that starts off particularly promisingly. The first 15-20 minutes or so feels like over-stretched over-obviousness, meaning that the plotting felt somewhat thin and routine. The pace is erratic, with it being quite mundane in the first half and severely lacking in tension while getting better later on.
While it was great that "Tortured" didn't stay over-obvious for the whole episode, some of what follows feels like the episode suddenly tried to cram in a lot in a short period of time which made some of the episode feel muddled and almost strange. Some of the first half's writing could have been tightened a little, the usual tautness is not quite there. Not enough is done to make what sounded uninteresting on paper more interesting in execution, as coherence and momentum are not always there.
Not a bad episode, as has already been indicated, but there is nothing special about it. 6/10
Even more regrettably, the execution of the story also could have been quite a bit better. Actually though Season 4 had many fine episodes, but there were a few disappointments such as "Pandora" and especially "Disappearing Acts" and "Tortured" is another one of those. The latter parts are a lot better than the first half when the episode does gradually pick up by quite a lot, but not before for me feeling uncertain as to whether to continue watching. That was my feeling on first watch and on re-watch a few weeks ago my slightly over mixed feelings stance hasn't changed all that much. Not a bad episode, just nothing special.
Shall start with the good things. The production values are fine, have always liked the photography's intimacy and grit and the look of the show has come on a good deal over-time (and it was good to begin with). The music doesn't intrude and has a haunting quality, have not always remembered that the theme tune is easy to remember and holds up. Enough of the dialogue provokes thought.
As said, "Tortured" is an episode that picks up significantly later on. The pace becomes tighter, the storytelling is more eventful and twisty and the twist is a surprising one that cannot be foreseen from the start. The acting is uniformly great from the regulars and the supporting cast, while with no standouts, all suit their roles just fine.
However, "Tortured" is not one of those episodes that starts off particularly promisingly. The first 15-20 minutes or so feels like over-stretched over-obviousness, meaning that the plotting felt somewhat thin and routine. The pace is erratic, with it being quite mundane in the first half and severely lacking in tension while getting better later on.
While it was great that "Tortured" didn't stay over-obvious for the whole episode, some of what follows feels like the episode suddenly tried to cram in a lot in a short period of time which made some of the episode feel muddled and almost strange. Some of the first half's writing could have been tightened a little, the usual tautness is not quite there. Not enough is done to make what sounded uninteresting on paper more interesting in execution, as coherence and momentum are not always there.
Not a bad episode, as has already been indicated, but there is nothing special about it. 6/10
Did you know
- TriviaThe victim in this episode is loosely based on the first victim of Oregon serial killer Jerry Brudos. Her name was Linda Slawson, who at the time of her death was 19 years old and worked as a door-to-door encyclopedia saleswoman. In January of 1968 she knocked on Brudos's door in an attempt to sell him an encyclopedia; Brudos, whose wife and two children were also home, lured her into the garage. When Slawson entered the garage Brudos hit her over the head with a wooden plank and choked her to death; he then dressed her body in different sets of underwear and shoes he had stolen from other women and arranged her body in provocative poses while taking pictures of her. Afterwards he cut her left foot off before dumping her body in the Willamette River; he kept her foot in his freezer and would use it to model his collection of stolen shoes.
- GoofsThe victim's throat is moving when M.E. Warner shines the light on her to test for copper.
- Quotes
Det. John Munch: [after an INS bureaucrat complains about immigrants coming to America] It's almost as though there's a sign that says "Give us your tired and poor."
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content